friday
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Messages
- 801
- Reaction score
- 196
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
When Bush invaded Iraq based on massive amounts from intel from every credible agency saying that Saddam had a WMD program, Bush was declared to be an imperialist. When Bush took us to war with only an authorization for the use of force from Congress (same thing he had in Afghanistan), he was labeled a war criminal.
Over the past couple months, Barack Obama has led us into an undeclared war against Libya. Without getting even an authorization for the use of force from Congress, Obama has bombed military and civilian sites in Libya under the veil of NATO. A month after requesting an additional $1.7 billion in funds for Libya so that Ghadaffi could fight Al Qaida terrorists, Obama was firing missiles at Ghadaffi from a distance and funding Libyan rebels with unconfirmed ties to Al Qaida.
Then this past weekend, drowned out by the killing of Osama Bin Laden, NATO's missile strikes assassinated Ghadaffi's 29 year old son and three of his grandchildren at a peaceful family gathering. Despite Obama's claim that their mission is not to kill or remove Ghadaffi, just to save civilian lives by lobbing missiles at the country from a distance, Obama killed innocent civilian family members of Ghadaffi. That event took place later in the same day Ghadaffi called on a ceasefire and offered to negotiate a truce.
Obama is not the President of peace, hope, change, or negotiation. He is turning out to be more violent than his predecessor.
Ghadaffi is a head of a sovereign state that we are not at war with. He was seeking a ceasefire the day we assassinated his civilian grandchildren.
So here is the question, was this assassination a violation of international law and/or the War Crimes Act of 1996? Please provide proof and documentation where possible.
Over the past couple months, Barack Obama has led us into an undeclared war against Libya. Without getting even an authorization for the use of force from Congress, Obama has bombed military and civilian sites in Libya under the veil of NATO. A month after requesting an additional $1.7 billion in funds for Libya so that Ghadaffi could fight Al Qaida terrorists, Obama was firing missiles at Ghadaffi from a distance and funding Libyan rebels with unconfirmed ties to Al Qaida.
Then this past weekend, drowned out by the killing of Osama Bin Laden, NATO's missile strikes assassinated Ghadaffi's 29 year old son and three of his grandchildren at a peaceful family gathering. Despite Obama's claim that their mission is not to kill or remove Ghadaffi, just to save civilian lives by lobbing missiles at the country from a distance, Obama killed innocent civilian family members of Ghadaffi. That event took place later in the same day Ghadaffi called on a ceasefire and offered to negotiate a truce.
Obama is not the President of peace, hope, change, or negotiation. He is turning out to be more violent than his predecessor.
Ghadaffi is a head of a sovereign state that we are not at war with. He was seeking a ceasefire the day we assassinated his civilian grandchildren.
So here is the question, was this assassination a violation of international law and/or the War Crimes Act of 1996? Please provide proof and documentation where possible.