• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is it time to profile on airline flights?

Is it time to profile on airline flights?

  • Total voters
    82
Skateguy said:
I have never actually seen a Flag burner. --and hope I never do.
Click to expand...

Happened all the time during the Viet nam war........even spitting on the returning troops by our left wing friends........
 
Navy Pride said:
same thing
Click to expand...

Yeah. And you're a Nazi. Same thing right? No Navy Pride. They are not the same thing. Anarchists are not always or even the majority of time leftists. About half are closer to libertarians(right wingers) than they are to any leftist I know.
 
Last edited:
Hatuey said:
Yeah. And you're a Nazi. Same thing right? No Navy Pride. Anarchists are not leftists. About half are closer to libertarians(right wingers) than they are to any leftist I know.
Click to expand...

well when you see people like Jane Fonda there you know what they are..........
 
Navy Pride said:
Happened all the time during the Viet nam war........even spitting on the returning troops by our left wing friends........
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say "All the time"....and those who spit on the returning troops should be ashamed of themselves. We should show respect for those who served whether we agree with the mission or not.

That said, Navy....you also disrespect all of the troops when you disrespect and degrade the service of those you disagree with.

Supporting the troops and showing respect for the military means showing respect for all....not just those you choose to respect.
 
Navy Pride said:
well when you see people like Jane Fonda there you know what they are..........
Click to expand...

WHERE IN THAT ENTIRE VIDEO IS JANE FONDA? PLEASE? SHOW ME! Oh you can't? WHAT DOES JANE FONDA HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? DID SHE MAKE A GOOD MOVIE OR SOMETHING?
 
Navy Pride said:
Happened all the time during the Viet nam war........even spitting on the returning troops by our left wing friends........
Click to expand...
I'm 63, and never saw any of that. and I was out in the streets. we don't want to paint with to wide a brush.
 
Zyphlin said:
Yay! You can take a singular line out of an entire post and post it completely out of context to try and make a point and fail miserably. Good job Sgt Rock! Now post it in context and watch as I have a good laugh at your failure of an attempt of ignoring and back peddling from your own blatant bigotted statements by trying to put forth something I did as a parody of another person specifically as an example to make a point.

:roll:

For the love of god, step up your game, cause that's just a pathetic effort on your part.



Haha, false lefties. Lets see here.

Who wants to impose legislation that will cause greater Federal Spending? - Navy Pride. How conservative of you.

Who wants to impose legislation that would violate the constitution of this country? - Navy Pride. How conservative of you.

Who wants to impose legislation that would inject more big government into private citizens lives? - Navy Pride. How conservative of you.

Who wants to give the federal government more powers and more authority? - Navy Pride. How conservative of you.

Who wants to pass legislation that will cause more government workers to be hired thus further growing government? - Navy Pride. How conservative of you.

Yes Navy, you definitely are the stalwart indicator of what is or isn't conservative. Big spending, Big government, Big Nanny. How wonderfully conservative. Its pathetic you ever try to call someone else something other than a conservative, which you do continually, when you yourself are far from a true conservative as well. To you "conservative" means anyone that doesn't agree 100% with your world view. You want to label anyone a leftie this or leftwing that when you can't look in the damn mirror to see you're one of the biggest pro-government spending, pro-government expansion, pro-government involvement leftist on this forum Navy.

You can hold onto your delusional, irrational, bigoted, hatefilled world view and view point that anyone that doesn't think like you is somehow meant to be belittled, insulted, or labeled because frankly, there's not a person here who gives a damn who you think is a leftist or not because its a pathetic and hilllarious thing to watch YOU, Mr Big Government, try to tell anyone whether they're a conservative or not.

No, unlike you, I care about our constitution. I care about the freedoms we have. I care about keeping us safe through the use of useful, workable measures that also don't destroy the very thing we're supposed to be protecting. So continue you're pointless bellowing about how we're letting the terrorists when because we don't let people push racist views, and make no mistake everytime you say Hussein when you call no one else by their middle name it makes it perfectly clear what kind of views you hold, because it just shows what kind of a joke your political views are. People like you trying to call me liberal is far, far from something that is going to cause me to shift and share your racist beliefs. Trust me on that.
Click to expand...

Parody or not use of such racist language is against forum rules. You of all people should know this.
 
Navy Pride said:
Here you might learn something about your left wing friends
Click to expand...

I never said there weren't assholes. I said I have not seen anyone disrespect America or the whole of our troops in this thread. And that remains true. Sure, there are some people out there that do as you claim. It's not the whole, it's a sub-section. They're assholes, nothing you can do about them.
 
RightinNYC said:
And so far AQ has shown a tendency to avoid attacking soft, high-profile targets in favor of hard, low-profile ones. Right.
Click to expand...

Yeah...

Too bad that West Point has already done the research that shows AQ has targeted Muslims circa 90% of the time, over international targets.
al-Qa'ida is not a threat to the security of the nation anymore than >insert Radical Ideologue here<
 
This is an interesting thread, but I'm still trying to figure out how a navy guy doesn't recall Pearl Harbor. :confused:

Care to respond to the questions you've ignored, NP?
 
To suggest we are more at danger today than WWII is absurd.
 
Zyphlin said:
And if we had a big attack people like you would be the first to go in the street celebrating it and going "WHOOPIE, This showed that damn muslim nigger Hussien Obama failed, WOOO".
Click to expand...

So, anyone that disagrees with PBO must be a racist. Is that it?
 
apdst said:
How many times was the mainland United States attacked during WW2? Once? Twice?
Click to expand...

Follow the links, chumley. :2wave:
 
Glinda said:
Follow the links, chumley. :2wave:
Click to expand...

I didn't think you knew the answer to the question, so there was no need to announce to the forum that you have no clue what I'm talking about.
 
apdst said:
So, anyone that disagrees with PBO must be a racist. Is that it?
Click to expand...

Not at all, which was my point.

Ignorantly assuming people against racual profiling would instantly be screaming that we didn't do enough to stop an attack after it happens, with no further proof that the oerson would do that beyond your own ignorant assumption is as stupid as makinh a blanket statement that anyone against obamas policies would instantly use an incident in a racist matter to attack the president.

I was illustrating the stunning ignorance of navys point by providing him with a counter example
 
Zyphlin said:
Not at all, which was my point.

Ignorantly assuming people against racual profiling would instantly be screaming that we didn't do enough to stop an attack after it happens, with no further proof that the oerson would do that beyond your own ignorant assumption is as stupid as makinh a blanket statement that anyone against obamas policies would instantly use an incident in a racist matter to attack the president.

I was illustrating the stunning ignorance of navys point by providing him with a counter example
Click to expand...

We have to recognize a threat and neutralize that threat. Going after white europeans, especially white, European females is a complete waste of time.

Sorry, but that's reality. But, don't take my word for it. Wait until the non-profile method fails, again, only this ime a hundred, or a thousand people die. Then you'll see for yourself. Too bad that's what it's going to take to convince you.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Enough of the pet names used to bait. Let's actually debate rather than accuse each other of not understanding what you are talking about.
 
We should profile anyone attempting to fly as homicidal toward the planet, and ultimately the genocide of humanity.
 
Arch Enemy said:
How many al-Qa'ida submarines are off the coast of New York?
Click to expand...

That don't even make any sense, dude.

You do realize that German subs never attacked the mainland United States?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom