• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Homosexuality sinful and/or unnatural?

Is homosexuality wrong and/or unnatural?


  • Total voters
    128
Because it’s deceptive.

I see two seemingly normal families, the picture of health and happiness. This is the very stuff that propaganda and indoctrination is made from. What could be so threatening about these two pictures, with the fresh faces, the sun shining, the seemingly happy kids?

But hold on. That’s what makes these pictures so bad. These pictures are just as dangerous as “Heather Has Two Mommies” and “Daddy’s Roommate”, in that it seeks to normalize something unnatural. It’s like taking a criminal to trail, and dressing him up in a respectable outfit so that the jury will take pity on him. You’re trying to give gays an air of respectability. I think that trying to do that by showing this picture is a really sick thing to do.

You've already told us that homosexuality is natural, so I don't know what you are talking about.
 
Maybe your right. Maybe two guys (or two girls), having unnatural gay sex, gives them lots more respectability. Yeah, I'm sure.

Again, what's with this "unnatural" stuff? You've already proven that homosexuality is natural.
 
Again, what's with this "unnatural" stuff? You've already proven that homosexuality is natural.

I'm not sure what natural/unnatural has to do with social acceptability. I'm pretty sure that bouncing a ball up a down and throwing it into a hoop doesn't exist in "nature."
 
Sex is natural, period. It's not unnatural simply because you are weirded out by it.

Why do you insist on making people about their sexual orientation?

BDB... he already proved that homosexuality and all behaviors associated with it are natural. Here... let me show you:

Natural: existing in, or formed by nature.
 
I'm not sure what natural/unnatural has to do with social acceptability. I'm pretty sure that bouncing a ball up a down and throwing it into a hoop doesn't exist in "nature."

I agree that it's irrelevant, but it being irrelevant is ITSELF irrelevant at the moment. RamFel has proven that homosexuality is natural. Here, see for yourself:

Natural: existing in, or formed by nature.
 
Sex is natural, period. It's not unnatural simply because you are weirded out by it.

Why do you insist on making people about their sexual orientation?

I've gone over this already. Gay sex lacks the potential for procreation. That makes it unnatural. It's unnatural! You can't prove otherwise.
 
I've gone over this already. Gay sex lacks the potential for procreation. That makes it unnatural. It's unnatural! You can't prove otherwise.

Clouds lack the potential to procreate. Are they unnatural too? Can you do us all a favor and actually post your definition of natural?
 
I've gone over this already. Gay sex lacks the potential for procreation. That makes it unnatural. It's unnatural! You can't prove otherwise.

No, it doesn't. That's a huge logical leap. I don't know how many times this point has to be made clear to you.

The thing is, nobody is knowledgeable enough to know for certain why nature and evolution have intended homosexuality to exist.
 
I've gone over this already. Gay sex lacks the potential for procreation. That makes it unnatural. It's unnatural! You can't prove otherwise.

CC just showed me where you said it IS natural, i.e., it occurs in nature.

But no. You haven't gone over "Why do you insist on making people about their sexual orientation?"

Marriage isn't about sex. Anybody who tells me otherwise, I will call a liar. Amy Grant once said you don't know what love is until somebody who didn't give birth to you cleans up your vomit.
 
CC just showed me where you said it IS natural, i.e., it occurs in nature.

But no. You haven't gone over "Why do you insist on making people about their sexual orientation?"

Marriage isn't about sex. Anybody who tells me otherwise, I will call a liar. Amy Grant once said you don't know what love is until somebody who didn't give birth to you cleans up your vomit.

lol boop, I love your new sig line and I have got to know who and what Zyph was responding to!
 
lol boop, I love your new sig line and I have got to know who and what Zyph was responding to!

Do a search on "unicorns" and you should find it. :)
 
What is the name of your religion?

Why does a person's religion have to have a name? (I know you addressed this to CC, but I have been wondering this for a while.)

My personal religious beliefs aren't part of any recognized/organized religion, probably not even a name for what I believe. Should that restrict my religious rights because there is no church or set rules that I should follow?
 
Why does a person's religion have to have a name? (I know you addressed this to CC, but I have been wondering this for a while.)

My personal religious beliefs aren't part of any recognized/organized religion, probably not even a name for what I believe. Should that restrict my religious rights because there is no church or set rules that I should follow?

I believe you are confusing the word religion for faith or spirituality.
 
Mine condones and approves and recommends those things.

Now to find some one else with my religion.

You sure?
jersey-shore-castjpg-f76ced407fe8ff0c_large.jpg

:mrgreen:
 
You sure?
jersey-shore-castjpg-f76ced407fe8ff0c_large.jpg

:mrgreen:

Not sure if they are ones I would recruit to my religion, but you are certainly welcome to join. Any one else want to join my religion?
 
I believe you are confusing the word religion for faith or spirituality.

But why does it matter either way. I believe in things that, if put together, could be a foundation for a religion (I am just too lazy to bother to either put them all down myself or look into other religions enough to find one that matches mine enough).

Also, does everyone need to completely abide by every tenet of a religion that they claim to belong to? Is it not possible for people to say, "well this religion is the one that I feel most comfortable in or that most matches the majority of what I believe. I don't believe these parts of this religion, but the rest all fits and no one else is closer."?
 
Not sure if they are ones I would recruit to my religion, but you are certainly welcome to join. Any one else want to join my religion?

Eh, I kinda thought that the cast of Jersey Shore may already be following a different branch of your religion :mrgreen:

What do you call it? It's tempting...
 
What is the name of your religion?

CC is Jewish.

He can elaborate more about the specifics of his personal belief system.
 
Why does a person's religion have to have a name? (I know you addressed this to CC, but I have been wondering this for a while.)

My personal religious beliefs aren't part of any recognized/organized religion, probably not even a name for what I believe. Should that restrict my religious rights because there is no church or set rules that I should follow?

I think he was asking to get a better idea of his religious stance, not that a name would mean anything else.
 
But why does it matter either way. I believe in things that, if put together, could be a foundation for a religion (I am just too lazy to bother to either put them all down myself or look into other religions enough to find one that matches mine enough).

Also, does everyone need to completely abide by every tenet of a religion that they claim to belong to? Is it not possible for people to say, "well this religion is the one that I feel most comfortable in or that most matches the majority of what I believe. I don't believe these parts of this religion, but the rest all fits and no one else is closer."?

I agree but you are talking about major tenets specifically mentioned. So to say you are Christian, and not believe in the divinity Christ (for example) would mean you are not a Christian. Many situations like this would probably exist with many different religions.
 
But why does it matter either way. I believe in things that, if put together, could be a foundation for a religion (I am just too lazy to bother to either put them all down myself or look into other religions enough to find one that matches mine enough).

Also, does everyone need to completely abide by every tenet of a religion that they claim to belong to? Is it not possible for people to say, "well this religion is the one that I feel most comfortable in or that most matches the majority of what I believe. I don't believe these parts of this religion, but the rest all fits and no one else is closer."?

Who says it matters? I asked what his religion was.
 
I agree but you are talking about major tenets specifically mentioned. So to say you are Christian, and not believe in the divinity Christ (for example) would mean you are not a Christian. Many situations like this would probably exist with many different religions.

Oh, no I agree with that, which is an important reason that I wouldn't call myself Christian despite believing that Jesus was a real person and being raised Christian, because I can't say that I believe that to be true.

But when it comes to smaller things, such as whether to believe that homosexuality is right or wrong or marriage should be exclusively between a man and a woman or believing that a person has to abide by certain or all food restrictions of a particular religion, I think that there is some room for movement to be able to claim at the very least, a major religion, such as Christianity, without subscribing to a specific denomination within that major religion, such as Baptist or Methodist.
 
Back
Top Bottom