• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will You Vote for Obama?

Will You Vote for Obama

  • Total voters
    83
rocket88 said:
Oh no! White people are such victims.

I swear if the ultra-right didn't have their victimhood, they'd have nothing at all. Claims of reverse racism mean - YOU"RE A ****ING IDIOT!
Click to expand...

What are you getting so mad about?

.......its not like 98% of white people voted for McCain's white skin........that would clearly be !!!!RACISM!!!!

Now lets get back to the topic......are you going to vote for Obama?

.......and are you currently under the influence of marijObama or Hopium?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
 
Everyone come on honestly follow the teachings of Badmutha abadon logical thinking, drop everything you are doing and follow this mans teaching and obviosly amazing debate skills. He is a genius wake your minds up!
 
Badmutha said:
What are you getting so mad about?

.......its not like 98% of white people voted for McCain's white skin........that would clearly be !!!!RACISM!!!!

Now lets get back to the topic......are you going to vote for Obama?

.......and are you currently under the influence of marijObama or Hopium?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Click to expand...

I question your 98% number; however, yes it was racist to only vote for obama because he was black. Thankfully, both parties had probably equal share of racist canceling each other out.
 
Redress said:
Read your chart for comprehension. Even by it's standard(which we have no clue what standard that is since you do not supply a source), he crossed the isle over 4 % of the time, which is not "never".
Click to expand...

Well give that man a peace prize.......

Nice try though.

Well, not really, it's a pretty bad job actually.
Click to expand...

Well clearly you have proved Obama to be a "Moderate" and a "Centrist"............who crosses the aisle 4% of the time.
.
.
.
.
 
I grew up on a third generation cotton farm by a redneck democrat family. I realize the Democrat Party is not the same one as I grew up with but neither is the Republican Party.

But after hearing the Republicans constantly call anyone who voted for Obama a brainless moron I don't think I could ever vote for their party. In state and local elections have voted for Republican candidates before but now really find it hard to vote anyone with a "R" next to their name.

Am just amazed at how many call Obama a moron but just think Palin just got caught off guard by Katie Couric.
 
Last edited:
Badmutha said:
Can you name a candidate who wouldnt be better than Obama--Worst President in History?
Click to expand...

The fact that you and people like you seriously believe this tripe is the reason that the GOP is unlikely to produce a candidate I can vote for. Thank you for playing.
 
xpiher said:
I question your 98% number; however, yes it was racist to only vote for obama because he was black.
Thankfully, both parties had probably equal share of racist canceling each other out.
Click to expand...

Well its permitted and promoted in one party.......where 98% of blacks can vote black without a whimper of racism.......and a Grand Klugel of the KKK can serve as Senator.
.
.
.
.
 
Badmutha said:
Well its permitted and promoted in one party.......where 98% of blacks can vote black without a whimper of racism.......and a Grand Klugel of the KKK can serve as Senator.
.
.
.
.
Click to expand...

The senator in question was elected when the Dems were the small gov party and stayed in power, after giving up those views, simply because of the fact that people typically don't vote and will vote for the name they are familiar with over the name they aren't.
 
Last edited:
Crosscheck said:
I grew up on a third generation cotton farm by a redneck democrat family. I realize the Democrat Party is not the same one as I grew up with but neither is the Republican Party.

But after hearing the Republicans constantly call anyone who voted for Obama a brainless moron I don't think I could ever vote for their party. In state and local elections have voted for Republican candidates before but now really find it hard to vote anyone with a "R" next to their name.

Am just amazed at how many call Obama a moron but just think Palin got caught off guard by Katie Couric.
Click to expand...

Obama is not a moron. no matter how you cut it-a moron could not graduate magna cum laude from Harvard law. but Obama was not qualified to be a good president. he was not experienced as an executive and he had no real life experience that could compensate for that deficit. He was elected mainly because he was not scrutinized nearly enough by an adoring press that wanted him instead of hillary and john
 
xpiher said:
The senator in question was elected when the Dems were the small gov party and stayed in power, after giving up those views, simply because of the fact that people typically don't vote and will vote for the name they are familiar with over the name they aren't.
Click to expand...

the dems have been the BIG GOVERNMENT party since the days of Woodrow wilson
 
TurtleDude said:
Obama is not a moron. no matter how you cut it-a moron could not graduate magna cum laude from Harvard law. but Obama was not qualified to be a good president. he was not experienced as an executive and he had no real life experience that could compensate for that deficit. He was elected mainly because he was not scrutinized nearly enough by an adoring press that wanted him instead of hillary and john
Click to expand...

He was elected because he followed The 48 Laws of Power to the letter.

TurtleDude said:
the dems have been the BIG GOVERNMENT party since the days of Woodrow wilson
Click to expand...

Not exactly true. The Dems used to be all about states rights. That change after the NEW DEAL collation broke up.
 
