So common sense and "reasonable" are now weasel words?
As I said:
They are subjective terms that allow you to apply your argument where you want to, rather than in a consistient manner
I note that you dont even bother to deny that...
It tells me something alright. It tells me you ignored most of my argument and don't want to admit that times and society's change and the laws must do so as well.
If thats what it tells you, then "common sense" and "reasonable" are traits you do not possess.
If the only way your argument works is when you apply it selectively across similar circumstances, based on when you think it makes sense, then your argument, at best, has HUGE holes in it.
This describes your technology argument -- that some items of technology are covered by the constitution and some arent, even though NONE of them are anything that the founders could have ever dreamed of.
And, to further address the unsoundness of your argument, lets interject a little 'common sense' -- which would Thomas jefferson find more familiar - an M16 or a computer hooked to the internet?
They are not legal, again it is just common sense.
You have got to be kidding. See above.
I see you didnt bother to answer my question.
You base your argument on requiring licenses for (whatever weapon) on the threat they pose to society.
Given that those that report the news, etc, pose at least that level of threat, as evidenced by the banning of certain actions they might take, what argument is there that they too should not also require a license?
You just proved my point for me, Thanks
Please read what I am saying and don't just gloss over it.
I havent proven anything -for- you -- I have, however, proven you to be subjective and inconsistent.
No, it doesnt -- its based on the legal concept that your rights extend so far as they do not harm anyone else. That's not "common sense", that s a basic tenet of what rights are.
This is what I am saying.
REALLY.
Tell me then:
What rights of yours do I violate by my simple possession of a weapon that is protected by the 2nd amendment?
PS you know why I changed my listing from Very Conservative to Moderate? Because I don't want to be associated with the lunacy I see coming from to many self proclaimed conservatives here.
Whatever, dude. I really dont care.