• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should the US ReCalim the Moon

Should the US Reclaim the moon?


  • Total voters
    21

Scarecrow Akhbar

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,430
Reaction score
2,282
Location
Los Angeles
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Obama aims to ax moon mission
NASA's plans to return astronauts to the moon are dead. So are the rockets being designed to take them there — that is, if President Barack Obama gets his way.

When the White House releases his budget proposal Monday, there will be no money for the Constellation program that was supposed to return humans to the moon by 2020. The troubled and expensive Ares I rocket that was to replace the space shuttle to ferry humans to space will be gone, along with money for its bigger brother, the Ares V cargo rocket that was to launch the fuel and supplies needed to take humans back to the moon.

There will be no lunar landers, no moon bases, no Constellation program at all.

In their place, according to White House insiders, agency officials, industry executives and congressional sources familiar with Obama's long-awaited plans for the space agency, NASA will look at developing a new "heavy-lift" rocket that one day will take humans and robots to explore beyond low Earth orbit. But that day will be years — possibly even a decade or more — away.

In the meantime, the White House will direct NASA to concentrate on Earth-science projects — principally, researching and monitoring climate change — and on a new technology research and development program that will one day make human exploration of asteroids and the inner solar system possible.

There will also be funding for private companies to develop capsules and rockets that can be used as space taxis to take astronauts on fixed-price contracts to and from the International Space Station — a major change in the way the agency has done business for the past 50 years.

The White House budget request, which is certain to meet fierce resistance in Congress, scraps the Bush administration's Vision for Space Exploration and signals a major reorientation of NASA, especially in the area of human spaceflight.

"We certainly don't need to go back to the moon," said one administration official.

Everyone interviewed for this article spoke on condition of anonymity, either because they are not authorized to talk for the White House or because they fear for their jobs. All are familiar with the broad sweep of Obama's budget proposal, but none would talk about specific numbers because these are being tightly held by the White House until the release of the budget.

Well, should the US tolerate this idiot's lead and abandon the most important military and economic asset to the Chinese or anyone?
 
Oh, crap.

Forgot the poll.

Could a moderator please put up a "Yes/No" poll?

Thanks.

Answer: No, of course we shouldn't abandon space to our future enemies.
 
When was the moon calimed the first time?

Ok being serious. Is there an economic benefit to having a moon base?
 
Last edited:
No. We have other problems right now. The moon is still going to be there in 20 or 30 years.
 
No. We have other problems right now. The moon is still going to be there in 20 or 30 years.

Like AI and my flying car?!?!
 
WTF is so important about the moon? Other than the regulation of our tides? there's no reason to spend the money necessary to get there and there is zero military significance to the moon, and no one country can own the moon.
 
I don't think the plans should be scraped. It is a jumping off point to other space exploration projects.

Space construction, better orbital platforms and a more useful shuttle would all benefit from the program. In the long run this will hurt us.

I think Obama is really stupid to dump it.
 
This is why I hate politicians they are always ruining the best things imaginable.
 
I don't think the plans should be scraped. It is a jumping off point to other space exploration projects.

Space construction, better orbital platforms and a more useful shuttle would all benefit from the program. In the long run this will hurt us.

I think Obama is really stupid to dump it.

I can't blame him though. People are already freaking out about minor issues simply because he is a democrat.
 
I don't think the plans should be scraped. It is a jumping off point to other space exploration projects.

Space construction, better orbital platforms and a more useful shuttle would all benefit from the program. In the long run this will hurt us.

I think Obama is really stupid to dump it.

In the 1960's, the space program created many things of value. I especially liked "Tang". :mrgreen:
 
We have a ton of work to do here.
This silly moon business, I believe, is escapism for the dreamers.
Again, Mr Obama is doing the right thing.
A huge area is education, so many cannot read and write.
But, here, our federal government should keeps their hands off.
If some states wish to be stupid and uneducated, so be it.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the plans should be scraped. It is a jumping off point to other space exploration projects.

Space construction, better orbital platforms and a more useful shuttle would all benefit from the program. In the long run this will hurt us.

I think Obama is really stupid to dump it.

Tell you what. Let's first fix New Orleans and other problems we have terrestrially. Then we'll entertain notions of fantasy space travel.
 
I can't blame him though. People are already freaking out about minor issues simply because he is a democrat.

