What do you define as reasonable restrictions to the second amendment? This is mostly aimed at the 35 plus people who voted in this
thread. Everybody has their own interpretation of what exactly is "reasonable".
Permits/licenses for firearms/weapons
Fire arms/weapons registrations
Waiting Periods.
Laws governing how firearms are to be stored.
Firearms/weapon class requirement.
Convicted felons and certified crazy people permanently banned from firearms/weapon ownership.(please specify)
Convicted felons and certified crazy people temporarily banned from firearms/weapon ownership.(please specify)
Age minimum requirement to buy firearms/weapons(please specify)
Firearm magazine size restrictions(please specify)
ban on certain firearms/weapons (please specify)
other(please specify)
It is my belief that you do not need permission from the government in order to exercise a right. It is also my belief that our founding forefathers created the second amendment as a means for individuals to protect themselves and loved ones, to to protect this country if it was ever invaded, and to over throw the government if it became too tyrannical/ corrupt. So the government therefore has no business restricting any firearms or which law abiding citizens can own firearms.