Really, I really truly honestly did. All you had to do was read the posts.
Assumptions do not have corollaries, conclusions do.
But since your assumptions were invalid and could not sustain a logcially consistent argument, your conclusions were wrong, as I most throughly demonstrated. Any "corollaries" drawn from false conclusions are false.
Translated into english, this statement means "I can't refute your logic that demolishes what I said, so I'm going to say 'you're wrong, I'm right, it doesn't matter what the logic is' ".
Yes, you're still wrong until you actually refute the proof refuting you.
Since you've claimed the assumptions I used were wrong, and those assumptions were your assumptions, you've already conceded.
No, I didn't use your arguments.
I refuted them.
Your religious convictions that natural rights somehow and inexplicably exist are refuted by your own statements.