• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Obama a lame duck?

Is Obama a lame duck?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 43.2%
  • No

    Votes: 21 56.8%

  • Total voters
    37
  • Poll closed .
Junior... the election was historic, game changing... decisive.

That depends how you define historic, game changing and decisive. The GOP broke their own no earmarks within days. The GOP just agreed to a plan that will expand the deficit. Winning elections with wide margins when the country thinks you are just as worthless as your opponent is hardly "decisive."

You can throw in whatever you believe they sold across the country... but in short the people were pissed at the spending and ObamaKare.

Actually people were pissed off for a variety of reasons. Furthermore, the lack of youth vote as normal during midterms really hurt the Democrats. The GOP hardly won. The Democrats gave them the election.

You are looking purely at numbers and nothing else. Hence why I asked if the Democrats won decisively in 2006? You failed to answer.

They won in a historic fashion.

Which to you means numbers and nothing else. I see you are ignoring the poll after poll after poll showing contemptuous views of the GOP by the public at the same level as the Democrats. But no one ever described you an honest person.

Don't you ever tire of getting your ass kicked Junior?

I didn't vote for Obama in 2008. Furthermore, you get your ass kicked here all of the time. I rarely lose arguments. You rarely win them.

Doesn't change the fact the election was decisive.

So you believe, despite having no coherent thoughts and a public who thinks they are worthless as the Democrats they won decisively?

You should read up on what Rubio said. He fully acknowledges the GOP did not win this election anywhere near decisively and they are on an exceedingly short leash. They do one bad thing, and it's likely game over.

I have no idea... let me know when you find out. I'll pass it on to your relatives just in case you forget to take your meds.

Ah illusions of grandeur.

Yeah... for 100-years R's have been itching to inch towards ObamaKare

Yes actually. Go look up the history of the proposals within the health care bill. They ain't Democrat. Funniest **** is that we get a Democrat president in office who enacts Republican agenda items and the die hard Republican hacks crucify him for it. :shock:

Forcing people to by insurance, and fining them if they do not? That's the Republican's position??? In your mind perhaps.

And Nixon's. And the Heritage Foundation's. I guess you think they aren't aligned with Republicans eh?

Health insurance mandate began as a Republican idea - The Boston Globe

Zimmer fail. Once again.

You really outta to fact check before mouthing off like that in the future.

You are as thick as a brick.

Says the guy who is arguing Nixon and the Heritage Foundation never held Republican ideas.

See how easy it is to get hits in on you? You never bother to fact check before opening your mouth.

The argument has been about a line T.E.D. posted ages ago about the election not being either decisive or historic... but you pull your age-old tactics of trying to twist the argument and put words into folks mouths that never uttered them.

Good luck proving that. That's your standard line when my foot is down your throat. But you have to write it for obvious reasons. :peace

You just can't seem to expunge that poison from your system. But I will always help you overcome this mental disorder whenever I can..

Hey, better then being a compulsive liar.
 
Your point was the election was not a decisive victory.

Yep, I've said that several times. I've even demonstrated it with simple common sense -- neither party controls Congress, come January, ergo nothing has actually been decided by the election in and of itself, ergo the election was not a decisive victory.

I've also clearly stated that you can only call it "historic" if you you mean "historic comeback from totally getting your ass kicked to having some kind of influence over what happens."

Your consistent response has been to make fun of me and repeat your mantra and provide no other argument to back up your assertion.

YHL HAND
 
There will always be gays in the military-always have been and always will be. People need to deal and get the hell over it.

And there is a policy in place to deal with it. Were already over it. The military is just fine, but can't say the same about the economy.
 
That depends how you define historic, game changing and decisive. The GOP broke their own no earmarks within days. The GOP just agreed to a plan that will expand the deficit. Winning elections with wide margins when the country thinks you are just as worthless as your opponent is hardly "decisive."
Ah... good try. We were talking about the election being decisive, and historic... and it is game changing. You can attempt to twist the election results, but it doesn't chenge the fact. From the governor's houses across the state, in the state houses and on the Hill... an all-American ass whoop'in.

Actually people were pissed off for a variety of reasons. Furthermore, the lack of youth vote as normal during midterms really hurt the Democrats. The GOP hardly won. The Democrats gave them the election.
Yeah... that's why the Dead Kennedy seat went to an R before Dead Kennedy's body was cold. The ignorant... I mean the youth vote is never large. It's always overestimated. It's not a wonder they want the ignorant youth to vote.

