Nope, but then, I'm not a terrorist out to kill people.
Why do you treat terrorist like victims? Do you have sympathy for them or agree with them?
Well, there is this thing called the rule of law.
As a man who has sworn an oath to the Constitution, so long as my enemy is a threat I can, will, and have sought them out and killed them.
However, once they lay down their arms, they are no longer a threat. And I am bound both by my reason and my oath (my honor), to do them no harm. In fact, this is a good thing.
You see, in the kinds of fighting where you go after terrorists, it is kind of hard to find them. Guess how you find them? Either the people tell you, which they won't if they think you are even worse than the bad guys because you torture people (many of whom are undoubtedly innocent when you started torturing people - sorry!) and if you torture them when you do get them they will one) resist, two) lie, three) make **** up, four) tell you whatever you want to hear. Torture almost never results in in good intelligence and if it is your method of intelligence, it invariably will go awry as good intelligence hits will eventually be corrupted by bad intelligence hits from the resulting use of torture.
Simply put, torture doesn't work. Those who advocate for it, or dehumanize someone in favor of torture usually have something else in mind, and that is usually human political power.
Honestly, the republicans lost exactly because they embraced this crap. Do you honestly think you will get back in power by further embracing dishonor and ... torture? Do you think getting up on a stage and saying, "I will torture for YOU!" (and they wonder WHY the Republican party is getting smaller?)impressed those of us out there actually doing the dirty work of counter-terrorism?
Once again, 'torture' even here, is about political power. Not about intelligence or saving lives. Always has been, always will be.
BTW, you are actually making our job harder, so kindly put a sock in it!!