- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 20,027
- Reaction score
- 7,648
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
Well?
Yes
No
Other
Why or why not?
Yes
No
Other
Why or why not?
Wikipedia has been studied for accurateness and is about as accurate as Encyclopedia Brittanica. However, it never hurts to cross-check it.
Not really.
Wikipedia's description of the history of the Jamestown Colony is an advertisement for the "socialist" nature of the colony, and even perverts John Smith's "he who will not work shall not eat", carefully omitting the statement by Smith that it's wrong for a man to toil to provide food for others when those others refuse to work for themselves.
Depends on the article.
Overall, not really, but it is a good starting point.
Well?
Yes
No
Other
Why or why not?
No way, when I can go on their and change stuff it's not reliable.
You realize that they have a large amount of paid employees who monitor changes to articles, right?No way, when I can go on their and change stuff it's not reliable.
Not to mention all the anal-retentive people with OCD who guard certain articles zealously.You realize that they have a large amount of paid employees who monitor changes to articles, right?