It's very clear that there is evolution, and it's important. Evolution is here, and intelligent design is here, and they're both consistent.
People who want to exclude evolution on the basis of intelligent design, I guess they're saying, "Everything is made at once and then nothing can change." But there's no reason the universe can't allow for changes and plan for them, too.
People who are anti-evolution are working very hard for some excuse to be against it. I think that whole argument is a stupid one
Nobel Prize winner Charles Townes on evolution and "intelligent design"
Townes is saying evolution and intelligent design are NOT mutually exclusive. It is stupid to say "evolution" does not exist. It does. We know it does. You really have to put on blinders to say it negate it entirely on every single level.
I didn't look up your other folks but I'd bet money they say similar things. There really aren't any legitimate scientists disputing that evolution happens.
Originally Posted by justone said:
What is about the rest of the Nobel prize winners - are they tards? and the rest of the questions to your beLiefs. For instance I can expalin step by step why I used to have the same beliefs as you and Nobel Prize winner Charles Townes ( provided that you believe in ID). Since you believe in ID like Charles Townes "He's a perfect example of someone like me" - then should they teach ID like evolution in schools? .
Sure I do I used to have the same belief as Charles Townes, before I tried to read “Origins” ‘’After reading Origins of Life, with my background in chemistry and physics, it is clear evolution could not have occurred."“- Smalley’ After reading Origins of Life and talking to evolutionists I came to a different conviction than Smalley’ and Charles Townes .
However that said you can believe in evolution without believing the theory of evolution which states we all share a single common source. That all living organisms ultimately all trace back to one single first organism. Questioning that claim, being skeptical of that assertion, etc is not stupid. Saying there is NO evolution is entirely stupid.
There is no evolution, none, zero, zilch, no micro, no macro, no mini, no bikini, unless you explain to me the difference between mentality of an imbecile looking at phones which do exist and Darwin looking at fossils which do not exist, and answer the rest of the questions, instead of concentrating on a personal belief of Charles Townes… or Smalley
good night... may be for a few nights...