• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should ALL citizens pay income taxes?

Should ALL citizens have to pay income taxes?

  • No, only those who make over the "living wage"

    Votes: 24 35.3%
  • No, only those in the top 10%

    Votes: 3 4.4%
  • Yes, every working person should have to pay.

    Votes: 22 32.4%
  • Other (specify)

    Votes: 19 27.9%

  • Total voters
    68
So? You act like it's the only tax people pay. In terms of total federal liabilities, all but the named group are paying their proportional share compared to wealth.

you can evade all you want but the fact remains, Obama wants to jack up taxes on the group that already pays a disproportionate amount of the taxes--far more than their fair share. Wealth isn't the basis of taxation (once again) it is income.
 
Ok, either go back and actually read what I wrote and refute it with actual logic, or quit wasting my time because all you're doing now is ranting

since your time is so valuable why not do something other than participate on a chat board.

Curious--why do you claim to be a moderate and have a socialist avatar?
 
Last edited:
Because to run even a small government it would have to be more than 10%.

really-was our government small in 1890 or 1900 or 1920?
 
you can evade all you want but the fact remains, Obama wants to jack up taxes on the group that already pays a disproportionate amount of the taxes--far more than their fair share. Wealth isn't the basis of taxation (once again) it is income.

What's "fair?"
 
since your time is so valuable why not do something other than participate on a chat board.
I'd rather not spend my time repeating things to people who are too lazy to read a paragraph.

Curious--why do you claim to be a moderate and have a socialist avatar?
Because I AM a moderate, a Moderate Socialist.
 
It is the income tax that congress uses to pit groups of Americans against each other. It is the income tax that gets discussed in presidential elections.
and I don't recall paying Payroll taxes-the employer does. If your contract says you make 90K a year what is taken from you in payroll taxes

Dude, I don't know how you get paid, but on my pay stub there's a box for payroll taxes (FICA, SS, Medicare/aid, etc). It's usually larger than my income tax withholding.

It is an income tax. It is based on income, but with an upper limit. It goes into the general fund.

The way I, and most people, get paid, it comes out of my check; the employer doesn't pay it.
 
:mrgreen:
I'd rather not spend my time repeating things to people who are too lazy to read a paragraph.

Because I AM a moderate, a Moderate Socialist.

LOL that is like saying one is a benign strain of pancreatic cancer:mrgreen:

socialism is a disease that is ruining america. We need to stamp it out in order to make America great again. socialism is an opiate of the masses the ultra-rich use to whittle down the amount of competition.

Are you part of the Spartacus League?
 
:mrgreen:

LOL that is like saying one is a benign strain of pancreatic cancer:mrgreen:

socialism is a disease that is ruining america. We need to stamp it out in order to make America great again. socialism is an opiate of the masses the ultra-rich use to whittle down the amount of competition.

Are you part of the Spartacus League?
**** this, I have no interest to play intellectual beer pong with someone too lazy to read what I wrote or even stay on topic.
 
Dude, I don't know how you get paid, but on my pay stub there's a box for payroll taxes (FICA, SS, Medicare/aid, etc). It's usually larger than my income tax withholding.

It is an income tax. It is based on income, but with an upper limit. It goes into the general fund.

The way I, and most people, get paid, it comes out of my check; the employer doesn't pay it.


I was going by what the employer pays

the second definition from WIKI

Payroll tax generally refers to two different kinds of similar taxes. The first kind is a tax that employers are required to withhold from employees' pay, also known as withholding, pay-as-you-earn (PAYE), or pay-as-you-go (PAYG) tax. The second kind is a tax that is paid from the employer's own funds and that is directly related to employing a worker, which can consist of a fixed charge or be proportionally linked to an employee's pay.

but SS is not supposed to be a tax according to our dem friends who started that scam-its forced savings. But you are right about that stuff.

most of that is not designed to fund general government operations.
 
**** this, I have no interest to play intellectual beer pong with someone too lazy to read what I wrote or even stay on topic.

I was a national class table tennis player-probably a good idea on your part. Why keep losing. And socialism is a disease, and yes, we need to get rid of it

I have no duty to fund your existence and your life is not a valid claim on others' wealth
 
**** this, I have no interest to play intellectual beer pong with someone too lazy to read what I wrote or even stay on topic.

BTW claiming you are a centrist is dishonest. a moderate "socialist" is still way left in the USA
 
I voted Other, Income should not be taxed.

Ok so here do we money to arm ourselves ? Or are you saying that you want a consumption tax.

BTW comsumption killed a lot of people in the 19th century !!! lol
 
Ok so here do we money to arm ourselves ? Or are you saying that you want a consumption tax.

BTW comsumption killed a lot of people in the 19th century !!! lol

really? we had a pretty good militar before we started having a confiscatory income tax rate. and arming ourselves is actually something the constitution actually authorizes.

I wonder how much taxes the federal government would "need" if the same federal government was restricted to actually obeying the tenth amendment.?
 
really? we had a pretty good militar before we started having a confiscatory income tax rate. and arming ourselves is actually something the constitution actually authorizes.

I wonder how much taxes the federal government would "need" if the same federal government was restricted to actually obeying the tenth amendment.?

The US military was quite small when not in a war untill after WW2
 
The US military was quite small when not in a war untill after WW2

and we didn't have socialist security, and other forms of federally mandated income redistribution nor a full scale operation to create millions of people dependent on government handouts and thus coerced into voting "dem"
 
and we didn't have socialist security, and other forms of federally mandated income redistribution nor a full scale operation to create millions of people dependent on government handouts and thus coerced into voting "dem"

This is such a provably false talking point, I can't believe some uneducated right wingers still try use it. History shows that welfare rolls actually drop when democrats are in charge and the economy improves.
 
:mrgreen:

LOL that is like saying one is a benign strain of pancreatic cancer:mrgreen:

socialism is a disease that is ruining america. We need to stamp it out in order to make America great again. socialism is an opiate of the masses the ultra-rich use to whittle down the amount of competition.

Oh, Jesus Christ on a popsicle stick. :doh
 
and we didn't have socialist security, and other forms of federally mandated income redistribution nor a full scale operation to create millions of people dependent on government handouts and thus coerced into voting "dem"

So the government was small then, like I said.
 
This is such a provably false talking point, I can't believe some uneducated right wingers still try use it. History shows that welfare rolls actually drop when democrats are in charge and the economy improves.

You labor under the delusion that when an administration implements a policy, the results are immediate
 
You labor under the delusion that when an administration implements a policy, the results are immediate

You mean this recession and the deficit spending didn't start the day Obama was sworn in? It seems everyone thinks it did.
 
You mean this recession and the deficit spending didn't start the day Obama was sworn in? It seems everyone thinks it did.
Turn off your television. It may help to disabuse you of such notions.
 
Back
Top Bottom