I can blame him. Do you understand the amount of research and money that has already gone through to develop these advances of science? And what were they done for? So that we can have a prescence in space and to show that from that day on we as a society were moving ahead of everyone. If he cancels the project we have gone several steps back and we are going to show the world that we really are not a power anymore because what made us powerful were our advances in technology.
 
Tell you what. Let's first fix New Orleans and other problems we have terrestrially. Then we'll entertain notions of fantasy space travel.

That would be like telling Chris Columbus to wait until Spain fixed all of its problems before setting sail.
 
Tell you what. Let's first fix New Orleans and other problems we have terrestrially. Then we'll entertain notions of fantasy space travel.

We can't fix all the things terrestrially, its like telling a killer to quit killing. Won't happen. I think you are living in a fantasy that you belive you can fix all the problems we have.
 
That would be like telling Chris Columbus to wait until Spain fixed all of its problems before setting sail.

Except that we're not talking about commissioning a few ships and sailors to go on a trip with well known technology. We're talking about fantasy space travel which would take several decades just to research and develop not to mention all the other problems and training which would come along with it. The price tag would be huge. In the meantime, we'd have to divert funds to go into the research and engineering feats necessary for space travel at the cost of tons of other research which could have been done on Earth and which could have produced much more useful results to us first.

But yeah, other than that, it's totally the same. :roll:
 
Except that we're not talking about commissioning a few ships and sailors to go on a trip with well known technology. We're talking about fantasy space travel which would take several decades just to research and develop not to mention all the other problems and training which would come along with it. The price tag would be huge. In the meantime, we'd have to divert funds to go into the research and engineering feats necessary for space travel at the cost of tons of other research which could have been done on Earth and which could have produced much more useful results to us first.

But yeah, other than that, it's totally the same. :roll:

I guess you don't understand but there has already been much progress made. :roll:

I guess it can be compared to christopher columbus sailing and finding the new world but instead of landing with boots on the ground he just decides to turn around and leave with that.
 
We can't fix all the things terrestrially, its like telling a killer to quit killing. Won't happen. I think you are living in a fantasy that you belive you can fix all the problems we have.

Pretty sure I didn't say all problems. But we have a large standing number of problems which need to be researched and solved before we starting thinking of Han Solo and flying the Millennium Falcon to Mars.
 
Pretty sure I didn't say all problems. But we have a large standing number of problems which need to be researched and solved before we starting thinking of Han Solo and flying the Millennium Falcon to Mars.

Pretty sure you don't understand that it isn't about being like Han Solo. Its just about moving ahead.
 
Pretty sure I didn't say all problems. But we have a large standing number of problems which need to be researched and solved before we starting thinking of Han Solo and flying the Millennium Falcon to Mars.

And we always will. There has been no point in the history of this country where things were going peachy. We might as well, the sooner we do it, the sooner we will find a payoff.
 
That would be like telling Chris Columbus to wait until Spain fixed all of its problems before setting sail.
Columbus was centuries behind the Norse/Vikings, who were behind the Chinese.
Columbus and the Europeans only bought woe upon America.

Our skills and technologies should be applied to our problems, not the moon...
 
I guess it can be compared to christopher columbus sailing and finding the new world but instead of landing with boots on the ground he just decides to turn around and leave with that.

Still not comparable as you're still dealing with terrestrial concerns. While ships and men were fairly expensive, it wave completely possible to finance such an expedition by a singular country. That is not the case for space research. Apples and oranges.
 
And we always will. There has been no point in the history of this country where things were going peachy. We might as well, the sooner we do it, the sooner we will find a payoff.

I'm all for progress. However, there are far greater things to research currently on earth that will have far greater and more immediate impact that space travel. I don't think you people quite understand the price tag which would come with this if we were to seriously pursue space travel. There's not a "payoff" to space travel at this point. And any potential "payoff" there may be is offset by the initialization costs and times and diverting of funds away from other research which is more immediately practical.
 
When was the moon calimed the first time?

Ok being serious. Is there an economic benefit to having a moon base?

There's always economic benefit to claiming real estate before the other nations get it.

And....the moon is essential to the future exploration and hence exploitation of the solar system. Otherwise, all assets have to be hauled up from Earth, expensively.
 
Last edited:
Tell you what. Let's first fix New Orleans and other problems we have terrestrially. Then we'll entertain notions of fantasy space travel.

Where do you come off with this fantasy crap? We already have the technology, we are in th process of perfecting it. The loss of this program will leave us years behind in technology.

You can call it fantasy all you like, that does not make it so.
 
Back
Top Bottom