Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly's reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)
Thomas Jefferson: "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)
John Adams: "Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self
defense." (A defense of the Constitution of the US)
George Washington: "Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the
people's liberty teeth (and) keystone... the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable... more than
99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes,
we need them every hour." (Address to 1st session of Congress)
George Mason: "To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them." (3 Elliot,
Debates at 380)
Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in
almost every country in Europe." (1787, Pamphlets on the Constitution of the US)
George Washington: "A free people ought to be armed." (Jan 14 1790, Boston Independent
Chronicle.)
Thomas Jefferson: "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (T. Jefferson papers,
334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)
James Madison: "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of
other countries, whose people are afraid to trust them with arms." (Federalist Paper #46)
George Mason: "I ask you sir, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people." (Elliott,
Debates, 425-426)
Richard Henry Lee: "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and
include all men capable of bearing arms." (Additional letters from the Federal Farmer, at 169, 1788)
James Madison: "A well regulated militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the
best and most natural defense of a free country." (1st Annals of Congress, at 434, June 8th 1789,
emphasis added.
Patrick Henry: "The people have a right to keep and bear arms." (Elliott, Debates at 185)
Alexander Hamilton: "...that standing army can never be formidable (threatening) to the liberties
of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in the use of arms."
(Federalist Paper #29)
"Little more can be aimed at with respect to the people at large than to have them properly armed
and equipped." (Id) {responding to the claim that the militia itself could threaten liberty}" There is
something so far-fetched, and so extravagant in the idea of danger of liberty from the militia that one
is at a loss whether to treat it with gravity or raillery (mockery). (Id)
On what is the militia:
I am surprised that someone voted that it should be legal to own an atomic bomb. Or maybe I'm not surprised.
I'm on the fence regarding AK-47s and M-16s. They really have no legitimate use and they're often used in gang crimes...
Every man is a responsible gun owner till they shoot their wife.
handguns are used more often in crime, including gang crime, than rifles or automatics.
Ya but that's because there are a lot more handguns than automatics, and because handguns are more appropriate for the average murder. Automatics are a better choice for a very specific KIND of murder.
Nope, handguns are better as they can be concealed more easily and for the crimes you're talking about are more accurate. I mean, if we're talking about choice for specific gang activities, it should be a damned good rifle. Mount up some ambush or station people on roofs with a good ol' rifle and pick people off below. It'd be a hell of a lot more devastating and effective that holding down the trigger to a spray and pray gun.
I voted none.
It's impossible to answer as I believe that all of the above should be regulated in some way.
any guns and weapons that are used by SWAT or police forces... that is basically all the terror groups use and look at how difficult it has been for our forces to defeat them in the ME.
Is this an argument IN FAVOR of allowing their ownership?
yes it is... sorry if I worded it strangely...
All weapons should be banned. I live in Australia and gun ownership is illegal here, in doing so we have far less crime per capita then the United States. I'm not trying to offend Americans here (i'm quite fond of Yanks) but I completely diagree with some of the constitution you have in place.