NoJingoLingo
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,320
- Reaction score
- 325
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
This is a true statement but so is this "Many things affect the mind. They CAN affect the mind of people to a level that will cause poor reaction skills in crisis situations when driving. Just because some things can do this doesn't mean that it will happen every time, to every person, every time they go in a car."Marijuana affects the mind. It CAN affect the mind of people to a level that will cause poor reaction skills in crisis situations when driving. Just because it can do this doesn't mean that it will happen every time, to every person, everytime they go in a car.
Therefore, using either of the above arguments against legalization/decrim is specious argumentation.
I never said it wasn't, in fact I clearly stated that in another post that it can be dangerous.However, that doesn't mean its not good advise to tell people "Don't drive when you're high, its dangerous" because its unquestionably more dangerous driving while high then driving while completely sober without any distractions.
Likewise, while not everyone will have issues puking if its needed because of excess alcohol because they're high, it still has the potential for that and as such increases ones risk more so than may be necessary. Thus, similarly, suggesting to people not to get hammered and completely stoned is a reasonable suggestion to make because the potential for harm is increased more so than if you just drank or just got stoned.
You're wrong. It has been stated as fact and that's my beef with his argument.No where has anyone said "If you smoke pot and drive you WILL get in a wreck" nor has anyone said "If you smoke pot and drink alcohol you will NOT be able to throw up".
Then it should be stated as opinion based on ancedotal evidence as a personal warning, instead of stating it as fact. Savvy?They've stated these kind of things have the potential to happen based on the evidence found concerning the situations and as such people suggest not to put yourself into higher risk situations for no particularly good reason.
Now, I don't necessarily disagree with what you're position on giving a warning. The problem is when someone uses anecdotal evidence as fact, from which to make an opposition position.