- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- Messages
- 6,152
- Reaction score
- 2,344
- Location
- Pacific Northwest
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
All this talk of spousal ownership has gotten me thinking about a western "tradition" that is slightly related, and could be used to make an argument of ownership.
Engagement rings.
Why the **** does a man have to get on his knees and beg and BRIBE his prospective bride into becoming his wife?
Women don't have to humiliate themselves and prostrate themselves before their prospective grooms. Women need not bribe the man in order for the agreement to be reached.
Doesn't this bribe instill the image that a women must be "bought" or "bartered" for?
Why the hell doesn't the woman need to get on her knees and hold up a big screen TV and then beg for the MAN'S hand in marriage?!?!?!?
(I say big screen TV because a ring ain't gonna do it for a man. He'll need something more useful and practical than the finger shackle.)
Does that really happen? Men beg and use a ring for bribery?
I mean aside from your own experience, Tucker :2razz: