• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did Trump collude with the Russians?

Did Trump collude with the Russians? Y’know Russiagate.


  • Total voters
    81
  • Poll closed .
Not any more than Pelosi colluded with the Chinese.

Start a thread on your "whattaboutist" diversion. Support your opinions about Pelosi with links in your OP.

You've posted 3773 times in just three months. I've posted less that a third that number in 168 months.
I put some effort into informing readers where I found the information supporting the details in my posts.
I'm hoping you will understand how contributing in these threads is supposed to work.
 
Start a thread on your "whattaboutist" diversion. Support your opinions about Pelosi with links in your OP.

You've posted 3773 times in just three months. I've posted less that a third that number in 168 months.
I put some effort into informing readers where I found the information supporting the details in my posts.
I'm hoping you will understand how contributing in these threads is supposed to work.

???

I wasn't being literal.

Let's work on those critical reading skills ;)
 
WOW... 27 people who are totally ignorant about what is easily the biggest story in the past 40-years, if not century. My the Goebbels Media really brain ****s their followers hard.

Obama and his administration spying on and trying to frame Trump with Russian collusion.

To Russia with Love... from one Commi to another:
0B5AB2C8-8A87-4B00-9DBC-28DBF1EAD8A2.jpg

Flexibility... Yes... He... Has...
6D00FE21-F1A4-4F93-942E-6D8EC4C2ADF8.jpg
 
Hell trump is colluding with the Russians on this election too!

Lawmakers Are Warned That Russia Is Meddling to Re-elect Trump
A classified briefing to House members is said to have angered the president, who complained that Democrats would “weaponize” the disclosure.

Unfortunately it is a new York Times article and paywalled but there are plenty of other sources.

BBC on last time. How do you define collusion?

Trump Russia affair: Key questions answered

Trump Russia affair: Key questions answered - BBC News
 
WOW... 27 people who are totally ignorant about what is easily the biggest story in the past 40-years, if not century. My the Goebbels Media really brain ****s their followers hard.

Obama and his administration spying on and trying to frame Trump with Russian collusion.

...

Anybody else oriented to what is actually happening today? Full DC Appeals Court - 10 judges, hearing arguments for why Flynn should escape judgment "little people" would have to face if they declared their guilt under oath but COULD NOT later get the Attorney General of U.S. to rewrite the script, just for Flynn.

https://twitter.com/bradheath/status/1293225266584616965
And....


https://twitter.com/sfoguj/status/1293239901240979456
TrumpFlynnDOJvsConcordDismissal.jpg
 
Last edited:
No, there was no collusion - Mueller agreed.

There is no allowance for nuance in your opinion.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion” - Just Security
by Ryan Goodman
April 29, 2019

....As many experts have noted, what’s missing from the Mueller Report is the Special Counsel’s counterintelligence findings. We don’t know what the Special Counsel’s Office or the FBI have assessed, for example, with respect to whether Trump associates engaged in reciprocal efforts with Russian agents without entering a criminal agreement to do so, whether Americans have been witting or unwitting Russian assets, and what leverage or influence Moscow may have over particular individuals.

As a shorthand, we may use the term “collusion” to refer to these kinds of activities, which would be implicated in a counterintelligence analysis—though, as Asha Rangappa and I have written, the more analytically precise issues to consider are whether Trump Campaign associates “coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support” to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. Those are important questions regardless of whether such activities amounted to crimes, regardless of whether individuals’ actions and intentions can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, regardless of whether Americans acted as unwitting Kremlin assets in support of Russian operations, and regardless of whether individuals and organizations can be prosecuted without endangering First Amendment interests.

Although the Mueller Report does not squarely address these questions of “collusion” that fall outside the scope of potential criminal liability, it can be mined for substantive information that provides some meaningful answers.

What follows is a detailed guide to the Mueller Report’s evidence on collusion. The analysis discusses affirmative evidence and countervailing evidence in the Report, references the Special Counsel’s court filings and reliable news reports that help shed additional light on information in the Report, and identifies significant loose ends that the investigation was unable to answer.

I. Summary of Major Findings ......
 
Did Trump collude with the Russians? Y’know Russiagate.


No.
Hillary's camp did by having the dossier created in the first place, which solicited information from Russian sources.
 
Did he personally????? Did his campaign staff, absolutely. Did he know about it, probably. Like any good mafia don he maintained plausible deniability.
 
The correct answer is that it is unproven one way or another. We do not know.
We do know and it's disproven.

We know that the Mueller team, given unprecedented access, including thousands of hours of interviews and millions of documents, was forced by the evidence to exonerate the Trump campaign. That's damn close to disproving it. We also know the source and can track the development of the narrative. That finishes the job.

We do however know that the Trump campaign was not only willing, but absolutely eager to do so(and only failed due to their incompetence). We also know that Russia did interfere in the election, working to help Trump.
Listening to an offer and refusing to pay is hardly incompetence.
 
We do know and it's disproven.

We know that the Mueller team, given unprecedented access, including thousands of hours of interviews and millions of documents, was forced by the evidence to exonerate the Trump campaign. That's damn close to disproving it. We also know the source and can track the development of the narrative. That finishes the job.


Listening to an offer and refusing to pay is hardly incompetence.

They never exonerated anyone. They said the evidence was there. They could not indite a sitting president. It was congress job to take the proper steps. The democrats in the house impeached him and the republicans In the Senate let him off the hook
 
We do know and it's disproven.

We know that the Mueller team, given unprecedented access, including thousands of hours of interviews and millions of documents, was forced by the evidence to exonerate the Trump campaign. That's damn close to disproving it. We also know the source and can track the development of the narrative. That finishes the job.


Listening to an offer and refusing to pay is hardly incompetence.

I'm not saying I'm a "great brained" graduate of Trump University, or anything like that, but something doesn't smell right, considering what Trump is saying this week about his DOJ "poodle". William Barr, the son of a private school administrator who gave Jeffrey Epstein, a young man without degree or experience, Epstein's first access to "young ones".

If I had even the slightest suspicion I might be "culted", unable to think for myself, bombarded by Trump, Hannity-Fox, Sara Carter, John Solomon, Wahington Examiner, NY Post, Rush, Levin, "sundance" @theconservativetreehouse, Chuck Ross @dailycaller, I would at least ask myself,

"self, why do none of the above appear on MSM, or agree to give interviews to Variety, The New Yorker, Rollingstone, BBC, NY Times, Washington Post, or Chuck Todd, on Meet the Press, Axios, The Atlantic, or Politico? IOW, what are they afraid of?"

Sabotaging the Postal Service and whining like a corrupt third world dictator is unbecoming of even an openly corrupt U.S. POTUS,

but it inspires hope to smell the angst emanating from Him as he states on camera that if Barr does not throw his entire reputation away attempting an attack on this country's intelligence infrastructure and rule of law, he just can't be Trump's "Roy Cohn", anymore.

If this is what "being wronged by Obama, Biden, Comey, Brennan, and "the two lovers" looks like, I'd also consult my family doctor about a mental and emotional health evaluation, just on the slim chance I might be unwittingly enabling this "hot mess"!

US intel report on Russia could undercut Trump's hopes for Durham probe

(CNN logo) US intel report on Russia could undercut Trump's hopes for Durham probe
Aug. 13, 2020

The US intelligence community assessment that Russian interference in the 2020 election favors President Donald Trump threatens to undercut his hopes that prosecutor John Durham will discredit the origins of the FBI's Russia investigation into his 2016 campaign.
.....

....Trump and allies have sought to build expectations that Durham could deliver last-minute surprise findings to boost the President before the election.

The President used a Fox Business interview Thursday to make clear that he wants an election assist from Durham and Barr, and that he would be disappointed if Barr can't deliver.
Trump goes after FBI director Wray, whom he appointed, and issues warning to Barr - CNNPolitics

"Bill Barr has a chance to be the greatest of all time," Trump told host Maria Bartiromo. "But if he wants to be politically correct he'll be just another guy."

Trump's comments came after Barr for the first time said it's possible Durham's work will continue past November, though Barr is pushing to release at least some conclusions before the presidential election.

"We're all aware of the calendar and we're not going to do anything for the purposes of affecting an election, but we are trying to get some things accomplished before the election," Barr told conservative commentator Buck Sexton in an interview that aired Wednesday.

Before his appointment as attorney general, Barr had made clear his skepticism of the 2016 investigation of the Trump campaign. Even as he prepared to help close special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, Barr was exploring appointing a new investigator to scrutinize the origins of the probe, which he believed was without merit.....
 
Last edited:
We know that the Trump / Russia collusion thing was a hoax. However, it has been proven that the Cinton campaign and DNC did though.
 
What documented facts are you speaking of ?

You actually want me to list the facts associated with the lying and scheming of Clapper, McCabe, Comey, Strozk, Paige, and Brenner? Don't you read the news?
Do you usually expect others to do you research for you?

see this
Comey, Rice, Clapper among GOP senator's targets for subpoenas amid Obama-era probe | TheHill

Comey, Rice, Clapper among GOP senator's targets for subpoenas amid Obama-era probe
By Jordain Carney - 05/28/20 07:51 PM EDT
Some of the most high-profile figures of the Obama administration are among a list of officials Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) would like to subpoena as part of his investigation into the FBI's probe of Russian election meddling and the Trump campaign.

The list, released by Johnson's office on Thursday night, comes after he scheduled a committee vote for June 4 to seek subpoena authority.

Former FBI Director James Comey, former national security adviser Susan Rice, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan are among dozens of officials Johnson will request authority to subpoena.
 
They never exonerated anyone. They said the evidence was there. They could not indite a sitting president. It was congress job to take the proper steps. The democrats in the house impeached him and the republicans In the Senate let him off the hook

First, a prosecutor is not looking to exonerate anyone. They look to indict or not indict. They dont announce that a subject of an investigation has been exonerated. That would be stupid on their part.


Second "they" never said that the evidence is there. They said the exact opposite.


Mueller never said that the only reason there's no indictment is because Trump is the current POTUS. He was simply asked a question about the indictment of a sitting president and he responded with long established justice department policy.
 
We know that the Trump / Russia collusion thing was a hoax. However, it has been proven that the Cinton campaign and DNC did though.

Why would Flynn's NSA asst., KT MacFarland, a Fox talking head and self described, personal friend of Trump, disagree with you, under oath? The "bliss" in the old saying, explains why ignorance promotes sound sleep.

FlynnMacfarland3rdRevision302_3of4.jpg

FlynnMacfarland3rdRevision302_4of4.jpg
 
All evidence points to Hillary colluding with Putin and trying her best. Trump is way too tough on poor Russia, but it's still better than bending over like Obama did or Hillary wanted to. Putin is on record saying he doesn't care who wins, but would prefer Hillary, which makes sense as the Dems never did meet a bad deal they didn't like.

I hope Trump does collude this time tho, get on the phone with those Russian hackers, if they're willing, even give them some incentives, and get to the bottom of all these scandals and treasonous actions by the far left and their supporters.

The biggest mistake Trump made by far is not firing every single Obama holdover when he took office, if he did that none of this treason and the coup attempt would happen. Time to learn from Democrats, Republicans should learn to play the game better. The Dems have this election down even if Repubs have way more support as election fraud and cheating is done to perfection, and Repubs are too high and mighty to even try it, they think bussing people to a poll station is not above board, all the while the Dems have dead people and Canadians, and even non-existent people voting. Ridiculous.

That is some very deep Cult work, comrade. Well done.
 
We know that the Mueller team, given unprecedented access, including thousands of hours of interviews and millions of documents, was forced by the evidence to exonerate the Trump campaign.

See, you of the Cult only memorized the lies of people like Bill Barr and never looked at the truths Bob Mueller spoke:



Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump
Mueller declares his Russia report did not exonerate Trump
 
You actually want me to list the facts associated with the lying and scheming of Clapper, McCabe, Comey, Strozk, Paige, and Brenner? Don't you read the news?
Do you usually expect others to do you research for you?

see this
Comey, Rice, Clapper among GOP senator's targets for subpoenas amid Obama-era probe | TheHill

Comey, Rice, Clapper among GOP senator's targets for subpoenas amid Obama-era probe
By Jordain Carney - 05/28/20 07:51 PM EDT
Some of the most high-profile figures of the Obama administration are among a list of officials Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) would like to subpoena as part of his investigation into the FBI's probe of Russian election meddling and the Trump campaign.

The list, released by Johnson's office on Thursday night, comes after he scheduled a committee vote for June 4 to seek subpoena authority.

Former FBI Director James Comey, former national security adviser Susan Rice, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan are among dozens of officials Johnson will request authority to subpoena.

Oh, you cultists can be so funny sometimes. And, by funny, I mean all of its definitions.
 
I'd say so, a lot of presidents have colluded with Russia and enemies of the U.S., the world is a gray area. It is not as black and white as a lot of people make it out to be. Terrible poll btw.
 
Mueller never said that the only reason there's no indictment is because Trump is the current POTUS. He was simply asked a question about the indictment of a sitting president and he responded with long established justice department policy.

Just in case you needed a bit of help:

the current POTUS = a sitting president

Thus, your entire comment literally makes no sense as a result of your not realize those to conditions are identical.
 
Back
Top Bottom