• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Firearms - The Primary Problem

The primary problem with firearms


  • Total voters
    45
What is the "problem" ? Did the weapon jam ? Was the round a dud ?

I think you need to be more specific about this alleged "problem".
 
I'm with the firearm version of: Pebcak (problem exists between chair and keyboard).

That's why there should be a major study conducted on the effects of video games on the youngest generation to determine if there is a cause and effect on young people committing random acts of violence.

The 8 year old who killed his dad and the dad's friend seemed well adjusted to killing. Not just shooting, as his dad may have taught him, but killing.

That may have come from an over exposure to violent games. Just as not everyone who drinks is an alcoholic, not every kid who plays "Grand Theft Auto" is going to go on a shooting rampage.

But some may.

We need to KNOW THE TRUTH about the effects of video games and acts of violence in this country.
 
What is the "problem" ? Did the weapon jam ? Was the round a dud ?
I think you need to be more specific about this alleged "problem".
Improper headpace. Could be any number of causes.
 
I would say both since each without the other is ineffective.
 
I would say both since each without the other is ineffective.
Incorrect.
Someone that wants to kill someone else, especially in cold blood, will always find a way.
 
Incorrect.
Someone that wants to kill someone else, especially in cold blood, will always find a way.

That wasn't the question. :roll:
 
Well most of the time when you miss, its usually operator error. But sometimes the weapon can be the problem, with a warped barrel and such.
 
The true main problem with firearms is that there aren't enough, many have been forbidden to us, and more and more the government tries to encroach on our right to keep and bear arms. There should never have been an "assault rifle" ban (especially because it didn't ban a gun and people in Congress didn't know what they were voting on), fully automatic weapons should not be illegal, etc.
 
That wasn't the question. :roll:
No, but it addresses your answer.
You state that without the gun, the person pulling the trigger isnt effective at whatever it might be that he was using the gun for.
That's not necessarily the case at all.
 
No, but it addresses your answer.
You state that without the gun, the person pulling the trigger isnt effective at whatever it might be that he was using the gun for.
That's not necessarily the case at all.

Then the topic is no longer the issue between a firearm and a user but some other type of weapon which is not part of the question.
 
Then the topic is no longer the issue between a firearm and a user but some other type of weapon which is not part of the question.
This doesnt in any way change the invalidity of your response.
 
Person pulling the trigger...until a gun is taught how to fire all by itself.

Don't you know that they jump up and kill people all by themselves? Where have you been? Jeez, I have quite a few guns and I really have to be careful not to piss them off.

Only a leftist idiot will believe what I just said.
 
Incorrect.
Someone that wants to kill someone else, especially in cold blood, will always find a way.

Yes, I believe it is the intent to kill that is the problem. Should we ban everything that a person can kill another person with? If that's the case, everyone will have to have their hands chopped off.

Step right up...the line forms to the left.:roll:
 
This doesnt in any way change the invalidity of your response.

Rrriiiggghhhttt. You have so obviously shown how "invalid" my response to the topic was.

:rofl
 
Rrriiiggghhhttt. You have so obviously shown how "invalid" my response to the topic was.

:rofl
Yes, I have, as anyone reading the thread will plainly see.
 
This doesnt in any way change the invalidity of your response.

...man you're starting to believe your own hype aren't you. :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom