• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does life on other planets disprove the BIble

See OP

  • Total voters
    67
Goobieman said:
Laugh all you want -- you still havent supported your claim, and as such your claim remains meaningless.
Click to expand...

I'm not required to, by the rule you introduced.

You'll just have to take it on faith that I'm right.
 
No, because the bible is fake from the get-go.
 
paris said:
No, because the bible is fake from the get-go.
Click to expand...

There was no King Solomon? No Babylon or other Cities/Nations? And absolutely all the information in it has never been historically verified? Hmmmmm...You may not believe in Cosmic Jewish Zombies who forgive your sins, but there are historically accurate bits of information in the Bible.
 
Last edited:
Scarecrow Akhbar said:
I'm not required to, by the rule you introduced.
Click to expand...
Like I said -- you still havent supported your claim, and as such your claim remains meaningless. If thats how you want to leave things, I really do not care.
 
Goobieman said:
Wow!
Show this to be true.
Click to expand...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJHJMJqiiTY"]YouTube- Why the Bible is Fake - Ep1 Jesus p1[/ame]

:lol:
 
Last edited:
Goobieman said:
Like I said -- you still havent supported your claim, and as such your claim remains meaningless. If thats how you want to leave things, I really do not care.
Click to expand...

Yeah, whatever.

Re-read your rule and get back to us.
 
Scarecrow Akhbar said:
Yeah, whatever.
Re-read your rule and get back to us.
Click to expand...
Like I said -- you still havent supported your claim, and as such your claim remains meaningless. If thats how you want to leave things, I really do not care.
 
Goobieman said:
Like I said -- you still havent supported your claim, and as such your claim remains meaningless. If thats how you want to leave things, I really do not care.
Click to expand...


In other words, your rules don't apply when you want an answer.

Typical Christian.
 
Scarecrow Akhbar said:
In other words, your rules don't apply when you want an answer.

Typical Christian.
Click to expand...

Paris said the Bible is fake from the get go, ie in it's entirety.

Even such a scholar as yourself will not let this blatant blanketing go unchallenged??

There are plenty of things in the Bible that are historically accurate. The only part people really take issue with is, as I mentioned, Cosmic Jewish Zombie
 
EpicDude86 said:
There are plenty of things in the Bible that are historically accurate. The only part people really take issue with is, as I mentioned, Cosmic Jewish Zombie
Click to expand...

And the creation myth.
And the exodus myth.
And the talk of giants and unicorns and leviathons and angels and demonic possession and slaying armies with jawbones and talking flaming bushes and virgin births and sexism and justification of slavery and the followers who claim it is inerrant when there are glaring contradictions throughout.

Don't forget those. :D
 
factorial said:
And the creation myth.
And the exodus myth.
And the talk of giants and unicorns and leviathons and angels and demonic possession and slaying armies with jawbones and talking flaming bushes and virgin births and sexism and justification of slavery and the followers who claim it is inerrant when there are glaring contradictions throughout.

Don't forget those. :D
Click to expand...

But those are the best parts!
 
factorial said:
And the creation myth.
And the exodus myth.
And the talk of giants and unicorns and leviathons and angels and demonic possession and slaying armies with jawbones and talking flaming bushes and virgin births and sexism and justification of slavery and the followers who claim it is inerrant when there are glaring contradictions throughout.

Don't forget those. :D
Click to expand...

My point was Paris suggested it was entirely fake. When you blanket term stuff you lose a little credibility. Everyone is guilty of this.
 
EpicDude86 said:
My point was Paris suggested it was entirely fake. When you blanket term stuff you lose a little credibility. Everyone is guilty of this.
Click to expand...

2367515373_515ff7a325.jpg
 
:)
EpicDude86 said:
My point was Paris suggested it was entirely fake. When you blanket term stuff you lose a little credibility. Everyone is guilty of this.
Click to expand...

When I say the bible is fake from the get-go, I mean it is bogus from the very start, no matter if aliens exist or not.

Also I have no need for a little credibility as I have no credo at all:)
 
Just a little commentary. What I find interesting about this thread is that neither Goobieman nor Scarecrow are answering the other's questions; both are becoming frustrated with this refusal to do so. Now you both know what it is like for the rest of us when we debate each of you.

Back to our regularly scheduled programing.
 
paris said:
:)

When I say the bible is fake from the get-go, I mean it is bogus from the very start, no matter if aliens exist or not.

Also I have no need for a little credibility as I have no credo at all:)
Click to expand...

And when I say you're incorrect, I mean you're lumping the historical accuracies in the Bible in with the Fairy Tales. Will you discount any other book if it was a mix of Fiction and Historical fact? I hope you wouldn't, I'd hope you would discern for yourself what is fake and what is real and not just go, This book has fairy tales in it. It is all false.
 
How can something that is not proven, established or have any geological/cosmoslogical/historical value be disproven?

Thats like asking if a discovery would unseat the stork theory of child-birth.
 
Lachean said:
How can something that is not proven, established or have any geological/cosmoslogical/historical value be disproven?

Thats like asking if a discovery would unseat the stork theory of child-birth.
Click to expand...

Parts of the Bible have been proven to be historically accurate. They did a History channel special on it and I'm sure there's a book that discusses these historically accurate pieces and how they shouldn't be labeled invalid because they are mixed with fiction.
 
EpicDude86 said:
And when I say you're incorrect, I mean you're lumping the historical accuracies in the Bible in with the Fairy Tales. Will you discount any other book if it was a mix of Fiction and Historical fact? I hope you wouldn't, I'd hope you would discern for yourself what is fake and what is real and not just go, This book has fairy tales in it. It is all false.
Click to expand...

Mixing historical facts and fiction is a very well-known literary process used by many authors to add realism to their fictional work. The bible is a work of fiction, to me it's just a book, and a very boring one to read at that. Sorry.
 
Is the Bible Historically Accurate?

Could all of this been fabricated by Biblical writers? The evidence from archaeology says NO! As quoted in the New York Times, Dr. Nelson Gluech said, "No archaeological discovery has ever been made that contradicts or controverts historical statements in Scripture." (Book Review, Oct. 18, 1956). Henry M. Morris observes: "...there exists today not one unquestionable find of archaeology that proves the bible to be in error at any point." (The Bible and Modern Science, p. 95). Every day archeologist and historians are uncovering more and more evidence that the Bible is historically accurate.
If the Bible is so accurate historically how much more is it in guiding man spiritually.
Click to expand...


Here's a paper that lists examples of Biblical-Historical accuracies. Double check them if you'd like, I think there's at Christian bias to the article, but still he offers facts. We shall see.
 
paris said:
Mixing historical facts and fiction is a very well-known literary process used by many authors to add realism to their fictional work. The bible is a work of fiction, to me it's just a book, and a very boring one to read at that. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Well there we go, see. The truth will set you free ;) It's just a boring book, not "False from the get go"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom