That sounds like a personal attack to me. I am not a warhawk, simply stating that defense spending goes back into the economy via increases in production, but hey, if you feel better shooting the messenger go ahead, it's not my fault you hold on to these notions that are provably wrong.
If the 'trickle down' effect worked out to be so great... government prints tax sponsored funds and sends it to a private corporation, sends enlisted civilians armed with the weapons these firms build, and as the equipment becomes used, broken, and or outdated, then MORE public funds and enlisted civilians go into it to create even further profits for a few multi-national corporations AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE!!
Yes, these enlisted soldiers are paid for their work, and funding does get returned into the economy, the vast majority winds up in the pockets of the very few CEO's of those few select companies. The only sense in which this money helps the economy is to continue that push for the poor to become poorer and the rich to become richer,
Well, that the economy in North America more or less RELIES on there being nearly continuous wars to keep the house of cards in tact, I suppose being a war-pushing nation would be a good thing, since basically every other factor of the producing economy has been shipped overseas where workers are paid pennies.
Yup, all neo-cons have acted the same for the past 8 years
in their blind support of our service ducking, lying, traitorist president.
There really isn't much of a difference, only degree of destruction.
:roll: :mrgreen:
Really, when it's the bankers that control the power structure (as evidenced by the 'banker bailout' and all related 'circumstance') it doesn't matter if it's the rebublicans or the democrats in power since it's these groups that pull the strings from behind the scenes, and it's with these people that the president of the day is giving his allegiences to.
Actually given your anti semetic diatribes against jews, wouldn't YOU be the one who supported hitler to the bitter end? :roll:
Now, I'm not exactly sure where the anti-semite calling came up, but to anyone capable of making distinctions, it's not 'jews' as in the regular people that you'll see in your neighbourhood. I have no personal problem with jews, however, like with any other group of people there are good and evil characters alligned with that group.
Now, if you see an brown guy stealing your bike, and you call the cops to report it.... is it racist to tell the cops the guys race?? Or are you just passing on the facts of a given case? It's the same type of distinction that must be made when talking about Jews especially... since anything even remotely suggesting that a jew might not be an upstanding character becomes 'anti-semitic hate-speech'... Again, since I'm not sure what brought this on, I'll leave it at that.
Yup the house communists act the same year after year with wild stories about lies and made up words like "traitorist" [sic].
Oh, no it's within the spirit of our country and the free market to 'bailout' the institutions that should be pushing the economy into prosperity rather than defrauding it's customers to the point where they become insolvent and must be rescued in order to prevent economic chaos.
If anything this bailout is a step closer to communism than I would have ever wanted to see (probly more accurate to say socialism)... and yet you see people that have 'national' pride in this emerging 'socialism'... 'national socialism' that would be a good thing, right?
If Bush were really HItler, the Bush haters on this board would have been made into lampshades along time ago and the others would be too terrified to spew their BDS nonsense here where anyone who understands computer forensics can find out who they are in a matter of minutes.
Here is the distinction between the Bush/clinton dynasties (of which Obama happens to be a continuation... but that's not important) :
Where Hitler was overtly aiming for world domination, the Bush /Clinton dynasty aims for world domination and control through incrementalisation. Taking over so slow that by the time everyone sees what's going on it will be too late to stop.
He is not Hitler. I think he is more like Hitler 2.0. Learned and wise from Hitler and not bound to make the same mistakes.
Exactly, by pushing people gradually into this new way, in much the same way that you walk a cow into the slaughterhouse.
I'm about as against Bush as one can legally get, but Bush is not Hitler.
No, but there is the VERY REAL possibliity that Bush was the next stepping stone in creating THE NEXT Hitler.