Keep trying to spin... it was an a historic ass kicking. Hell, even the left couldn't deny it.

You are looking purely at numbers and nothing else. Hence why I asked if the Democrats won decisively in 2006? You failed to answer.
The Dems Foley Wabbit worked wonders in 2006. The Obama Wabbt worked OK in 2008. They'z wunn'in ouda wabbits.

Which to you means numbers and nothing else. I see you are ignoring the poll after poll after poll showing contemptuous views of the GOP by the public at the same level as the Democrats. But no one ever described you an honest person.
First... they voted for Republicans in massive numbers... not just federally but at the state level. And Krauthammer backed up my game changing charge; that Dems seeking survival will go along with R's on key votes. The Tea Party movement isn't dead... it's just getting rolling.

I didn't vote for Obama in 2008.
Frankly your word cannot be trusted. You're a snake who has difficulty correctly referencing what others have stated, so why in the world should I believe you on this?

Furthermore, you get your ass kicked here all of the time. I rarely lose arguments. You rarely win them.
ROTFLOL... I've listed the arguments you've gotten your ass kicked. You hit about as often as Charlie Brown.

So you believe, despite having no coherent thoughts and a public who thinks they are worthless as the Democrats they won decisively?
Look at the election... if they thought them as worthless as the Dems, the election wouldn't have been historic and decisive.

You should read up on what Rubio said. He fully acknowledges the GOP did not win this election anywhere near decisively and they are on an exceedingly short leash. They do one bad thing, and it's likely game over.
If they behave like Dems it's over. No question.

Ah illusions of grandeur.
Well, no... I'm not the one on meds, or has anger management problems... as you admitted... being angry 95% of the time.

Yes actually. Go look up the history of the proposals within the health care bill. They ain't Democrat. Funniest **** is that we get a Democrat president in office who enacts Republican agenda items and the die hard Republican hacks crucify him for it. :shock:
From The One: "...So I pass a signature piece of legislation, where we finally get health care for all Americans, something that Democrats have been fighting for for a hundred years..."
President Obama to Democrats: It's Not Enough to Have 'a Purist Position' and Feel 'Sanctimonious' -- We Need 'Victories for the American People' - Political Punch

Yep... Republicans have been pushing for unconstitutional healthkare for ages... that's why they signed on to HillaryKare in 1994. Oh snap! They didn't?

Health insurance mandate began as a Republican idea - The Boston Globe

Zimmer fail. Once again.

You really outta to fact check before mouthing off like that in the future.
I see it went far... and it's been their platform for 100-years. People make mistakes... even republicans... but a bit of communism as their platform for a century? No. That's the SAPs.

Says the guy who is arguing Nixon and the Heritage Foundation never held Republican ideas.
Nixon wasn't a conservative... he's responsible for the EPA among other idiocy... No R is perfect, but they certainly haven't been proponents of ObamaKare for a century.

See how easy it is to get hits in on you? You never bother to fact check before opening your mouth.
And you take the one off and hold as a party position for generations.

Good luck proving that. That's your standard line when my foot is down your throat. But you have to write it for obvious reasons. :peace
LOL... the election was decisive... historic, game changing, and anomalies do not a party platform make.

Try again Junior.

You grasped at straws... and once again got your ass kicked.

Hey, better then being a compulsive liar.
You have a nasty habit of accusing others of lying, when you are the meister of inserting words into people's mouths they never stated, and twisting their arguments out of proportion. It's a mental deficiency, it's a sign of dishonesty at an amazing level because it is ever recurring... it is your MO and it is known DP-wide. It's sad, but it's your and your family's problem.

.
 
Last edited:
Yep, I've said that several times.
And you've also stated the election wasn't historic!
Absurd.

I've even demonstrated it with simple common sense -- neither party controls Congress, come January, ergo nothing has actually been decided by the election in and of itself, ergo the election was not a decisive victory.
Reagan won a decisive election and it gave him the leverage to do much with a Congress he didn't control.

What we just had is a decisive election from state houses to Capitol Hill. It has the ability to bend Libs, before they are broken in 2012. Their party is in disarray, and they know they're in the cross hairs.

"I've even demonstrated it with simple common sense"... and well... it's just opinion, and doesn't change the fact there are political pressures that come with getting your ass kicked in a decisive and historic election. I have to laugh, you tried crapping on my "opinion", yet yours is untouchable?

I've also clearly stated that you can only call it "historic" if you you mean "historic comeback from totally getting your ass kicked to having some kind of influence over what happens."
Well, there were no qualifiers in your original statement... but picking up 63 seats is historic... as is the Dems getting their asses booted in record time.

Your consistent response has been to make fun of me and repeat your mantra and provide no other argument to back up your assertion.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.... Well, you shouldn't have tried to flame me with your lame attempt about my linguistic skills. It's a losing proposition. You recall... or is your memory feeble too?

.
 
Last edited:
And you've also stated the election wasn't historic!

There you go again, quoting selectively and out of context. That wasn't all I said. Absurd, indeed.

Reagan won a decisive election and it gave him the leverage to do much with a Congress he didn't control.

We're not talking about Reagan.

What we just had is a decisive election from state houses to Capitol Hill. It has the ability to bend Libs, before they are broken in 2012. Their party is in disarray, and they know they're in the cross hairs.

Actually, no. What we just had is an election that split Congress down the middle. Democrats are running for cover after pissing off a bunch of the voters, and thanks to the Tea Party movement the Republican party is in the process of cannibalizing itself. The Democratic leadership is fairly unpopular, and the Republicans have no leadership to speak of.

Sounds like a Mexican standoff to me.

... and well... it's just opinion, and doesn't change the fact there are political pressures that come with getting your ass kicked in a decisive and historic election. I have to laugh, you tried crapping on my "opinion", yet yours is untouchable?

My position is based on fact, not opinion. The election results clearly divided Congress, and both parties clearly have leadership problems, and the Republicans clearly don't know what the hell to do with the Tea Party movement.
 
Ah... good try. We were talking about the election being decisive, and historic... and it is game changing.

Which to you means nothing but numbers. You don't even define your own criteria.

You can attempt to twist the election results, but it doesn't chenge the fact.

What fact? You didn't define your terms. And you think anyone who disagrees with your undefined, unstated criteria is twisting words. Really, honesty is not something that would ever describe you in any measure.

From the governor's houses across the state, in the state houses and on the Hill... an all-American ass whoop'in.

With no coherent plan. The Republicans won 2010 for the same reason the Democrats won 2006. Neither was decisive.

Yeah... that's why the Dead Kennedy seat went to an R before Dead Kennedy's body was cold. The ignorant... I mean the youth vote is never large.

Clearly you are ignorant of the youth vote in 2008. Not to mention ignorant in everything else. 4.3 million additional youth voted in 2008.

It's always overestimated. It's not a wonder they want the ignorant youth to vote.

Better then ignorant people like you.

Keep trying to spin... it was an a historic ass kicking. Hell, even the left couldn't deny it.

Where historic means anything you want it to be. You failed to define your terms and now you accuse me of twisting words you never stated. How can I twist something that never existed? More Zimmer Fail.

First... they voted for Republicans in massive numbers... not just federally but at the state level. And Krauthammer backed up my game changing charge; that Dems seeking survival will go along with R's on key votes. The Tea Party movement isn't dead... it's just getting rolling.

Thanks for admitting your definition of decisive is only numbers.

Frankly your word cannot be trusted.

Better then you. You can't be trusted. Furthermore, those who say that are those who lose to me. Do you ever see RightinNYC say that? No. Because my foot isn't down his throat all of the time. You bitch because you can never win.

You're a snake who has difficulty correctly referencing what others have stated, so why in the world should I believe you on this?

Good luck proving that. Oh wait. You can't.

ROTFLOL... I've listed the arguments you've gotten your ass kicked. You hit about as often as Charlie Brown.

Actually you listed arguments where I turned you into ground beef, shaped you into a a patty, put you on a grill and had lunch. Your inability to understand and process basic English much less logic is why you declare victory when everyone else sees you gasping for air as someone has their boot on your throat.

Look at the election... if they thought them as worthless as the Dems, the election wouldn't have been historic and decisive.

Too bad 49% think the GOP is just as worthless as the Democrats.

If they behave like Dems it's over. No question.

Clearly you never bothered to read what he said. Typical Zimmer Fail. Lazy.

Well, no... I'm not the one on meds, or has anger management problems... as you admitted... being angry 95% of the time.

Still can't kick that compulsive liar problem I see?

Yep... Republicans have been pushing for unconstitutional healthkare for ages... that's why they signed on to HillaryKare in 1994. Oh snap! They didn't?

Changing the subject to avoid admitting you were wrong eh? Once again, this is why you can never be defined as honest. Rather then admit that Republicans have indeed come up with the original mandate, you run away like a coward. Because, frankly you are a coward.

I see it went far... and it's been their platform for 100-years. People make mistakes... even republicans... but a bit of communism as their platform for a century? No. That's the SAPs.

Nice fallacy of raising the bar there. New moniker: Zimmer the Dishonest Fail.

What's honesty? Don't ask Zimmer. He hasn't got a clue.

Nixon wasn't a conservative.

Again, use of fallacy of raising the bar.

You said this "Forcing people to by insurance, and fining them if they do not? That's the Republican's position??? In your mind perhaps."

Nixon was a Republican president. Now you go and use more dishonesty. I used to think Goobie was the most dishonest poster here. He's a boy scout compared to you.

he's responsible for the EPA among other idiocy

I guess you think arsenic in your water and particulates in your air are fine. :peace

but they certainly haven't been proponents of ObamaKare for a century.

Again "Forcing people to by insurance, and fining them if they do not? That's the Republican's position??? In your mind perhaps."

More dishonest from Zimmer Fail.

LOL... the election was decisive... historic, game changing, and anomalies do not a party platform make.

To which your stated definition is numbers and numbers alone.

You completely ignore how the public views the GOP was poorly as the Democrats.
You completely ignore how the GOP has no bloody plan.
You completely ignore how the public polls show little support for actual GOP agenda items.

HACK. You. Are.

You grasped at straws... and once again got your ass kicked.

See above. Btw, I'm off to clean my boots. :2wave:

You have a nasty habit of accusing others of lying, when you are the meister of inserting words into people's mouths they never stated, and twisting their arguments out of proportion
.

Wrong again. Your demonstrated inability to comprehend basic logic and utilize critical thinking is largely why you accuse me of such slander. I merely take your argument's logic to show why your argument is effectively worthless. Due to your inability to follow this due to various reasons, you think I'm twisting words. You clearly lack the capacity to follow your own logic to its conclusion. No one here has agreed with you on that position, even in the basement. You are basically an exceptionally poor debater with no real comprehension of argumentation.

It's a mental deficiency, it's a sign of dishonesty at an amazing level because it is ever recurring... it is your MO and it is known DP-wide. It's sad, but it's your and your family's problem.

Too bad you can't prove that.

You can't win an argument. So you invent ******* reasons to attack your opponent on. Quite sad really.
 
There you go again, quoting selectively and out of context. That wasn't all I said. Absurd, indeed.

Well, what can you expect from a dishonest hack?

My position is based on fact, not opinion.

Hence why he has a problem with your position.

The election results clearly divided Congress, and both parties clearly have leadership problems, and the Republicans clearly don't know what the hell to do with the Tea Party movement.

Ah, but you forget, the only criteria Zimmer will accept here is numbers. Nothing else matters to him. But note his massive raging hypocrisy about the 2006 election.
 
Which to you means nothing but numbers. You don't even define your own criteria.
63 House seats... ass kickings in the states... picking up 7-senate seats since Brown's win. Nah... not decisive. Only in the mind of a moron. Hell... even the leftists admitted it was an ass kicking of historic proportions and a decisive victory.

I guess that's why the Libs aren't in disarray, and Obama is gunning for a fight, and have Dems turning on Dems.

Stopping the idiocy on the left is game changing alone. That it will bend many in the senate worried about 2012... the R's holed the chamber that sets the course when a whole rash of seats... is like kind. But hey! LOL... you don't think it' decisive or historic!

Psssssssssst> That's not only the numbers if you had read my previous posts... but no... you like to play your deviant games.

The youth vote in 2008 was an anomaly... not normal... Cult Induced... get it? It was an anomaly...just as the other crap you posted and tried to pass for a longtime Repulican platform.
Once again... illustrating you are the devious and deviant one.

As you were...

From one of the left's favorite sources.
A decisive victory is an indisputable military victory of a battle that determines or significantly influences the ultimate result of a conflict.
Decisive victory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doh... no the election wasn't an indisputable victory for the right, won't significantly influeunce the idiocy the left has foisted upon us.

Really? ... you and T.E.D. are a match.


Too bad you can't prove that.

You can't win an argument. So you invent ******* reasons to attack your opponent on. Quite sad really.
ROTFLOL... you've had your ass kicked... just as you had with taxes (where you did youself in ... in your very first post... LOL), shoe boxes for cars, Bremen, the autobahn... any time we've matched up... your ass gets kicked... Go to the basement, that's where you've been laid bare for the word twisting, word inserting, angry 95% of the time deviant you are. Or do you suffer from terminal amnesia?

.
 
Last edited:
Wow. Thanks Zimmer for explicitly coming out and arguing that my argument was indeed true. You infer I'm an idiot and then repeat my argument about your argument. Way to go there kiddo.

Your sole criteria is numbers. Nothing else matters to you. Hence why your posts are worthless. There's nothing resembling critical thinking going on. It's basically a self engaged partisan circle jerk.

The "arguments" you are citing are merely more evidence that you only view what you wish to view. Anyone can go look up those arguments and see you running away cowardly from my posts' content.

And the wiki link doesn't support your argument. The Dems smashed the GOP in 2006. Was that decisive? Numbers alone do not decide if something was decisive or not. It's a sad fact you can't grasp that.
 
Last edited:
Wow. Thanks Zimmer for explicitly coming out and arguing that my argument was indeed true. You infer I'm an idiot and then repeat my argument about your argument. Way to go there kiddo.

Your sole criteria is numbers. Nothing else matters to you. Hence why your posts are worthless. There's nothing resembling critical thinking going on. It's basically a self engaged partisan circle jerk.

The "arguments" you are citing are merely more evidence that you only view what you wish to view. Anyone can go look up those arguments and see you running away cowardly from my posts' content.

And the wiki link doesn't support your argument. The Dems smashed the GOP in 2006. Was that decisive? Numbers alone do not decide if something was decisive or not. It's a sad fact you can't grasp that.

Doh... the numbers illustrate a decisive victory. A historic one.
They are game changing. Behaviour altering. Course changing.

I'll side with Krauthammer... or I should say he sided with me... and you and T.E.D. can cling bitterly to your hilarious premise.

PS. You are an idiot; a word inserting in to the mouths that others never stated, word twisting, all-around devious idiot.

.
 
Last edited:
Senate Dem leader drops nearly $1.3T spending bill

Elections, especially decisive and game changing elections have consequences.

.

Oh come on Zimmer. It's all a wash, there is no difference, and if you think it is like the majority who voted/shifted power in November, then you are sorely mistaken. The pie will never be split evenly, the rich FAT CATS will always control everything, and our super efficient government will not be able to run properly now.
 
Oh come on Zimmer. It's all a wash, there is no difference, and if you think it is like the majority who voted/shifted power in November, then you are sorely mistaken. The pie will never be split evenly, the rich FAT CATS will always control everything, and our super efficient government will not be able to run properly now.

That wasn't the argument, and the political cleansing has begun.

But let's delve into your idiocy for a moment: The pie will never be split evenly.Why should it be? The good news is the pie isn't finite... it's en expanding pie when the government removes its burdensome, intrusive self.

There are some motivated to lead, take risks and work half days... meaning 12-hours per day, while others will sit on the sofa, drink beer and watch the idiot box.

That's life... as each chooses, so shall be the rewards, and there is no guarantee the motivated worker will be rewarded. That's life too. But usually... if you decide to take life easy, and look to government... life will be hard on you.

You cannot have government steal from one group and spread the wealth around and expect a healthy society.

You mind if I walk into your home, take your food, gas money, TV and a little spending money? That's what Dems foment, using the faceless government as the robber.

.
 
Last edited:
Doh... the numbers illustrate a decisive victory. A historic one.
They are game changing. Behaviour altering. Course changing.

lol. You know, you argued I was wrong for characterizing your argument as purely based on numbers and then you come out and agree with my assertion that your entire argument is based purely on numbers. Good job there kiddo. Clearly, you are a product of the American Public Education system.

And the recent bills passed, including earmarks suggest otherwise. Not to mention the GOP agreed to an additional $400 million + per year to the deficit for the next 2 years.

I'll side with Krauthammer... or I should say he sided with me... and you and T.E.D. can cling bitterly to your hilarious premise.

You agreed with my premise. Furthermore, I doubt Krauthammer said anything of what you claim. You clearly do not understand the basic English language in its written form.

PS. You are an idiot; a word inserting in to the mouths that others never stated, word twisting, all-around devious idiot.

.

I'm the idiot..but you agreed with my assertion on your posts? Really. Wow. Btw, you've been reported.
 
lol. You know, you argued I was wrong for characterizing your argument as purely based on numbers and then you come out and agree with my assertion that your entire argument is based purely on numbers.
Here we go again. You trying to twist the argument as you always do. You are a hopeless mental case.

