Question: did the deficit go up or down during Clinton's administration? Followup: how about during Carter, Reagan, Bush the elder, and Bush the younger?
Hello?
Question: Did The Rapist President have a budget surplus, as claimed?
Answer: No.
Question: Did The Rapist President have a Cold War to Fight?
Answer: No.
Question: Did The Rapist President have to clean up after the Democrat spawned S&L Crisis?
Answer: No.
Question: With the economy booming, did The Rapist President cut, marginalize, and eliminate any government programs intended to aid the poor and inept during times of economic downturn?
Answer: No.
Question: Was The Rapist President the most corrupt man to ever occupy the Oral...Oval Office?
Answer: Beyond measure, yes.
Those are several of the facts you have to address when heaping praise upon The Rapist Presidency.
Because of those facts, no honest American can praise The Rapist Presidency.
So what does that make you?
The deficit under The Rapist Presidency went down (didn't go to zero, didn't go negative), because, and only because, revenues rose with expenditures dropped for conditions that had absolutely no connection to any of the actions of the Rapist President.
Now, you mention The Idiot President and want to discuss his economic success. Well, Carter was the most inept president the nation ever had, and his utter failure as president got his sorry economically malaised ass hurled to the curb at the end of his first and thank the god that doesn't exist, only term.
Reagan the Great repaired what The Idiot broke, and then broke the Soviet Union, bringing the Cold War to an end.
The Oath Breaking President, Bush, had to clean up the aforementioned S&L crisis the Democrats imposed, and because he was foresworn, his tax hikes caused a recession that decreased federal revenues, just like The Messiah President is working so hard at doing.