- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 112,910
- Reaction score
- 60,369
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I believe what he's saying is that an irate parent, especially just ONE irate parent, who's mad over going to HOOTERS, should not be enough to SUSPEND a teacher.
A parent did not suspend a teacher, the school did. The parents of at least one kid complained that the teacher took their kid to Hooters without permission, which is a legitimate complaint. The school, based on the complaint and the nature of things(does taking kids somewhere without parental permission violate school rules? Does this teacher have a history of poor decision making? Who knows, but the school certainly has more details than us) made the decision to suspend the teacher.