- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
- Messages
- 8,211
- Reaction score
- 4,179
- Location
- Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I understand your point perfectly, actually. What you are doing is trying to have me answer irrelevant questions that you think will help prove your point.
IF I remember correctly, you either stated or indicated that I was one of these people, "who think the "family unit" is an arbitrary social construct that perpetuates patriarchal authoritarianism". In fact, I think that you stated it directly....
Also, I am against coaches taking students to Hooters which should not be classified as a "family restaurant" and I am Conservative... there goes your stereotype I guess.
Can't fit everything into a nice little box...
The fact that waitresses dress "sexy" is TOTALLY RELEVANT and Hooters IS NOT a mainstream restaurant and I'm not certain that it should be OK to take kids there either... the fact that they dress sexy is the entire point, one that you completely fail to acknowldge, instead opting to lrepeat that it is legal and anybody that disagrees should give up since they have no point when it is exactly the opposite...
You keep saying family restaurant now right after yousaid that you didn't buy into those who think the "family unit" is an arbitrary social construct that perpetuates patriarchal authoritarianism and that a family restaurant is offensive... Do you have dual personalities? :2razz:
Keep saying I am a fringe leftist all you like, you might even actually believe it too! Also, it is Conservatives that would dislike women dressing trashy and liberals that are for it, Conservatives that are for keeping children within the bounds of morality and Liberals that are for stretching morals to the breaking point, so I think that you have the political spectrum backwards...
Bodhi, I think you're very confused right now. I haven't made ANY comments about your personal beliefs, at all. Until we get this straight, this conversation cannot progress.