• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who most deserves to get to punch Rush Limbaugh in the mouth?

Who most deserves to punch Rush Limbaugh in the mouth?

  • Jesse Jackson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bill Clinton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Barak Obama

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The CEO of ESPN

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • the black woman whom Rush told "take that bone out of your nose"

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • any black person

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • any Jewish person

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • any decent American

    Votes: 13 76.5%
  • any drug addict

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Donovan McNabb

    Votes: 2 11.8%

  • Total voters
    17
really-so why do so many libs want to ban guns
I don't think they do. Do you have any stats or just your ignorant opinion?

so why do so many libs support death confiscation taxes and high rates of progressive income taxes
Because it's not money your progeny earned (personal responsibility, pulling yourself up by your bootstraps, making it on your own and all the other RW talking points about self reliance), it's money YOU earned by using "the commons", therefore you should give some of it back to "the commons".

As for progressive taxation. You live in a democracy, which is a society. In a society, we must do some things for the common good even when we don't see a direct benefit for ourselves. A flat tax takes more usable and needed money from the poor. If you have $10 and poor joe only has $5 and you both buy a loaf of bread for $3, who has more money left over? That's how a flat tax works. The poor get poorer.

provide a source for your claims or I will continue to assume you are a liar
I asked you first and obviously you're obfuscating. I'll provide my sources right after you do. Deal?
 
why do you support death confiscation taxes

you do realize they deprive me of the right to bequeath what I make how I see fit


Look at who voted for the clinton gun ban-the majority were dems
Again you were asked to provide sources for your facts and again you fail to do so. I think we all knew you were just making **** up.
 
H.R. 1022 [110th]: Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007 (GovTrack.us)

sponsors of the reinstatement of the clinton gun ban

Cosponsors:
Eleanor Norton [D-DC]
Neil Abercrombie [D-HI1]
Gary Ackerman [D-NY5]
Howard Berman [D-CA28]
Earl Blumenauer [D-OR3]
Robert Brady [D-PA1] Lois Capps [D-CA23]
Yvette Clarke [D-NY11]
William Clay [D-MO1]
Joseph Crowley [D-NY7]
Diana DeGette [D-CO1]
William Delahunt [D-MA10

Rahm Emanuel [D-IL5]
Anna Eshoo [D-CA14]
Sam Farr [D-CA17]
Chaka Fattah [D-PA2]
Bob Filner [D-CA51]
Barney Frank [D-MA4] Raul Grijalva [D-AZ7]
Jane Harman [D-CA36]
Alcee Hastings [D-FL23]
Mazie Hirono [D-HI2]
Rush Holt [D-NJ12]
Michael Honda [D-CA15] Sheila Jackson-Lee [D-TX18]
Henry Johnson [D-GA4]
Patrick Kennedy [D-RI1]
Dennis Kucinich [D-OH10]
James Langevin [D-RI2]


all the rest are dems as well

oops

You provided a few democrats. Which ones are the liberals and just so you know, that's not all the liberals in the country so you've got a lot more names to list so you better get busy.

Oh, and that's a particular type of gun, not guns, as in all plural.
 
You provided a few democrats. Which ones are the liberals and just so you know, that's not all the liberals in the country so you've got a lot more names to list so you better get busy.

Oh, and that's a particular type of gun, not guns, as in all plural.


To be precise, the AWB (Assault Weapons Ban) was a ludicrous piece of legislation that purported to ban "military-style assault weapons". It did no such thing. It banned certain weapons with superficial features resembling military weapons. None of these weapons were "machine guns" (not capable of full-auto), they were one-shot-at-a-time semiauto weapons. Nor were there any statistics showing that they were particularly used in crime moreso than other guns.
To make it a further joke, many similar weapons were NOT banned, and weapons manufactured or imported before the ban were grandfathered in, so all it did really was run the price up somewhat.
It was a very bad piece of legislation and I was happy to see it go. I was also very disappointed that Dubya said he would sign an AWB renewal if Congress sent one to him... we have the Repub House to thank that it didn't happen, the Repub Senate did pass a renewal but the House declined.
 
I don't think they do. Do you have any stats or just your ignorant opinion?

Nice insult but it is you who is ignorant and I would be happy to compare resumes with you any time you want


Because it's not money your progeny earned (personal responsibility, pulling yourself up by your bootstraps, making it on your own and all the other RW talking points about self reliance), it's money YOU earned by using "the commons", therefore you should give some of it back to "the commons".

Complete crap-the wealth was already taxed. What did the government do to earn it that is greater than the guy who seeks to leave it to whom he chooses. You libs are hilarious-self reliance is something you ignore when it comes to the welfare recipients and the parasites who vote dems into power


stop expecting other people to pay for your existence. your life does nothing to benefit me, I have no duty to fund it


As for progressive taxation. You live in a democracy, which is a society. In a society, we must do some things for the common good even when we don't see a direct benefit for ourselves. A flat tax takes more usable and needed money from the poor. If you have $10 and poor joe only has $5 and you both buy a loaf of bread for $3, who has more money left over? That's how a flat tax works. The poor get poorer.


I asked you first and obviously you're obfuscating. I'll provide my sources right after you do. Deal

we make it too easy to be poor in this country which is what the dems intended all along-creating millions of people beholden to dem masters. All you and your ilk have done is made America weaker by telling losers it is ok to be a loser
 
You provided a few democrats. Which ones are the liberals and just so you know, that's not all the liberals in the country so you've got a lot more names to list so you better get busy.

Oh, and that's a particular type of gun, not guns, as in all plural.

more dishonesty-every sponsor of that was a dem and there were a b unch more

look at the sponsors-all part of the far left of the dem party.

And many of them-Schumer and Feinstein for example, admitted this ban would just be a first step to more bans

once you have decided banning one type of common gun is going to control crime it doesn't take much for you to advocate banning more guns
 
Who most deserves to get to punch Rush Limbaugh in the mouth?

If Rush Limbaugh deserves a punch in the mouth from those people, then Barack Obama deserves a kick in the nuts from every single red-blooded American...just saying.
 
Back
Top Bottom