- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 20,630
- Reaction score
- 14,981
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Thing is, a lot of people want to make this about "being fair" and "treating everyone the same" and "not doing to them what we don't want them doing to us."
Horse $#!+.
The Bill of Rights applies to all American Citizens, period, even if they are accused of terrorism. Or at least it did, until the so-called "Patriot Act".
Foreign nationals who are not in uniform but who engage in acts of sabotage or terrorism against us are not subject to the protections normally afforded POW's, nor are they accused of simple crime, nor are they citizens of the USA. In wartime they can be tried by military tribunal and summarily executed. We are not obligated to extend them any rights at all unless we choose to do so.
I'm not intrested in being fair and equable. I'm intrested in protecting American Citizens. If you're Swedish, I assume your government will act to protect you... that is a government's job, to protect IT'S citizens, not everyone else's.
You have changed my opinion, at first I supported waterboarding for the Amrican terrorists but now I don't becuase they are protected by our constitution.
I agree that the "playing fair" stuff is garbage. Our enemies don't care about us or being "humane." I would think the more humane action would be to waterboard terrorists to save the lives of Americans. It would be inhumane to extend our rights to non citizens who are criminals that intend to kill innocent people. It would be inhumane to not waterboard them and deny ourselves access to information that can save lives, find terrorists, or thwart their plants. And speaking of playing fair, if we give them our rights shouldn't they also pay our taxes too? To "be fair" shouldn't we tax them like citizens if they are going to have protection by the constitution that is for American citizens?