Last edited:
TurtleDude said:
He was elected mainly because he was not scrutinized nearly enough by an adoring press that wanted him instead of hillary and john
Click to expand...

I could've voted for Clinton. I would have voted for McCain if not for Palin. The American party system is a polarizing system that marginalizes the most pragmatic, effective leaders and glorifies the fringe.
 
Crosscheck said:
I grew up on a third generation cotton farm by a redneck democrat family. I realize the Democrat Party is not the same one as I grew up with but neither is the Republican Party.
Click to expand...

Good gawd....The Republican Party is the Democrat Party you grew up with........granted I view that as a problem.......

But after hearing the Republicans constantly call anyone who voted for Obama a brainless moron I don't think I could ever vote for their party. In state and local elections have voted for Republican candidates before but now really find it hard to vote anyone with a "R" next to their name.
Click to expand...

Well at least your basing your vote on something important.......

Am just amazed at how many call Obama a moron but just think Palin got caught off guard by Katie Couric.
Click to expand...

Can we agree they are both morons........and one is The Most Inexperienced President in History to boot.

Im amazed at how many people tried to attack Palin without attacking Obama......which was impossible.
.
.
.
 
Last edited:
Viktyr Korimir said:
I could've voted for Clinton. I would have voted for McCain if not for Palin. The American party system is a polarizing system that marginalizes the most pragmatic, effective leaders and glorifies the fringe.
Click to expand...

FPTP combined with primary voting is a terrible system. Yup yup.
 
xpiher said:
He was elected because he followed The 48 Laws of Power to the letter.



Not exactly true. The Dems used to be all about states rights. That change after the NEW DEAL collation broke up.
Click to expand...

the new deal was the biggest bit of big government in our country's history

it is the foundation and well spring for all big government. the legal precedents created during the ND set the stage for destroying states' rights and ignoring the tenth amendment
 
TurtleDude said:
well I agree with that sentiment 100%

but two unmarried childless women don't have the anchors to the future that I would like among Supreme Court Justices.
Click to expand...

Why are you so concerned about the justices in particular?
 
StillBallin75 said:
Why are you so concerned about the justices in particular?
Click to expand...

Life time appointments who can affect social change on a scale larger than any other branch of government maybe?
 
Badmutha said:
Well give that man a peace prize.......



Well clearly you have proved Obama to be a "Moderate" and a "Centrist"............who crosses the aisle 4% of the time.
Click to expand...

Well clearly I never claimed that. I don't make claims I can't back up.
 
disneydude said:
It always amazes me when liberals say that Obama has disappointed them. We all knew that despite the right-wings attempts to paint him as a liberal, Obama is a total moderate. His senate record should have given everyone a clue. The reality is, while we all had hopes that perhaps he would govern a little more to the left, we should have known that in todays America, it is unlikely we are going to have a true liberal in the whitehouse.
Click to expand...

I'd agree with you if he hadn't campaigned on a platform for change. What fundamental changes has he really effected?
 
Last edited:
xpiher said:
Life time appointments who can affect social change on a scale larger than any other branch of government maybe?
Click to expand...

IMO social activism on the part of the court does little to affect people's personal lives. Personally, if I were a conservative I'd be much more worried about the economic decisions of the executive and legislative.
 
StillBallin75 said:
Why are you so concerned about the justices in particular?
Click to expand...

because they can do stuff that lasts for ages

for example-ignoring130 years of precedent and allowing the unconstitutional new deal to remain in place
 
Badmutha said:
What are you getting so mad about?

.......its not like 98% of white people voted for McCain's white skin........that would clearly be !!!!RACISM!!!!

Now lets get back to the topic......are you going to vote for Obama?

.......and are you currently under the influence of marijObama or Hopium?
Click to expand...

Did you know that blacks voted for Kerry by over 90 %. Did you know they voted for Gore by similar amounts? Clinton over 80 % both elections. So why is it suddenly race when they do the same thing for Obama? Do you honestly think the percentage would have been different if Clinton had won the nomination? That whole 98 % thing has been thoroughly debunked numerous times.

Good job playing the race card though.
 
Andalublue said:
I'd agree with you if he hadn't campaigned on a platform for change. What fundamental changes has he really effected?
Click to expand...

Other than significant health care reform?
 
TurtleDude said:
because they can do stuff that lasts for ages

for example-ignoring130 years of precedent and allowing the unconstitutional new deal to remain in place
Click to expand...

Ah okay I see where you're coming from, even if I don't entirely agree.
 
Redress said:
Did you know that blacks voted for Kerry by over 90 %. Did you know they voted for Gore by similar amounts? Clinton over 80 % both elections. So why is it suddenly race when they do the same thing for Obama? Do you honestly think the percentage would have been different if Clinton had won the nomination? That whole 98 % thing has been thoroughly debunked numerous times.

Good job playing the race card though.
Click to expand...

the difference is not the percentage but the actual turnout
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom