• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

South Park Mohammad Censored

Read Thread Questions (Two questions)

  • Q1. Yes

    Votes: 39 88.6%
  • Q1. No

    Votes: 5 11.4%
  • Q1. I don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Q1. Other

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • Q2. Yes

    Votes: 3 6.8%
  • Q2. No

    Votes: 39 88.6%
  • Q2. I don't know

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • Q2. Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    44
I thought that too.

The difference between catholic priests being kiddy fiddlers and my Prophet being a rapist is that one is accurate and the other is not.

"My Prophet?"
 
I wanted to go to the original source of the threat to read it for myself, but I can't. Anonymous, the petulant bunch of children that they are, took the site down with a DDoS attack.

me said:
ATTN: Anonymous

The appropriate response to threats of this sort isn't knocking the site of the Internet. These guys are probably cheap enough to be hosted on a shared server, which means you took down a couple of dozen other sites for the sins of one in particular.

Furthermore, even if they weren't hosted on a shared site, you really think that the appropriate response to people using threats to silence other people is to . . . silence other people?

Irony much?

That said, Comedy Central owns the channel. It's their absolute right to decide what does and does not get broadcast on it. Everybody who is cursing the extremists for having such thin skin and scoffing at CC needs to grow thicker skin themselves.

If you don't like CC's editing (which isn't censorship, btw) then take your own advice and change the channel.
 
Yes, because the age of consent and marriage was exactly the same in Arabia in the 7th century as it is today in the U.S. :roll:

Yeah because a nine year old girl and an old man having sex is a disgusting practice that transcends time. Roll your eyes all you want but child rape is child rape in this century or the very first.

Marriage was often a way to help widows and orphaned girls, more like adoption.

Except thats not what happened here.

That's why they had polygamy too. You don't even know if they had sex.

The hell I don't:


Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

Nice Nowism.

Nice irrelevant post from you.
 
Last edited:
Yeah ... that is not evidence.

Do you have witnesses? Perhaps a statement that she is raped? Hell, you can even go through the Qu'ran to try and find where he raped her. Marriage is not rape, however much you attempt to make it swing the other way.

Don't be obtuse. You know full well what your holy books say about the matter. A 54 year old man having sex with a nine year old girl before she goes back to play with her dolls is child rape no matter what pedophile arrangement was made before some heathen priest.
 
Yeah because a nine year old girl and an old man having sex is a disgusting practice that transcends time. Roll your eyes all you want but child rape is child rape in this century or the very first.



Except thats not what happened here.



The hell I don't



Nice irrelevant post from you.

Not all Muslims follow the hadiths and besides, it is a collecting of writings both during and after Prophet Mohammeds lifetime.
Oh and the Qu'ran is the infallible text, not the hadiths. Not to mention that there is no consensus on her age. Scholars disagree widely on what it is.

And no, Prophet Mohammed did not consumate the marriage at 9 years old.
 
Don't be obtuse. You know full well what your holy books say about the matter. A 54 year old man having sex with a nine year old girl before she goes back to play with her dolls is child rape no matter what pedophile arrangement was made before some heathen priest.

I know what my own holy book says.
And it does not mention sex with a 9 year old girl, perhaps you need to re read it.

I think you are mixing hadiths with surahs.
 
Don't be obtuse. You know full well what your holy books say about the matter. A 54 year old man having sex with a nine year old girl before she goes back to play with her dolls is child rape no matter what pedophile arrangement was made before some heathen priest.

It apparently wasn't child rape in 7th century Arabia. So get over it.
 
That's not what your holy books just stated. :shrug:

HADITHS IS NOT THE QU'RAN.

My goodness.
The Qu'ran is the holy book.
 
It apparently wasn't child rape in 7th century Arabia. So get over it.

Child rape is child rape. Glad to see you approve of child rape as long as it's just a little arabic girl.
 
HADITHS IS NOT THE QU'RAN.

My goodness.
The Qu'ran is the holy book.

Hadiths are taught in tandem with the Qu'ran.

And they state, unequivocally, that Mohammed consummated his marriage with 9 year old Aisha. :shrug:
 
Child rape is child rape.

Well, now we know otherwise.

Glad to see you approve of child rape as long as it's just a little arabic girl.

Now you're just flailing in desperation. See, if I were easily provoked, I'd say something to you that your richly deserve, yet would violate the guidelines. Instead, I'll remind you that this certainly does not mean I approve of such things, and ask for the apology you owe me, and for you to calm down before you say something even more desperate.
 
I thought it was common knowledge I was a Muslim lol

Nah, you don't yell "kill the infidels" enough. That's what Muslims say, I learned it on this board. :mrgreen:

(It's a joke, people).
 
Hadiths are taught in tandem with the Qu'ran.

And they state, unequivocally, that Mohammed consummated his marriage with 9 year old Aisha. :shrug:

Okay, let me try and explain this to you so you can understand.

The hadiths were created so it made the Qu'ran alot more easier to understand. Certain instructions are within the hadiths that are not in the Qu'ran, such as the sayings of Prophet Mohammed and ritual for prayers.

Now.
The Qu'ran supercedes the hadiths as it was inspired by God. Hadiths are merely stories and sayings by a collection of scholars. Very little of it was written during Prophet Mohammeds life so it cannot be confirmed.

Furthermore, not all Muslims accept the hadiths, the entirety of the text is not there making it unreliable.
Other parts have been discarded, the scholar you chose for your "evidence" handpicked certain parts and threw away many others. (He collected about 300000 hadiths and included only about 4000)

If you need me to go more indepth I will be happy to but bottom line is, using the hadith to prove something is pointless as it is dependent on whether the Muslim accepts hadiths to begin with
 
Last edited:
Nah, you don't yell "kill the infidels" enough. That's what Muslims say, I learned it on this board. :mrgreen:

(It's a joke, people).

Yeah, its a shame I do not live up to the sterotype lol
 
Back
Top Bottom