- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
How many people can recognize logical fallacies on this board?
That's called a Red Herring
How many people can recognize logical fallacies on this board?
Each time? How many did you have? I know thats a personal question but since your throwing it out there.
I don't see a problem with having a 24 hour waiting period before an abortion.
Ok so we're talking about an irresponsible dip**** who thought it would be an outstanding idea to ask for a woman's hand in marriage, and then steeped in ignorance they both mutually agreed that bringing children into poverty was the best thing the world needed. Willfully forsaking the benefit of a father's advice and a childhood full of on-the-job training, our model leader finds himself unable to feed himself, his wife, his children, or fulfill the most basic civil duties.
Yeah, I have no problem locking him in the stockade for a few days. No problem at all.
Rifles were cheap because you didn't have new and you didn't have to have the latest model. You could have an old hand-me-down in good repair, but this icon of civic virtue couldn't even muster a rusty antique and a few shots.
That's called a Red Herring
2 abortions, 1 miscarriage, 2 adoptions, and 2 we kept.
Not in that order.
Long story.
As was his statement. Good job. Now be fair or don't post. :roll:
Thanks. On a side note we have adopted twice as well. When you think about it, it is something else that it takes over a year to adopt a child and give him or her a family, but some people have a problem with making someone think it over for 24 hours before they get an abortion.
I'll post whatever the **** I want. Don't like it? Don't read it.
It's like those fast-food costumers I'm becoming acquainted with who have to wait an additional 30 seconds for their food for some random stupid reason. OMG people it's 30 seconds, you took way longer than that making up your order. Calm the **** down.
OMFG!! You just compared waiting for an abortion with waiting for fast food!!
My wife had two miscarriages and two live births. We did not voluntarily or purposely kill any of our babies.
My, but you are a twitchy little fella! :rofl
Look, you either approve of the gov't telling citizens what to buy and what to do, or you're not. Which is it? It can't be one way when you want it in one circumstance and one way when you don't. That's called "the divine right of kings," and you'd have to have your own private serfdom to make it work. Critical thinkers in a free country can't pull that **** -- at least not with any sense of self-respect.
Ah, so you're for the gov't telling people what to purchase with their own money, when it's in moderation. Tell me, who gets to decide what "in moderation" is? The gov't? You? Who?
Asking you to what effect your argument actually had isnt a logical fallacy.How many people can recognize logical fallacies on this board?
Thats what happens to people that break the law.LOL!! You can't afford a gun, so we're going to put you up in jail and pay for your food and shelter there.
And to think you spoke of logical fallacies.Sounds like the Taliban to me. Yep.
On the contrary -- I am arguing that the practice then was as accepted as the practice today.Yes, this was my point. Do you think the gov't should tell you that you have to provide health care for the old and the poor, or not? If you say no, then you can't be in favor of "such silliness" as the gov't expecting compliance on telling people to own guns. You both argue for and against a system of doing things depending on whether you happen to agree with the particular topic at that particular time.
Wow you really have no clue how a democratic republic works?
Jesus Christ you pro-choicers are so ****ing ignorant.
When you pull your first trigger!When does life begin?
Asking you to what effect your argument actually had isnt a logical fallacy.
Can't answer the question, eh?
Excuse me, but are you really claiming that ALL pro-choicers are "so ****ing ignorant"? Seriously? That sounds a lot like someone saying, "All pro-lifers are so ****ing ignorant," or "All blacks....," or "All Europeans..." Or is this just another case of you being able to say it for your stance, but nobody else having that same right?
Thats what happens to people that break the law.
Not sure why you think your argument here has any teeth.
And to think you spoke of logical fallacies.
This one is a 'non-sequitur'.
On the contrary -- I am arguing that the practice then was as accepted as the practice today.
I'll accept this as your admission that the picture you painted never went to print, therefore nullifying the argument you were trying to make.I raised a hypothetical. For you to then want actual facts and figures as if i was quoting something that occurred is a fallacy. If you don't see that, then fine, and when i do it to you, i expect you to answer it as if it's perfectly logical. Somehow i think you'd not want that.
Ok, flopsy. Whatever you say, flopsy.FAIL I was addressing your red herring, jack, in order to try to get you to stay on track from now on, jack.
Nop, I can't answer the question, you got me. This thread is about abortion, not to provide you with a high school education. You got me :roll: