- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Mmk. Since yer the new expert on what is and isn't wnism.
I seem to know a whole lot more about it than you.
Mmk. Since yer the new expert on what is and isn't wnism.
Just like the same morons who voted for the racist kenyan communist obama....we see how well that turned out he got elected...
The implication of the OP is that you either vote for Ron Paul, or you'd rather have the government interfere in every aspect of your life. That's a logical fallacy. It should be self-evident.
Secondly, simply because some candidates may be less libertarian or libertarian-leaning as Ron Paul, doesn't mean they advocate large government interference in citizen's daily lives. According to the OP, if you don't vote for Ron Paul than you favour big government interference in your life. I can vote for another candidate and still be anti-big government. (In fact, many libertarians voted for conservative candidates that supported measures like the Patriot Act, but that doesn't mean they actually support large government intervention programs and measures).
If Ron Paul got the nomination, I would come out of retirement to vote for him.
If Ron Paul got the nomination, I would vote for Capt'n C.