Badfish420
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 411
- Reaction score
- 77
- Location
- MA, USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Poor and equal.
yea but equal nevertheless
Poor and equal.
I prefer equal chance over equal poorness.yea but equal nevertheless
fascism isnt usually capitalist though.I prefer equal chance over equal poorness.
Hence, I would take Capitalism over Communism any day.
fascism isnt usually capitalist though.
Yes, however, Facists often directed how people were to use their "private" property and had much more control over the economy than a non toltatlitarian country.
Private property in the industry of the Third Reich is often considered a mere nominal provision without much substance. However, that is not correct, because firms, despite the rationing and licensing activities of the state, still had ample scope to devise their own production and investment profiles. Even regarding war-related projects, freedom of contract was generally respected; instead of using power, the state offered firms a number of contract options to choose from. There were several motives behind this attitude of the regime, among them the conviction that private property provided important incentives for increasing efficiency.
I said that they allowed limited Autonomy.
Fascist or Communist?
The government had huge involvement in the economy as shown by his Great Resynchronization. I never said that there was no private market.
No one claimed you did. What you did imply was that the private market that existed was largely directed by state forces, which is incorrect. The regulatory structure and management that was in place existed alongside the private ownership of the means of production, rendering Nazi Germany a capitalist country not greatly distinct from existing capitalist economies today.
I've stated Hitler's reletive moderation several times.
Who were the "good guys" in Enemy at the Gates? The Stalinists or the Nazis?
I liked.The bullets.