The theosophists are interesting and make some good arguments but I prefer the Perennialists/traditionalists. Sometimes the theosophists can have an ecumenicalism that is a little soft and come close to being their own religion and I find them sometimes too antagonistic to traditional religion.
Well the perennialists would say these were similar often.
Yeah the theosophists have some very good arguments but some less so. I prefer the perennialists but the theosophists certainly have somethings to offer like the nature of the absolute and such.
Suuuuure you have. :roll:
You should talk to more religious leaders. Go talk to a Buddhist monk; if he tells you not to ask questions, he's not a Buddhist.
Actually no.
I simply gave you the real numbers.
'We all' is a generalization.
What makes you think so?
You can't tell that by looking at the numbers and the odds.
I never said it was accurate, I merely corrected you about the 'cheating' part, as a guest voting in a poll is really not cheating.
It has everything to do with what you said.
My claim was that you cannot tell whether somebody has cheated or whether it's a mere forum-guest voting in a poll by looking at the numbers of votes and the numbers of the shown users.
What is it that I've missed which makes you so certain that someone has been cheating in the poll?