I made both cases. The numbers do indicate a decisive, game changing and historic victory. It was an all-American ass kicking of the Kool-Aid President and his Marxist agenda.

I also made the case that they will bend votes, and Krauthammer took the same position.

You thick or what? Good try... you're still the strike out king Charlie Brown. You want to try on taxes, autobahns, shoe boxes for cars...? Swing and a miss... swing and a miss... fouled off his own forehead... swing and a miss... and back to the dugout you go.

You agreed with my premise. Furthermore, I doubt Krauthammer said anything of what you claim.
ROTFLOL... of course you don't believe Krauthammer said anything of the kind... because once again you got your ass kicked.

You clearly do not understand the basic English language in its written form.
You mean like decisive? ROTFLOL.


Btw, you've been reported.
No **** Sherlock... the post has been up for quite a while, and all of a sudden comes a PM around the time of your post... ROTFLOL... it was worth the 3-points... hell, I just might double down LOL... for these points are like Censure in Congress. They're meaningless... EXCEPT for the fact they reveal you for what you are.

So have at it Junior... hit the silly button again! ROTFLOL.

.
 
Last edited:
Here you go Junior, once again kicking your ass. Don't you ever tire of taking a beating?
[video]http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/12/12/krauthammer_responds_to_shout-out_from_bill_clinton.html[/video]
Krauthammer making my case from the 4:06 to the 4:22 mark

"Republicans have control of the House and have operational control of the Senate. There are over 20 Democratic senators up to be elected in two years and there is a large group of the who will side with the Republicans on issues like this. They want to be re-elected. If you have control of the house, and defacto control of the Senate..."

December 12, 2010

The election... by the numbers was decisive, historic and... game changing.

T.E.D. repeatedly tried to make a case that it wasn't game changing, wasn't decisive, and wasn't historic (all which are laughable propositions), and you ran to his rescue only to end up getting shot in the face... once again. You remind me of this character from T2.

Though Lt. Hauk is a fitting handle, I think T-1000 might be better... because your getting shot in the face just doesn't seem to faze you.



.
 
Last edited:
T.E.D. repeatedly tried to make a case that it wasn't game changing, wasn't decisive, and wasn't historic (all which are laughable propositions), and you ran to his rescue only to end up getting shot in the face... once again. You remind me of this character from T2.

You just can't stop bringing me up even when you aren't talking to me. I think somebody's developing a little man-crush on yours truly. :lol:

My arguments were specifically with reference to the terms decisive first, and historic second. I never even bothered with "game changing" because you could argue that any election where one side or the other lost so much as a single election was "game changing."

I clearly demonstrated that the election wasn't decisive based on the fact that neither party controls Congress come January.

I agreed that it was historic, if by historic you're talking about from how far behind the Republicans had to come just to split Congress down the middle with the Democrats.

You, having no substantive argument to counter the cold hard facts of the situation as it stands, have resorted to laughing at me by associating me with someone else you're laughing at.

It is most unfortunate that you're running so low on gas that this is the best you can do.

Though Lt. Hauk is a fitting handle, I think T-1000 might be better... because your getting shot in the face just doesn't seem to faze you.



That's not a valid point.

That's self-diagnosis. :lol:
 
Moderator's Warning:
Zimmer is now thread banned.
 
Here we go again. You trying to twist the argument as you always do. You are a hopeless mental case.

Doh... the numbers illustrate a decisive victory. A historic one.
They are game changing. Behaviour altering. Course changing.

WOW. Either Zimmer is a compulsive liar or he's entirely incapable of understanding the written form of English.

I argue his sole criteria is numbers to which he accuses me of twisting his words except that he outright stated all he was looking at was numbers. I guess repeating his argument makes me twisting his words. Crazy.

I made both cases. The numbers do indicate a decisive, game changing and historic victory. It was an all-American ass kicking of the Kool-Aid President and his Marxist agenda.

Again, solely based on numbers which doesn't actually mean much. I guess pointing out his entire argument rested on numbers and Zimmer stating he was looking just as numbers makes me dishonest. Therefore, if I actually fabricate an argument he never made, I'm honest.

Methinks Zimmer may have a problem worthy of a neurological visit.

I also made the case that they will bend votes, and Krauthammer took the same position.

Similar to what Rubio say? LOL. Not.

Zimmer's posting worthless? Not news.
 
The guy was thread banned. bashing him after he is gone is lame IMHO
 
Back
Top Bottom