LiveUninhibited
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2009
- Messages
- 548
- Reaction score
- 140
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
My belief is that homosexuality is not natural.
I also believe that voting for gay marriage would counter my belief by legitimizing homosexuality as natural in the law.
I do not appeal to the meaning of natural, but to my theory that it isn't natural, and to the fact that I would counter my own theory by voting for gay marriage.
Why is it so hard to understand?
Perhaps you should be questioning your own belief, before claiming that other people's beliefs are foolish, and only make yourself appear as a fool in the process.
Look, if you are using the idea that homosexuality is not natural in order to decide to vote against gay rights, then you are appealing to nature and that is fallacious reasoning. There is no way around that.
I could believe that X activity is unnatural, but since I know that whether something is natural or not is irrelevant, it would not affect my decision in voting.