- Joined
- Aug 30, 2009
- Messages
- 3,827
- Reaction score
- 1,374
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I didn't say life is fair. I said US society was unfair - unfairer than many others. Get over it.
No society is fair, actually.
I didn't say life is fair. I said US society was unfair - unfairer than many others. Get over it.
No society is fair, actually.
No society is fair, actually.
Rather a shame you can only come up with such an incorrect definition.
I'm not aware I ever said that either. Some societies are fairer than others.
I didn't say life is fair. I said US society was unfair - unfairer than many others. Get over it.
Some societies are fairer to you and yours, you mean...
All of life is a very subjective experience.
your concept of a fair society appears to be one where the hard working and industrious are tasked with taking care of the lazy and untalented.
Truth.
I think I can finish this off with a Heinlein quote.
"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded- here and there, now and then- are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.This is known as "bad luck."
(Thanks to megaprogman.:2razz
Some societies are fairer to you and yours, you mean...
some is rich, and some is poor
that's the way the world is
but i don't believe in lying back
sayin' how bad your luck is
(Joe Strummer RIP)
some is rich, and some is poor
that's the way the world is
but i don't believe in lying back
sayin' how bad your luck is
(Joe Strummer RIP)
No. I'm quite comfortably off now thank you, but I don't resent paying taxes to fund health care, education and public services to help those less fortunate than myself.
You'll be quoting Abba next FFS :roll:
We recently talked about some of this in another thread. I am curious what others think are the driving factors for why the poor, both urban and rural, do so poorly in school.
You are such a saint... You and Princess Di.
Generally, lack of ability leads to lower socio-economic factors. Those that have the ability and motivation aren't slowed much by having to work, they still do well. In general, those that have lower socio-economic status are there because they lack the ability or understanding needed to get out of said situation.
funny you mention ABBA
where did they establish residency to get away from that Uber fair society
Classist scum!
That parasite was not a saint, and if you think I am you should you spend an evening with me and a bottle of vodka, then you'll see the truth.
That parasite was not a saint, and if you think I am you should you spend an evening with me and a bottle of vodka, then you'll see the truth.
I think that's really spelled 'Wodka', moja przyachiel.
Don't such people usually go somewhere they can pay less tax on their fortunes, like they'd starve if they didn't or something?
Truth.
I think I can finish this off with a Heinlein quote.
"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded- here and there, now and then- are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.This is known as "bad luck."
(Thanks to megaprogman.:2razz
ah there's the parasite attitude. the wealthy should be pleased to have their wealth sucked away by people who do nothing to contribute to their wealth
from each according to their ability nonsense