• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which is Islam's Main Goal: To Captivate, Convert or Kill Us?

Which is Islam's Main Goal: To Captivate, Convert or Kill Us?

  • Captivate

    Votes: 6 9.4%
  • Convert

    Votes: 24 37.5%
  • Kill

    Votes: 14 21.9%
  • None of the Above

    Votes: 27 42.2%
  • Other (Specify)

    Votes: 9 14.1%

  • Total voters
    64
Petty insults? Are you familiar with the term "irony"? :doh

Yes. Do you really want to continue down this road? I must warn you that you will lose and be very sorry. I've been restraining myself, but if you really want to take the gloves off that's fine with me. Take ti to the basement or whereever you do these types of things. I have to warn you. You really don't want to mess with me.
 
Last edited:
Yes. Do you really want to continue down this road? I must warn you that you will lose and be very sorry. I've been restraining myself, but if you really want to take the gloves off that's fine with me. Take ti to the basement or whereever you do these types of things. I have to warn you. You really don't want to mess with me.
What? You are doing this to yourself. You throw around personal attacks and then whine when others send it back your way. you criticize other's religions while failing to see fault with your own. You are beating yourself here, I don't even have to do anything except point it out.
 
What? You are doing this to yourself. You throw around personal attacks and then whine when others send it back your way. you criticize other's religions while failing to see fault with your own. You are beating yourself here, I don't even have to do anything except point it out.

Criticizing a religion is not attacking anyone personally. What is the title of this thread? Tell us.
 
Criticizing a religion is not attacking anyone personally.
Nor did I say it was. Would you like me to show you some of your own posts with personal attacks in them?

What is the title of this thread? Tell us.
"Maybe you should take a reading comprehension class" :cool:
 
Nor did I say it was. Would you like me to show you some of your own posts with personal attacks in them?


"Maybe you should take a reading comprehension class" :cool:

If I make a personal reply it is a reply to being personally attacked myself. I don't expect you to see that because those of your ilk never are able to see that. Your prejudice always gets in the way of your posts.

If you can't stand the heat then find another thread. I will continue to post on this topic as long as I choose. You're beating your head against the wall by choosing to make me the topic.

My reading comprehension is excellent. I do it for a living. Now get back to the topic please. You're bogging down the thread.
 
Last edited:
Wilders re-invited to speak at the House of Lords!
The House of Lords recovers its spine.

Wilders had been invited to screen Fitna before the House of Lords, but was then disinvited. In "The intimidation of the House of Lords," February 3, the incomparable Melanie Phillips (thanks to Pamela, who has more on Lord Ahmed) explains why, and what happened next:

But various representatives of the British Muslim community protested; and Lord Ahmed issued a threat that he would personally mobilise 10,000 Muslims to prevent Wilders from entering the Upper House and would take the peer organising the event to court. In the face of such threats, the meeting was cancelled.
Lord Ahmed then boasted of his victory in the Pakistani media. The Associated Press of Pakistan reported him exulting in


a victory for the Muslim community.

It was of course a major defeat for Parliament’s sovereign right and duty to protect free speech, the right to issue an invitation to a democratically elected member of a European parliament, and the right of British citizens to live without intimidation. It was an appalling development.

Now, however, it is fighting back. Wilders has been re-invited to speak and screen his film in the Lords later this month. Parliament now has a second chance to show that jihadi thuggery will not be allowed to prevail within the cradle of democracy. But if it is really to demonstrate this, it should also surely take action against Lord Ahmed, who abused his position as a peer of the realm to threaten mass intimidation of the House in which he sits. If it fails to do so, it will be another notch on the ratchet of Britain’s slide into submission.
Jihad Watch
 
The real image of your religion is what I see.

And who are you to have know the real Image of Islam ? You know that we (Muslims) cant get the real Image of Islam by only reading the verses,we must study arabic, read the prophet sayings, study the Interpretations of the verses, and then read the verses to recognize the real meaning of them. you want to convence me that you'd done all that, I bet you'd done nothing from it.

The terrorists are muslims and they get their ideas from the Koran. They aren't making this stuff up.

From your "Deep Study" of Koran, which verse tells us to kill innocents or non-Muslims ?

I suggest the sick mind are the ones among your religion who are murdering people in the name of Allah. I will post what I want.

YEAH, Now you said that by your self, "Sick Mind" , yes , terrorists are sick minds, I agree, how not if they kills innocents and pretend that they are making this in the name of Allah, go ask them where did Allah told them to kill innocents in the name of him.

You have said yourself that you would justify violence to further the cause of Islam. That is what you said. Not me. Don't tell me I am the one here who is brainwashed and has a sick mind.

Yup, I said so in war situations, and in situations like harming and torturing, we are asked to deffend our selfs, thats why Muslims were asked to kill Athiests and Pagans, they were killing and torturing them, If you'd readed the Koran (as you said before) you'd have discovered that they are the ones who drew the first blood.
 
And who are you to have know the real Image of Islam ? You know that we (Muslims) cant get the real Image of Islam by only reading the verses,we must study arabic, read the prophet sayings, study the Interpretations of the verses, and then read the verses to recognize the real meaning of them. you want to convence me that you'd done all that, I bet you'd done nothing from it.



From your "Deep Study" of Koran, which verse tells us to kill innocents or non-Muslims ?



YEAH, Now you said that by your self, "Sick Mind" , yes , terrorists are sick minds, I agree, how not if they kills innocents and pretend that they are making this in the name of Allah, go ask them where did Allah told them to kill innocents in the name of him.



Yup, I said so in war situations, and in situations like harming and torturing, we are asked to deffend our selfs, thats why Muslims were asked to kill Athiests and Pagans, they were killing and torturing them, If you'd readed the Koran (as you said before) you'd have discovered that they are the ones who drew the first blood.

People have been threatened with death for drawing cartoons of Mohammed. People have actually been murdered for leaving Islam.

Why?
 
I'm sure there were also over "Piss Christ"

Well, if anything, that one is more understandable. Pissin' on a man's diety is probably frowned upon in some circles.

But death threats over an anatomically correct Chocolate Jesus? Seems even more reactionary than a cartoon about Muhammad, to me.
 
I heard of that one but I didn't hear of any death threats. Do you have a link?

I really don't find it worth the time to find a link for you. I can tell you I worked across the street from the New Museum when the image was on exhibition there and I do remember the protesters.
 
I really don't find it worth the time to find a link for you. I can tell you I worked across the street from the New Museum when the image was on exhibition there and I do remember the protesters.

I think you should always back up your statements in a debate forum or else don't make them. I do. I always make sure I have a link before I even make a statement that might be questioned.
 
Thanks for the link.

Anyone who did that should be jailed if they can find them and if it is true. All we have is one person's word.

Well, two people, but that's irrelevant. Why would someone threaten death over that?

And you're attempt to protray this as something that is to be "disbelieved" is noted.

Now how about a link showing death threats over cartoons and murders committed because people left Islam. How about a link showing "honor killings' among family members for choosing a mate outside of Islam.

:confused: Why would I link that? It doesn't relate to my question at all.

I assume you are aware that these things did indeed occur at some time in Christiantiy's long and violent past, right?

YouTube - The Spanish Inquisition


;)
 
Back
Top Bottom