• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I'm calling you out : Did 1,200 Muslims die on 9/11/2001?

Did 1,200 Muslims die on 9/11/2001?

  • Total voters
    25
And yet this troll, still can't back up his claim. Let's get some evidence. Oh I'll wait while Ahmed pops on his anti-Jooos tin hat on, and then proceeds to regurgitate what his local imam tells him.
 
Tashah said:
You still don't seem to realize that you are promoting and relying on the exact same anti-Semitic canards as Czarist Russia and Hitlerian Germany.

What's next? The Secret Protocols of Zion?
Click to expand...

I still dont realize why do you keep quite until I hit that spot (Jews and Zionists). Are you tring to show that you are heavily biased or sth ?
 
Australianlibertarian said:
And yet this troll, still can't back up his claim. Let's get some evidence. Oh I'll wait while Ahmed pops on his anti-Jooos tin hat on, and then proceeds to regurgitate what his local imam tells him.
Click to expand...

My Imam told me: the best answer to an ignorant is to Ignore him.
 
It's a shame that you couldn't come up with that nugget yourself. Now back to the main issue, Ahmed we want you to substantiate your claims. You made the positive claim so it is up to you to show the evidence that suggests that 1,200 Muslims were killed on 9/11. In a debate, if you make the claim it is not up to the other side to find your info for you and then repudiate your claims.....

So first port of call is for you to produce evidence that suggest that the U.S government statistics are unreliable or not credible.

Secondly, then next port of call is to find the statistics that you claim are credible......

So there you go, if you want to keep trolling about Jooos and Zionists please feel free to do so; but in doing so you will further demonstrate your inability to debate the issues at hand.
 
Last edited:
bub said:
There is over 1 billion muslims.

It would be astonishing if less than 1,200 died on that day!
Click to expand...

He is talking about an even in the US where there are few Muslims. More than 1/3 of the dead Muslims? That is greater than the population of Muslims in the WORLD as a proportion of global population.

Please don't tell me you are drinking the kool aid on this one too.
 
Ahmed Shaheen said:
Anyone can claim anything unless you give them the true statics .
Click to expand...

Evidence has been provided by others and ignored by you. The only possible way there could have been that many Muslims killed in the WTC on that day (given the simple statistical factors against it) would be that Muslims are too DUMB and SLOW to get out of a burning building!
 
Ahmed Shaheen said:
Blackdog said:
Anyone can claim anything unless you give them the true statics .
Click to expand...

You have been given the actual names along with the statistics and odds according to the US Census, why would the government lie about the census???? Moron covers the Imam and yourself quite well.

Does not matter at this point as everyone but you seem to be reasonable.
Click to expand...
 
ludahai said:
Ahmed Shaheen said:
Him too. Anyone who honestly believes 1200 Musilms died in the WTC on 9/11 is a moron. Ok?
Click to expand...

Australianlibertarian said:
It's a shame that you couldn't come up with that nugget yourself. Now back to the main issue, Ahmed we want you to substantiate your claims. You made the positive claim so it is up to you to show the evidence that suggests that 1,200 Muslims were killed on 9/11. In a debate, if you make the claim it is not up to the other side to find your info for you and then repudiate your claims.....

So first port of call is for you to produce evidence that suggest that the U.S government statistics are unreliable or not credible.

Secondly, then next port of call is to find the statistics that you claim are credible......

So there you go, if you want to keep trolling about Jooos and Zionists please feel free to do so; but in doing so you will further demonstrate your inability to debate the issues at hand.
Click to expand...

I hadnt mentioned in any post that I do support this (Omar Shaheen's) saying, the reason I posted this quote is to show the Deficit in your statics, No specific true statics till now makes no right for you to object on any statics, I know that its a fantasy statics, but the wanted here is to prove the real statics if possible.
Click to expand...
 
Ahmed Shaheen said:
ludahai said:
I hadnt mentioned in any post that I do support this (Omar Shaheen's) saying, the reason I posted this quote is to show the Deficit in your statics, No specific true statics till now makes no right for you to object on any statics, I know that its a fantasy statics, but the wanted here is to prove the real statics if possible.
Click to expand...

You still have not provided anyone on this forum, with information that refutes the US government statistics. All you have made are opinions, but you have at no time backed them up with your evidence.

So I am asking you again Ahmed to back up your claim that you US Government statistics are incorrect. I am not asking you to blow up the sun, or stop time. All I am asking you to do is to provide some information that backs up your game.

Otherwise I might as well claim that 3 million people were killed as the result of the 9/11 attacks, because I believe that the US government statistics are incorrect.....

Simple, you make a claim and you back it up with evidence. Otherwise your opinions are not worth the pixels on your computer screen.
Click to expand...
 
Australianlibertarian said:
Ahmed Shaheen said:
You still have not provided anyone on this forum, with information that refutes the US government statistics. All you have made are opinions, but you have at no time backed them up with your evidence.

So I am asking you again Ahmed to back up your claim that you US Government statistics are incorrect. I am not asking you to blow up the sun, or stop time. All I am asking you to do is to provide some information that backs up your game.

