- Joined
- Oct 4, 2005
- Messages
- 69,534
- Reaction score
- 15,450
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
You didnt answer the question.
I have answered it multiple times. You don't like the answer.
Freedom from Western control.
You didnt answer the question.
How does fighting for the power to impose an oppressive theocracy equate to fighting for freedom?
No. You haven't.I have answered it multiple times.
Um... the point is that when living under an oppressive theocracy, you don't HAVE a choice?If one wants to live in a theocratic state why shouldn't they have that freedom?
You are a terrible debater, but a phenomenal entertainer.No. You haven't.
You know it, and you're stonewalling.
Did I miss your answer to my question?You are a terrible debater...
Um... the point is that when living under an oppressive theocracy, you don't HAVE a choice?
And so, fighting for the power to impose an oppressive theocracy CANNOT be 'fighting for freedom'.
No. You haven't.
You know it, and you're stonewalling.
Which one? I already explained how they were fighting for freedom. Unless you want me to answer the Gem that was "How many terrorists are fighting for freedom?". In that case, 7.Did I miss your answer to my question?
No, no I didnt -- because you havent answered it.
If I am such a terrible debater, why havent you answered my question?
Says he who refuses to address a question that diectly attacks the heart of the discussion.Listen, if you can't handle an academic discussion try another thread.
It would appear that you are a less amusing version of Truth Detector...Says he who refuses to address a question that diectly attacks the heart of the discussion.
I guess that means you won't be posting here any more.
I asked:Which one? I already explained how they were fighting for freedom.
It appears you have less intellectual honesty that hautey.It would appear that you are a less amusing version of Truth Detector...
Who is creating an oppressive theocracy? Who, in this thread, condoned a theocracy? Are you swinging at strawmen again?I asked:
How does fighting for the power to create an oppressive throcracy erquate to fighitng for freedom?
Neither you nor anyone else has answered that.
Says he who refuses to address a question that diectly attacks the heart of the discussion.
I guess that means you won't be posting here any more.
Awww, you are so good to me, baby.It appears you have less intellectual honesty that hautey.
I would like to see the one person who voted "No" to post their reason why.
This is the objective of Hamas, Hizbollah and AQ.Who is creating an oppressive theocracy?
Ah. The juvenile retort of someone that knows he can no longer carry his position.Great, go tell your babysitter that you won a debate and get your cookie.
This is the objective of Hamas, Hizbollah and AQ.
Please, try to keep up.
So...?
How does fighting for the power to create an oppressive throcracy erquate to fighitng for freedom?
Ah. The juvenile retort of someone that knows he can no longer carry his position.
Noted.
Irrelevant to my question. You know this; you're engaged in misirection and obfuscation in order to avoid having to give me an answer.Oh! Silly me! Did you miss the part when I asked who, in this thread, condoned a theocracy?
Irrelevant to my question. You know this; you're engaged in misirection and obfuscation in order to avoid having to give me an answer.
How does fighting for the power to create an oppressive throcracy erquate to fighitng for freedom?
...that goes directly to the heart of the matter?Why would I answer a question...
Ah. Attacking typos. The TRUE mark of a great debater.Do keep trying to spell big words properly, though
I'm glad you left out the part where I said your question was loaded and misrepresented my position. Do continue to attack doctored quotes of mine... The TRUE mark of a great debater....that goes directly to the heart of the matter?
Seems pretty obvious to me.
Ah. Attacking typos. The TRUE mark of a great debater.
:roll: