samsmart
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2009
- Messages
- 10,315
- Reaction score
- 6,470
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
The fire department was totally in the right for not putting out that fire.
1) While the homeowner's local government did not provide a fire department, an adjoining local government offered the services of the fire department for a $75 fee. The homeowner could have gotten it at any time.
2) The fire department must intervene if a life is in danger. But everybody was out of the home, and so nobody's life was in danger from the fire.
The blame can only be put on two:
1) The homeowner for not paying the $75 for the service.
2) The homeowner's local government for not bringing in tax revenue for fire department service.
In absolutely no way is the fire department at fault or to blame in this particular scenario.
1) While the homeowner's local government did not provide a fire department, an adjoining local government offered the services of the fire department for a $75 fee. The homeowner could have gotten it at any time.
2) The fire department must intervene if a life is in danger. But everybody was out of the home, and so nobody's life was in danger from the fire.
The blame can only be put on two:
1) The homeowner for not paying the $75 for the service.
2) The homeowner's local government for not bringing in tax revenue for fire department service.
In absolutely no way is the fire department at fault or to blame in this particular scenario.