Otherwise I might as well claim that 3 million people were killed as the result of the 9/11 attacks, because I believe that the US government statistics are incorrect.....

Simple, you make a claim and you back it up with evidence. Otherwise your opinions are not worth the pixels on your computer screen.
Click to expand...

OK ! let me see those TRUE statics and I will.
Click to expand...
 
You don't get it. YOU are making the ASSERTION that the US government statistics are incorrect, so in a debate the ONUS IS ON YOU to show us the evidence that repudiates the US governments statistics for the number of fatalities on 9/11. End of.

SO I ASK AGAIN, AHMED; WERE IS THE EVIDENCE POINTING OUT THAT THE US GOVERNMENT STATISTICS FOR THE FATALITIES ON 9/11 ARE INCORRECT OR FRAUDULENT?

Don't come here making factual claims and and then showing intellectual dishonesty and cowardice, by not backing up your assertions.

So please post me the evidence that backs up your claim. Simple.
 
Last edited:
Australianlibertarian said:
SO I ASK AGAIN, AHMED; WERE IS THE EVIDENCE POINTING OUT THAT THE US GOVERNMENT STATISTICS FOR THE FATALITIES ON 9/11 ARE INCORRECT OR FRAUDULENT?
Click to expand...

I got no evidences on that because there were no statics essentially from your government about Muslims who died in 9/11.
 
Wrong, you have previously made claims that we do not 'know' the real amount of people claimed on 9/11. This assertions is a positive claim, which means that to back up such a claim you must have knowledge of information that refutes the US Government statistics.

Now in previous posts, other posters have presented full lists of the 9/11 victims, and by looking at some of the names it would appear that a small percentage of those victims game from Arab or Muslim backgrounds.

In contrast you disbelieve these statistics and make claims that the stats are incorrect without providing any reason or evidence as to WHY the US Government statistics are incorrect.

So if you are going to make claims you need to back them up. What is the point of debating if you are reliant on suppositions? What is the point in debating, if you belief that the death toll is incorrect, and yet you cannot provide a single piece of evidence to dispute the official story.....
 
Australianlibertarian said:
Wrong, you have previously made claims that we do not 'know' the real amount of people claimed on 9/11. This assertions is a positive claim, which means that to back up such a claim you must have knowledge of information that refutes the US Government statistics.

Now in previous posts, other posters have presented full lists of the 9/11 victims, and by looking at some of the names it would appear that a small percentage of those victims game from Arab or Muslim backgrounds.

In contrast you disbelieve these statistics and make claims that the stats are incorrect without providing any reason or evidence as to WHY the US Government statistics are incorrect.

So if you are going to make claims you need to back them up. What is the point of debating if you are reliant on suppositions? What is the point in debating, if you belief that the death toll is incorrect, and yet you cannot provide a single piece of evidence to dispute the official story.....
Click to expand...

Why are you spinning me in circles ?
You (or the government) of course cant get the real statics of people died in 9/11.
Why denying any other static then ?
 
Why not? You have provided no evidence that suggests that it was impossible for the US Government to make an accurate fatality list. All you can do, is make a claim; which at this point is nothing more than your opinion.

Tell me Ahmed, do you understand the concept of making a claim and backing it up with empirical evidence? Do you understand how a debate works?

I am not spinning you in circles, IT IS YOU, THAT HAS COMPLETELY AND CATEGORICALLY FAILED TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS THAT THE US GOVERNMENT CANNOT OR COULD NOT MAKE AN ACCURATE FATALITY LIST FOR THE 9/11 ATTACKS.

So I am asking you again:

Why can't or why hasn't the US government been able to make an accurate statistical list of the people that died on 9/11?

This question is very simple to answer, all I am asking is for you to back up your claims. Simple.
 
Australianlibertarian said:
Why not? You have provided no evidence that suggests that it was impossible for the US Government to make an accurate fatality list. All you can do, is make a claim; which at this point is nothing more than your opinion.

Tell me Ahmed, do you understand the concept of making a claim and backing it up with empirical evidence? Do you understand how a debate works?

I am not spinning you in circles, IT IS YOU, THAT HAS COMPLETELY AND CATEGORICALLY FAILED TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS THAT THE US GOVERNMENT CANNOT OR COULD NOT MAKE AN ACCURATE FATALITY LIST FOR THE 9/11 ATTACKS.

So I am asking you again:

Why can't or why hasn't the US government been able to make an accurate statistical list of the people that died on 9/11?

This question is very simple to answer, all I am asking is for you to back up your claims. Simple.
Click to expand...

He isn't use to this Australianlibertarian.
On the Islamic boards they post anything and everything with zero proof and people take their word for it........:doh

Like here...
Islamic Forum interrupts its usual discussions to focus on the horrible IDF genocide of Gaza civilians and children.

Israel Has Managed To Lose Again - Islamic Forum
Click to expand...

While the site claims to be non violent all they do is spread hate which by the way is Harrm (sin) in Islam.
 
Last edited:
Australianlibertarian said:
Why can't or why hasn't the US government been able to make an accurate statistical list of the people that died on 9/11?
Click to expand...

Its like making a statics about how many ants are being raided daily..
there must be an in-accuarate answer in all the ways
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom