• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay Marriage, is it right to stop it? (PART II)

Gay Marriage, is it right to stop it? (PART II)


  • Total voters
    154
please continue deflecting and getting owned

so now if you will, in your next post please link/state these facts that support your failed, laughable claims or dodge and lose again

good thing others dont have the same failed logic you do
" im going to yell at my school tomorrow, i dont want them teaching that old math that 2+2=4 when i know it equals five and they better not tell my kid all the left-handed people, redheaded people, blacks and or Catholic people and jewish people are normal!
how dare they!!!!! they are taking sides!!!!"

so true




MY STATEMENT OF POST 548 AND THE PROOF BEHIND IT.

i am sorry you are not able to determine, that i have not taken a position on whether homosexuality is normal or abnormal....in fact i have been neutral on the subject..........that is a fact i have stated at least 2 to 3 times.

for your info again, i have stated "why you you believe you have the facts, and someone with a different point of view then yours,...are said not to have facts, what leads you to believe only you can have facts, and why should they come before anyone else whom you and others dismiss?



HERES THE PROOF:

ladies and gentlemen, time to turn back the pages of time. i started at post 375.

post 380
understand please I am taking not stand in this thread of is homosexuality right or wrong.

NEUTRAL POSITION

POST 488

is homosexuality normal or abnormal..............i myself have not taken a position on it in this thread, but you have.
NEUTRAL POSITION

POST 404


I stated want i see here from each of you, you belive your side has the facts.

However you believing that does not make it fact

other people believe things they consider facts also, which are opposite of yours.

So you wish to count your own facts and discard theirs, well in your own world, you can do that, however in the public domain you dont get to put what you belive to be facts put on a pedestal, and everyone ahere to them.

POST 425

you don't get to determine what facts are, there are facts....however they may not rest on your side of the argument.

POST 428

you misunderstand, I am not putting forth facts on the issue from me, you have a position you hold this issue.

other people than yourself hold a different position than yours.

well what makes your position correct, and others position incorrect.

if you hold that government can put forth a position you believe in, than government can put forth a position you don't believe in.

POST 435

oh how do you know you have the facts?

where did you obtain knowledge that you know you do.



THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR, ..for those who like to say i have taken a position on homosexuality...i have not

i have people who believe and say they have all of the facts, however its only their point of view, and someone else who disagrees with them on if they really have the facts.... they dismiss that person.........rather a one sided argument dont you think?
 
Last edited:
MY STATEMENT OF POST 548 AND THE PROOF BEHIND IT.

i am sorry you are not able to determine, that i have not taken a position on whether homosexuality is normal or abnormal....in fact i have been neutral on the subject..........that is a fact i have stated at least 2 to 3 times.

for your info again, i have stated "why you you believe you have the facts, and someone with a different point of view then yours,...are said not to have facts, what leads you to believe only you can have facts, and why should they come before anyone else whom you and others dismiss?



HERES THE PROOF:

ladies and gentlemen, time to turn back the pages of time. i started at post 375.

post 380


NEUTRAL POSITION

POST 488


NEUTRAL POSITION

POST 404




POST 425



POST 428



POST 435





THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR, ..for those who like to say i have taken a position on homosexuality...i have not

i have people who believe and say they have all of the facts, however its only their point of view, and someone else who disagrees with them.... they say does not have any facts.........rather a one side argument dont you think?
blha blah blah
you lost, you got destoryed, not only did your posts step into CCs tarp you fell throught it broke your back, the tarped wrapped around you and other posters proceeded kicking your posts while they were down


sorry your obvioualy deflection failed, playing games wont work, the thread is here for all to see

but since you are so desperate to save face ill play, simple question

The info CC provided was it fact or not, yes or no

any other answer will expose your dishonesty furth and i cant wait to see if you man up and give an honest answer or try and deflect and continue the beat down of your posts, i hope you do that later because its hilarious.

again
The info CC provided was it fact or not, yes or no
 
blha blah blah
you lost, you got destoryed, not only did your posts step into CCs tarp you fell throught it broke your back, the tarped wrapped around you and other posters proceeded kicking your posts while they were down


sorry your obvioualy deflection failed, playing games wont work, the thread is here for all to see

but since you are so desperate to save face ill play, simple question

The info CC provided was it fact or not, yes or no

any other answer will expose your dishonesty furth and i cant wait to see if you man up and give an honest answer or try and deflect and continue the beat down of your posts, i hope you do that later because its hilarious.

again
The info CC provided was it fact or not, yes or no

sorry i did not take on CC request, so how could i step into it.......sorry agent j

was the info capt CC post fact of fiction.........answer the question agent j , since you believe it to me.......i have not stated it is or it isnt..........you fill in the blank.

please continue droning.
 
sorry i did not take on CC request, so how could i step into it.......sorry agent j

was the info capt CC post fact of fiction.........answer the question agent j , since you believe it to me.......i have not stated it is or it isnt..........you fill in the blank.

please continue droning.

BOOM!, THATS WHAT I THOUGHT

you got nothing, once again you are exposed

couldnt answer the simple question

this is where your word games failed every time and nobody bought it they blasted your failed posts.

Opinions dont matter, feelings dont matter, beliefs dont matter to the FACTS

thanks you for destroying yourself and proving your posts have no integrity, watching this beat down of your posts has been GREAT entertainment

facts were presented and your continuous denial of them is what got your posts destroyed by CC and others.
thanks for playing you lose again to the facts presented

but please continue deflecting and getting owned
let us know when you have anythign to support your failed destoryed claims, we are waiting, hell give us ONE thing that supports you . . . . ONE
 
The poll results imply that we do not have as many "libertarians" on this forum as I thought.
 
BOOM!, THATS WHAT I THOUGHT

you got nothing, once again you are exposed

couldnt answer the simple question

LOL.....i thought you said i stepped into CC'S TRAP .....

i didn't need to answer the question becuase i didnt take a postion, and i did not makes claims i had facts ......why do i need to answer?




this is where your word games failed every time and nobody bought it they blasted your failed posts.

Opinions dont matter, feelings dont matter, beliefs dont matter to the FACTS

thanks you for destroying yourself and proving your posts have no integrity, watching this beat down of your posts has been GREAT entertainment

facts were presented and your continuous denial of them is what got your posts destroyed by CC and others.
thanks for playing you lose again to the facts presented

but please continue deflecting and getting owned
let us know when you have anythign to support your failed destoryed claims, we are waiting, hell give us ONE thing that supports you . . . . ONE

please continue....[droning].... with your beliefs that you and only you can determine what facts are and no one who holds a different point of view than you can.

move along! move along!
 
LOL.....i thought you said i stepped into CC'S TRAP .....

i didn't need to answer the question becuase i didnt take a postion, and i did not makes claims i had facts ......why do i need to answer?






please continue....[droning].... with your beliefs that you and only you can determine what facts are and no one who holds a different point of view than you can.

move along! move along!

still got nothing and your posts are still getting destroyed, thats what i thought
yeah yeah when CC presented facts and you said that he didnt and he only believes he did 100 times that didnt really meant anythign FAIL
your posts took the first round knock out and now its just fun watching you deny that and kicking your posts while they are down

heres the biggest failure yet, you post a lie and claim you are not taking a stance but say this "your beliefs that you and only you can determine what facts are and no one who holds a different point of view than you can."
this is what got you destroyed in CCs posts, my posts and others. Nobody is talking about beliefs this is why you continue to lose, its this completely failed argument that exposes your posts for the mentally retarded logical and failed deflection they are. I hope you never stop doubling down on this because its this exact thing that got your posts destroyed. Its hilarious.

tell us in your next post about beliefs and opinions and feelings when nobody is talking about that stuff, maybe NEXT post somebody will believe you. Oh my god i cant stop laughing.

this is where your word games failed every time, nobody bought it they blasted your failed posts.

Opinions dont matter, feelings dont matter, beliefs dont matter to the FACTS

thanks you for destroying yourself and proving your posts have no integrity, watching this beat down of your posts has been GREAT entertainment

facts were presented and your continuous denial of them is what got your posts destroyed by CC and others.
thanks for playing you lose again to the facts presented

but please continue deflecting and getting owned
let us know when you have anythign to support your failed destroyed claims, we are waiting, hell give us ONE thing that supports you . . . . ONE
 
still got nothing and your posts are still getting destroyed, thats what i thought
yeah yeah when CC presented facts and you said that he didnt and he only believes he did 100 times that didnt really meant anythign FAIL
your posts took the first round knock out and now its just fun watching you deny that and kicking your posts while they are down

heres the biggest failure yet, you post a lie and claim you are not taking a stance but say this "your beliefs that you and only you can determine what facts are and no one who holds a different point of view than you can."
this is what got you destroyed in CCs posts, my posts and others. Nobody is talking about beliefs this is why you continue to lose, its this completely failed argument that exposes your posts for the mentally retarded logical and failed deflection they are. I hope you never stop doubling down on this because its this exact thing that got your posts destroyed. Its hilarious.

tell us in your next post about beliefs and opinions and feelings when nobody is talking about that stuff, maybe NEXT post somebody will believe you. Oh my god i cant stop laughing.

this is where your word games failed every time, nobody bought it they blasted your failed posts.

Opinions dont matter, feelings dont matter, beliefs dont matter to the FACTS

thanks you for destroying yourself and proving your posts have no integrity, watching this beat down of your posts has been GREAT entertainment

facts were presented and your continuous denial of them is what got your posts destroyed by CC and others.
thanks for playing you lose again to the facts presented

but please continue deflecting and getting owned
let us know when you have anythign to support your failed destroyed claims, we are waiting, hell give us ONE thing that supports you . . . . ONE

......move along move along!
 
droning?........... move along move along!

failed deflection 62, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not only am I looking for your opinion im looking for your reasoning if your answer is yes.

I have discussed gay marriage many many times and have yet to hear ONE sound, reasonable, logical, non-bias, non-selfish, non-arrogant, non-hypercritical, non anti-american reason to "Stop" gay marriage. Almost every reason I have ever heard was also used about women’s rights, equal rights, interracial marriage etc. the reason were dumb illogical then and the most certainly still are today, even more so since not only common sense and facts proves them wrong but history.

Really? Not a single one?


Reasonable? By what you only will call reasonable?

Logical? The law is often not logical.

Non-biased? Every one has a bias even those who are "right" have a bias.

Non-selfish? What does selfishness have to do whether it is right to have SSM or not?

Non-arrogant? While arrogance may blind one to reality it does not necessitate it nor if you are "right" doesn't mean you are not arrogant. Hint. Hint.

Non-hypercritical? While having a contrary point of view would have an appearance of being critical, it doesn't follow that having a contrary point of view being hypercritical nor would having a agreement to SSM would not mean that they would not be hypercritical or just critical.

Non-anti American? So if someone has a particular view and it opposes something that you believe it then becomes anti-American?


now mind you, pay attention to my verbiage, I said reason to STOP it.

That means in America I think its fine for anybody to:
THINK its wrong, gross or offensive etc
TEACH its wrong gross or offensive etc
PREACH its wrong gross or offensive etc
BELIEVE its wrong gross or offensive etc
FEEL its wrong gross or offensive etc
etc

This is called setting up straw man arguments. I do not expect that the majority of people who are opposed to SSM would necessarily fall under these.

and i also believe and support in your rights to do so but once you try to stop it I think you wrong on so many levels.
I can’t imagine how AMERICANS think they have the right to tell two CONSENTING ADULTS who and who they cant marry lmao

Marriages exist for certain reasons some of which do not involve the couple directly. They would include making an environment be more to care for offspring (which benefits society as a whole) Allowing society to define limits and rights and responsibilities on conduct of persons in a family group. This again benefits society.

Irregardless how you can put it, having SSM requires the change of the definition of marriage and since marriage is very much a societal institution it would require an agreement thought society to agree to the change. It cannot be imposed by courts or just legislation since you want to override the States that would oppose SSM. This will require an Amendment to the Constitution.



Does it get anymore pompous, arrogant, selfish, hypercritical and anti american than that. How anybody thinks they have the right to tell a consenting adult they cant marry another consenting adult is beyond me.

Individually people can have sex with any willing partner that can give consent, they can go to orgies, or engage in any weird activity if it suits their purposes. People can live together if they want. However, marriage is an institution and is not something that one should engage in just because that would be convenient. It has a definition of being between one man and one woman and if you want to expand that between any two people (who are not 1st degree relatives) then it is incumbent for you and those who favor SSM to put up arguments to expand that definition and just saying it is your "Right" to do so or that since that people of diffrent races were banned and now is wrong means that we should just accept it will not pass muster. You need to show that it should be changed an you must understand that you cannot just go thru the courts to do so.


Also to be clear Im also not saying its wrong for you to VOTE on the subject everybody has that right of course.

Thank you for your consideration.

I myself am not gay so I REALLY feel its non of my business but has an american I have to call BS on the other so called americans that do think its there business some how.

Perhaps you should consider to what extent just about everything has become everyone's business and how and thru what processes it became that way.

Anyway maybe this time will be different, it’ll actually be VERY interesting if it is different. So does anybody have ONE sound, reasonable, logical, non-bais, non-selfish, non-arrogant, non-hypercritical, non anti-american reason to "Stop" gay marriage.

It is a change in the definition on what marriage means. For more than a thousand years it has meant such there needs to be considerable discussion and argument to change it. Perhaps a Constitutional Amendment if you want all States being forced to accept it.

Who thinks they have a sound reason why they should get to tell one American consenting adults they cant marry another consenting American adult.

Let any couple do as they will; but you are requiring acceptance that is against the understanding of what marriage is by forcing the issue and there is a lot of legal force with the status of being married.


Also for some reference Ill try to list the general reasons people thought of that have been thoroughly debunked.

Religion/god/bibleMeaningless and debunked

As so long as churches are not being forced to do marriages then this is not an issue.


Slipper slope argument: I should be able to marry my dog, pedophiles marring children etc. – Ludicrous and debunked

This is an issue to an extent since once the door is open to gay marriage the proponents to the others will try. not succeed but try, to promote and validate their ideals.


Marriage is between a man and woman – this is a lie/opinion. Meaningless and debunked

WRONG. From the point of Western culture this is the definition. And if there is anything that can be agree ed upon is the US is Western in its views.

Morals – your morals are subjective, shouldn’t be forced on others and your morals aren’t effected one bit, you still get to believe in them as you see fit. Meaningless and debunked

Morals are meaningless with respect to marriage since it is an institution that has strict parameters for what it entails. In this morality has no say. Violations are a matter of law and not morals.

Gay Parents will “turn” their kids gay – LMAO this is also a uneducated fantasy. It has been proven that that children raised by gay parents are no more likely to be or not be gay. It has also been proven that children raised in a multi-parent home on average do better than a single parent home no matter the sex. Ignorant and debunked

You can have this one.

Churches will lose their rights – another silly argument that appeals to emotion and could probably be added under the “slipper slope” argument as well. Churches are already protected and will never lose their rights, they discriminate RIGHT NOW against who they want including STRAIGHT couples and will be able to continue to do so under the first amendment. Ludicrous and debunked

The problem is that there are people who belive that Churches should have no rights and be merely hollow extensions of the society in general or that of the State. And they too like to use the Courts to bypass the problems that would occur with trying to legislate.

[/QUOTE]Alright heres the most current update and lets have fun!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICIAL COUNTER
how many sound, reasonable, logical, non-bias, non-selfish, non-arrogant, non-hypercritical, non anti-american reason are there to "Stop" gay marriage

GOOD REASONS: 0[/QUOTE]
 
failed deflection 62, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?
he presents things he says are facts, many other people in our nation, state they have facts which are counter to his.

so I didn't state he is right or wrong, I stated just because he states something is fact ,does not make it so.
 
he presents things he says are facts, many other people in our nation, state they have facts which are counter to his.

so I didn't state he is right or wrong, I stated just because he states something is fact ,does not make it so.

failed deflection 63, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?
 
failed deflection 63, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?




he presents things he says are facts, many other people in our nation, state they have facts which are counter to his.
 
1.)Really? Not a single one?
2.)Reasonable? By what you only will call reasonable?
3.) Logical? The law is often not logical.
4.)Non-biased? Every one has a bias even those who are "right" have a bias.
5.)Non-selfish? What does selfishness have to do whether it is right to have SSM or not?
6.) Non-arrogant? While arrogance may blind one to reality it does not necessitate it nor if you are "right" doesn't mean you are not arrogant. Hint. Hint.
7.) Non-hypercritical? While having a contrary point of view would have an appearance of being critical, it doesn't follow that having a contrary point of view being hypercritical nor would having a agreement to SSM would not mean that they would not be hypercritical or just critical.
8.) Non-anti American? So if someone has a particular view and it opposes something that you believe it then becomes anti-American?
9.)This is called setting up straw man arguments. I do not expect that the majority of people who are opposed to SSM would necessarily fall under these.
10.)Marriages exist for certain reasons some of which do not involve the couple directly. They would include making an environment be more to care for offspring (which benefits society as a whole) Allowing society to define limits and rights and responsibilities on conduct of persons in a family group. This again benefits society.
11.)Irregardless how you can put it, having SSM requires the change of the definition of marriage and since marriage is very much a societal institution it would require an agreement thought society to agree to the change. It cannot be imposed by courts or just legislation since you want to override the States that would oppose SSM. This will require an Amendment to the Constitution.
12.) Individually people can have sex with any willing partner that can give consent, they can go to orgies, or engage in any weird activity if it suits their purposes. People can live together if they want. However, marriage is an institution and is not something that one should engage in just because that would be convenient. It has a definition of being between one man and one woman and if you want to expand that between any two people (who are not 1st degree relatives) then it is incumbent for you and those who favor SSM to put up arguments to expand that definition and just saying it is your "Right" to do so or that since that people of diffrent races were banned and now is wrong means that we should just accept it will not pass muster. You need to show that it should be changed an you must understand that you cannot just go thru the courts to do so.
13.)Thank you for your consideration.
14.)Perhaps you should consider to what extent just about everything has become everyone's business and how and thru what processes it became that way.
15.) It is a change in the definition on what marriage means. For more than a thousand years it has meant such there needs to be considerable discussion and argument to change it. Perhaps a Constitutional Amendment if you want all States being forced to accept it.
16.) Let any couple do as they will; but you are requiring acceptance that is against the understanding of what marriage is by forcing the issue and there is a lot of legal force with the status of being married.
17.)As so long as churches are not being forced to do marriages then this is not an issue.
18.)This is an issue to an extent since once the door is open to gay marriage the proponents to the others will try. not succeed but try, to promote and validate their ideals.
19.)WRONG. From the point of Western culture this is the definition. And if there is anything that can be agree ed upon is the US is Western in its views.
20.) Morals are meaningless with respect to marriage since it is an institution that has strict parameters for what it entails. In this morality has no say. Violations are a matter of law and not morals.
21.)You can have this one.
22.)The problem is that there are people who belive that Churches should have no rights and be merely hollow extensions of the society in general or that of the State. And they too like to use the Courts to bypass the problems that would occur with trying to legislate.
23.)Alright heres the most current update and lets have fun!

1.) yes really not one
2.) not infringing on somebody equal rights, not discriminating against them simply because its icky, not forcing your morality opn others etc.
3.) this is true sometimes it nots
4.) false
5.) see #2
6.) see #2
7.) see #2
8.) of course not
9.) no its not at all, please look up the definition of a strawman and it not even close. strawman is stetting up and weak or false argument that wasnt made and arguing agaisnt that and claiming victory.

What i did is make sure people were very clear what i was talking about.

also you must be a rookie to this discussion because LOTS of people will QUICKLY jump on this list and say freedom of speech and i have the right to say and teach my child what i want and my church can say its a sin if its wants yadda yadda yadda

THOSE are actually the real strawman and my list stops trolls and dishonest people from using them. Glad i could clear that up for you

10.) we are sticking to facts and the facts is marriage is a legal contract. period. but to address your concern i could give you a very long list of doctors, physiologists etc that endorse gay adoption and gay families raising children.

11.) factual false since its already happening and it will continue to happen and gay marriage was around BC. this is about rights and equality. Society is not needed on this issues just like it wasn't needed for equal rights for minorities and women and just like it wasnt needed for interracial marriage. 80% of the country was against interracial marriage when loving vs Virginia was ruled on. It IS being imposed and will not need an amendment.

12.) weird good thing that not what i said (convenience) and its definition is not one man one woman as already proven. that was some of the legal restrictions but not its definition. ALso we already have shown it needs changed and the courts are already doing it.

13.) you welcome, just stopping people from using more failed strawman arguments
14.) for marriage this is already done, fact is my marriage is none of you business, law made it that way so do other personal reason that are subjective
15.) again please stick to the facts, it will not need an amendment just like interracial marriage didnt
16.) this is a lie, acceptance has nothing to do with it. Ita about rights and equality and ending discrimination. DOes everybody accept that different races, genders, religion and marriages right now? nope, nor are they required too. Please dont use this failed straw-man again its been tried.
17.) they are not and cant be. also why this obvious straw-man is a complete failure i already pointed out. if possible this would already be at risk without gay marriage.
18.) they were trying before this and im sure they will try after but thats not what a slippery slope argument is. If thats all it took for a slippery slope argument then the constitution itself is one big slippery slope. BUT thats not the case. SO NO, its not an issue because take gay marriage away and your example still exists.
19.) nope its a fact already proven, trying to change the argument and reframe it to suit your needs is a failure. Are we to keep everything that was in western culture? like i said meaningless when talking about the law, equality and rights.
20.) correct. morals and religion is meaningless to legal marriage
21.) lol thanks but i have them all so far
22.) this isnt a problem has i have never seen one of those people nor does it have to do with this topic at all.
23.) thanks and i did but it seems you are way behind, NOT an insult, a jab at you or your fault. This thread is actually very old and people revived it and many of the things you brought up have already been put to rest, but i never mind talking about them.
 
he presents things he says are facts, many other people in our nation, state they have facts which are counter to his.

and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 63, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?
 
and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 63, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?

I don't know if he did or not, are there people in our world who would have a different point of view then CC and say they have the facts....yes there are.

just because CC says he has the facts does not make them facts for everyone, maybe you think they are, but that's you.

just because some says they have the facts, that does not empower them to override other people who say they have the facts. your side of your claimed facts, does not give you authority
 
I don't know if he did or not, are there people in our world who would have a different point of view then CC and say they have the facts....yes there are.

just because CC says he has the facts does not make them facts for everyone, maybe you think they are, but that's you.

just because some says they have the facts, that does not empower them to override other people who say they have the facts. your side of your claimed facts, does not give you authority

and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 64, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?
 
and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 64, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?

there will be no yes or no from me, because I am not stating he is right or wrong, or can you not figure that out yet?

he and you believe he has the facts...other people would say you don't have the facts and they do.

can only you and CC have facts and no one else can?
 
there will be no yes or no from me, because I am not stating he is right or wrong, or can you not figure that out yet?

he and you believe he has the facts...other people would say you don't have the facts and they do.

can only you and CC have facts and no one else can?

and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 65, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?
 
and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 65, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?

he thinks he did, so do you.....I don't know, ....others would say no.
 
he thinks he did, so do you.....I don't know, ....others would say no.

and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 66, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?
 
and its that exact thinking that makes your post a failure

failed deflection 66, simply stay on topic, stop deflecting and answer the question?

did CC present facts. Yes or no?



must be easy just changing a number.

he thinks he did, so do you.....I don't know, ....others would say no.
 
Back
Top Bottom