- Joined
- Feb 26, 2007
- Messages
- 13,988
- Reaction score
- 6,593
- Location
- Charlottesville, VA
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
First off, they shouldn't be to begin with. They should be able to control themselves or they shouldn't be soldiers.Like I said it is a whole list of things. Can you see to people in a combat unit being involved protected sex or not? It would be a disaster.
Secondly, how would it be a "disaster"?
Oh that is not a sexist statement without any evidence to back it up.
All you guys use said arguments for the reasons women shouldn't be there. Don't call me sexist for saying you all need to grow the **** up.
Let's see... two main arguments from the men:
1) The men will want to "protect" the women (problem with the men, not the women)
2)The men will be distracted (problem with the men, not the women)
So, the men are the ones making arguments that puts THEM as being the people with the problem, not the women.