• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you vote to legal same gender marriages?

Would you vote to legalize same gender marriages?

  • Yes, I would vote to make gay marriage legal

    Votes: 79 69.9%

  • No, I would vote against making gay marriage legal

    Votes: 28 24.8%

  • I am undecided and wouldn't vote

    Votes: 6 5.3%
  • Total voters
    113
Apocalypse said:
Your analogies are way off the line.
By unnatural I've meant that homosexuality prevents the couple from reproducing their genes and creating new lives.
It is bad not simply because it is unnatural, but because it damages the circularity of life.
Click to expand...

So do condoms and the birth control pill. Would you vote to ban them? What's more unnatural than deliberately refusing nature's right to take its course? ;)
 
LiveUninhibited said:
The circularity of life? I think human civilization abolished that a long time ago. So then you feel it is wrong or unnatural for infertile people to get married? They won't be reproducing.
Click to expand...
Third line in this post.
Don't make me return on stances I already took.
 
Last edited:
I would vote for it. And put a post script at the bottom

"Careful what you wish for"

:2razz:
 
Arcana XV said:
So do condoms and the birth control pill. Would you vote to ban them? What's more unnatural than deliberately refusing nature's right to take its course? ;)
Click to expand...

Does this mean we can't give her a "pearl necklace" either? :(
 
Arcana XV said:
So do condoms and the birth control pill. Would you vote to ban them? What's more unnatural than deliberately refusing nature's right to take its course? ;)
Click to expand...
Or in other words, you completely misunderstood my position on this issue.
I am not saying everyone should reproduce immediately or they'll be shot, I'm saying that homosexuality prevents the option to reproduce.
But thanks for trying to understand. :2razz:
 
Last edited:
Apocalypse said:
Or in other words, you completely misunderstood my position on this issue.
I am not saying everyone should reproduce immediately or he'll be shot, I'm saying that homosexuality prevents the option to reproduce.
But thanks for trying to understand. :2razz:
Click to expand...

No, I understand perfectly. Now, you riddle me this: some straight women take birth control pills their entire lives inorder to prevent EVER having children. Also, some homosexual women go to the sperm bank and actually DO reproduce. Now you tell me, according to your logic, which case fits your definition of "natural"?
 
I would vote the same way when the issue came up in my state which is against gay marriage. That includes closet supporter of gay marriage terms like "domestic partnerships", "civil unions" and any other paper coated term for marriage.


This asinine notion that calling it something different makes it different is a load of crap that politicians who are cowards on the issue use to try to appease both sides. If you are for gay marriage then quit fooling yourself by playing this semantics game. If you are actually against gay marriage then you shouldn't support paper coated terms like " civil unions", "domestic partnerships" or any other paper coated term for marriage. If I called a pile of dog **** a T-bone steak I can guarantee most people wouldn't eat it just because the name was changed.
 
Arcana XV said:
No, I understand perfectly. Now, you riddle me this: some straight women take birth control pills their entire lives inorder to prevent EVER having children. Also, some homosexual women go to the sperm bank and actually DO reproduce. Now you tell me, according to your logic, which case fits your definition of "natural"?
Click to expand...
I do not define words.
And about your little story, I'm speaking about gay couples here, not individuals.
 
Apocalypse said:
I do not define words.
And about your little story, I'm speaking about gay couples here, not individuals.
Click to expand...

Nice dodge. Who said the women in my story were not part of a couple?

Straight couples make the choice never to have children. Homosexual couples make the choice to have them.

Which one is more natural?

Given the enormous advances in reproductive medicine, the "unnatural" argument really doesn't hold any water anymore. People who really want children will have them and those who don't won't. It has nothing to do with sexual orientation anymore.
 
Arcana XV said:
Nice dodge.
Click to expand...
Why thank you.
Who said the women in my story were not part of a couple?
Click to expand...
I assumed she was since there was no mention of a couple. My mistake I guess.
Straight couples make the choice never to have children. Homosexual couples make the choice to have them.

Which one is more natural?

Given the enormous advances in reproductive medicine, the "unnatural" argument really doesn't hold any water anymore. People who really want children will have them and those who don't won't. It has nothing to do with sexual orientation anymore.
Click to expand...
This is not reproduction.
Homosexual couples cannot reproduce because they're from the same gender.
If two lesbians go to the sperm bank to take a sperm from some male, and then use it to create life with one of the lesbian's ovum, the other lesbian's genes would not be transferred into the created life.
 
yes, it is not a concern to me....
 
I would indeed vote for it to be legal. I am a Christian, but as a U.S. citizen, I realize that the Constitution is there for all regardless of race, creed, or religion. Therefor, homosexuals deserve every right that I enjoy in this great nation.
 
joko104 said:
Would you vote to legalizing same gender marriages if the issue was on an election ballot and you could vote in the election?

Only two options are given as that is how an election would work.
Click to expand...

Never!:doh
 
tlmorg02 said:
I would indeed vote for it to be legal. I am a Christian, but as a U.S. citizen, I realize that the Constitution is there for all regardless of race, creed, or religion. Therefor, homosexuals deserve every right that I enjoy in this great nation.
Click to expand...

You should make a decision, what is more important for you:

Bible or Constitution?
 
Alfons said:
You should make a decision, what is more important for you:

Bible or Constitution?
Click to expand...

Constitution.

To bad gays don't give a **** about it, though. They're to busy trying to practice their religious beliefs and reshaping the constitution to fit those religious beliefs, quoting pro-gm scripture from the bible in their ceremonies, to care about things like 'rule of law' or that legal institutions exist to serve specific purposes and not to supply the public with an endless buffet of legal brakes.
 
Last edited:
Jerry said:
Constitution.

To bad gays don't give a **** about it, though. They're to busy trying to practice their religious beliefs and reshaping the constitution to fit those religious beliefs, quoting pro-gm scripture from the bible in their ceremonies, to care about things like 'rule of law' or that legal institutions exist to serve specific purposes and not to supply the public with an endless buffet of legal brakes.
Click to expand...

Oh bull**** Jerry. Gays want to marry, nothing in the constitution says they can't, and your bizzaro world ideas about marriage is for children does not hold up.
 
Redress said:
Oh bull**** Jerry. Gays want to marry, nothing in the constitution says they can't, and your bizzaro world ideas about marriage is for children does not hold up.
Click to expand...

That's right, we can create gay-marriage just as we made a right for women to vote: through the legislative branch and the legislative exclusively.

The fact that gays are trying to force their religious beliefs onto the public through judicial fiat only demonstrates an extreme disrespect for the rule of law, favoring the bible over constitution.
 
Jerry said:
That's right, we can create gay-marriage just as we made a right for women to vote: through the legislative branch and the legislative exclusively.

The fact that gays are trying to force their religious beliefs onto the public through judicial fiat only demonstrates an extreme disrespect for the rule of law, favoring the bible over constitution.
Click to expand...

Desire for gay marriage is not a religious belief Jerry. Stop building strawmen.
 
Redress said:
Desire for gay marriage is not a religious belief Jerry. Stop building strawmen.
Click to expand...

Why are you trying to take one for the troll?

Step aside and let him answer for himself.
 
Jerry said:
Why are you trying to take one for the troll?

Step aside and let him answer for himself.
Click to expand...

I am not doing anything for anybody, merely pointing out your dishonesty in how you argue against gay marriage.
 
Apocalypse said:
Why thank you.
I assumed she was since there was no mention of a couple. My mistake I guess.
This is not reproduction.
Homosexual couples cannot reproduce because they're from the same gender.
If two lesbians go to the sperm bank to take a sperm from some male, and then use it to create life with one of the lesbian's ovum, the other lesbian's genes would not be transferred into the created life.
Click to expand...

The other lesbian can adopt her partner's biological children. The end result is one couple with children. Isn't that what some of you are saying marriage is all about to begin with, providing a stable environment for the little darlings? What does it matter how they were conceived?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom