• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Terrorism

Which of the following do you perceive as terrorism?


  • Total voters
    29

Apocalypse

DEATH TO ANTARCTICA!!!
DP Veteran
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
24,500
Reaction score
8,588
Location
Israel
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Check the actions above that you consider to be acts of terrorism.

[Wait for the poll to come up before posting your bullcrap]





..structure* :2razz:
 
Last edited:
Check the actions above that you consider to be acts of terrorism.

[Wait for the poll to come up before posting your bullcrap]





..structure* :2razz:

I assume that because of his/her nationality, right?
 
I assume that because of his/her nationality, right?
You expect me to tell you the right answer? :shock:

It's a survey, it's there to examine your opinion.
 
An action with the intention of instilling fear/terror in the general populace.
 
I see what you did there, but too late. "Bombing a foreign government's stracture/a foreign army's structure, motivated with political causes" could simply be war. If it is done outside the context of war, then it's terrorism, but in the context of an actual war, it's simply part of war.
 
I see what you did there, but too late. "Bombing a foreign government's stracture/a foreign army's structure, motivated with political causes" could simply be war. If it is done outside the context of war, then it's terrorism, but in the context of an actual war, it's simply part of war.
I can assure you that I've designed every one of the lines in that poll so that I could get the information I want to get from those who answer them.(Well, excluding the McDonald's line, I've just ran out of stuff to write)

If I asked it that way, that's the way I intended it to be.
You wanna ask your own questions, make your own poll. :2razz:
 
By the way, in case someone is planning on getting confused with what should have been the obvious, the "Other" does not mean that you have another action to add, since those are simply selected actions and I am well aware that there are countless of other actions that would be perceived as terrorism.
 
I can assure you that I've designed every one of the lines in that poll so that I could get the information I want to get from those who answer them.(Well, excluding the McDonald's line, I've just ran out of stuff to write)

If I asked it that way, that's the way I intended it to be.
You wanna ask your own questions, make your own poll. :2razz:

I did not ask a question(note the lack of question marks in my post), I mentioned an ambiguity which I thought you had put in there by design.
 
I did not ask a question(note the lack of question marks in my post), I mentioned an ambiguity which I thought you had put in there by design.
If I had a teddy bear I'd give it to you as a prize.

Back to the poll now.
 
Another open question, if I may(and I may):

Can a man who is not a member of a terrorist organization commit the act of terrorism?

Or must a person be a member of a terrorist organization in order for the action to be considered terrorism?
 
The first option describes nobody other than a nationalist imo.
 
The first option describes nobody other than a nationalist imo.
Really?

Does that mean that, in your eyes, a person who'd kill another person entirely because of the killed person's nationality must be a nationalist?

Example: An Afghan immigrant to Italy opening fire in a British tea-club, killing 7 civilians out of those 6 British nationals, and he has chosen to target the place because of the residents' nationality, since he desired to kill British nationals.

Can he be something other than a nationalist?
 
An action with the intention of instilling fear/terror in the general populace.

This.

I would add the deliberate targeting of civilians to achieve goals which can be either political or religious.
 
Really?

Does that mean that, in your eyes, a person who'd kill another person entirely because of the killed person's nationality must be a nationalist?

Example: An Afghan immigrant to Italy opening fire in a British tea-club, killing 7 civilians out of those 6 British nationals, and he has chosen to target the place because of the residents' nationality, since he desired to kill British nationals.

Can he be something other than a nationalist?

He'd be a mass murderer, we'd think gone a bit off his head for political reasons.
 
Really?

Does that mean that, in your eyes, a person who'd kill another person entirely because of the killed person's nationality must be a nationalist?

Yes? lol.
Since we are talking in terms of nationality, which doesn't equal race might i add, he cant be a racist.

Example: An Afghan immigrant to Italy opening fire in a British tea-club, killing 7 civilians out of those 6 British nationals, and he has chosen to target the place because of the residents' nationality, since he desired to kill British nationals.

Can he be something other than a nationalist?[/QUOTE]

Sure, but i wouldn't discount it.
He probably aimed at those specific people because there nationality are the same set of people who have gone and invaded his country.
It sounds like the usual response by a pissed nationalist i would say.
 
Last edited:
Terrorism is when you kill innocent people typically a large group of them in order to make a political point/demands. IMO
So you say that terrorism is the killing of innocent, uninvolved civilians for political causes.
 
Yes? lol.


Sure, but i wouldn't discount it.
He probably aimed at those specific people because there nationality are the same set of people who have gone and invaded his country.
It sounds like the usual response by a pissed nationalist i would say.
Can you please mark what differs, in your opinion, between this man from my example and a man who you would consider a terrorist?
 
Can you please mark what differs, in your opinion, between this man from my example and a man who you would consider a terrorist?

Terrorists are nationalists. :shrug:
 
Terrorists are nationalists. :shrug:
According to your opinion, but I'm quite certain that your opinion is not that all of the nationalists are terrorists, if you get my meaning.
 
According to your opinion, but I'm quite certain that your opinion is not that all of the nationalists are terrorists, if you get my meaning.

Yep. But id have to disagree strongly with them. If they aren't nationalists, what are they?
 
Yep. But id have to disagree strongly with them. If they aren't nationalists, what are they?
Is the guy from my example a terrorist?
 
Back
Top Bottom