• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should a divorce court be able to forbid one parent to take a child to church?

Should a divorce court be able to forbid one parent to take a child to church?


  • Total voters
    46
Now that is truly, truly stupid. Talk about wasting tax-payer money on a ridiculous case.

There may well be a "contempt of court" case here to answer but how would it (as this is a child law case after all) be in the child's interests for the father to serve any sentence from this case and thus the child lose contact with her father?

Not that I'm saying fathers shouldn't go to prison if they are guilty of a serious crime but this case is supposedly about a child's best interests...

It has nothing to do with the child's best interest. It has everything to do with a racist judge and an obvious challenge to his authority. The judge who made the first ruling needs to be removed from the bench and disbarred. The judge who made the second ruling needs to be removed from the bench and disbarred.

Cook county has serious judicial corruption issues. The Federal Department of Justice needs to step in and start removing these corrupt ass-hat judges from the bench and the practice of law.
 
Back
Top Bottom