• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will humanity ever outgrow war?

Thoughts?

  • Humanity will never outgrow war.

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • I highly doubt humanity will outgrow war.

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • I don't know.

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • It's possible that humanity will outgrow war.

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Humanity will someday outgrow war.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    13
getting into dystopia if you are stopping crimes before they happen you might be able to stop violence some day but you would have to starve out splinter groups literally deny them resources until they died or reprogram those that just shun people who wont follow their community standards and you would have to hold them prisoner from going off on their own to establish their own society elsewhere or dominate places in the larger society

and theirs nothing to stop less benign people form developing ai in the 1st place

Reaching the utopian singularity would definitely be a process. For a while we would just have to work with the fact that some people are difficult or crazy. Given enough time it might be possible though.
 
im sure they could dominate but you overlooking that people may adopt some engineering and not all of it but you could also be breeding relatively small but self sustaining pockets of counter culture

unless your wiling to separate children or set up the ai as para-well over parents that all people must live under

I haven't worked out every kink yet but I think there might eventually be a way there that isn't draconian.
 
Reaching the utopian singularity would definitely be a process. For a while we would just have to work with the fact that some people are difficult or crazy. Given enough time it might be possible though.

not without violence and subjugation
 
I haven't worked out every kink yet but I think there might eventually be a way there that isn't draconian.

i think and hope non draconian governments with ai and enhanced humans could dominate and vastly limit the power and territory of violent and oppressive people even ones with their own ai and enhanced population but i dont think they can ever wipe those traits out entirely
 
Is there a better direction to go in?

expanding around the warlike and dominating putting pressure on them to change their ways without seizing absolute power over them/killing them
 
Could prosperity and technology make that possible? We still just barely understand how our own brains work. Maybe one day we will be the masters of our own evolution.

I would say that it will help, but we will continue to have sociopaths and other people without much empathy or strong drives to put themselves first. That can be fixed somewhat through therapy in cases where it is learned behaviour, but in cases where it is a physiological defect, would we need to figure out how to re-engineer the brain?
 
"I highly doubt humanity will outgrow war" for one reason, ideological disagreement.

Let these sink in a bit and we'll discuss them...

"When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European or anything else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating yourself from the rest of mankind. When you separate yourself by belief, by nationality, by tradition, it breeds violence." - Jiddu Krishnamurti

"Religions, to a large extent, became divisive rather than unifying forces. Instead of bringing about an ending of violence and hatred through a realization of the fundamental oneness of all life, they brought more violence and hatred, more divisions between people as well as between different religions and even within the same religion. They became ideologies; belief systems people could identify with and so use them to enhance their false sense of self. Through them they could make themselves 'right' and others 'wrong' and thus define their identity through their enemies, the 'others', the 'nonbelievers' or 'wrong believers' who not infrequently they saw themselves justified in the killing.” - Eckhart Tolle

"Oddly, it is individualism that brings like-minded people together into some form of tribalism as a form of comfort, but history proven that inherently and intentionally separates us from others deemed outside that tribe, what has to be discarded for entry is empathy for others and it is replaced with any 'ism that generates pride in that tribalism, a long enough timeline the first calls are for marginalization of those outsiders for being in some way adversaries usually appealing to fear but with the ending point being justification for someone else's life coming to a violent end. You will never meet most of these people, never see their faces, never know how they experience life... but you will be told their deaths are important to your life, the 'ism will be the reason but ultimately we are still talking about one thing and one thing only, justification for loss of life even if they themselves did absolutely nothing violent to anyone else." - Me, an argument made in a more structured debate regarding sociology but within the confines of philosophy.
 
I would say that it will help, but we will continue to have sociopaths and other people without much empathy or strong drives to put themselves first. That can be fixed somewhat through therapy in cases where it is learned behaviour, but in cases where it is a physiological defect, would we need to figure out how to re-engineer the brain?

I wonder how advanced therapy techniques might become in the future. I have read some interesting stuff about using LSD to break barriers in therapy much more rapidly. I think it could definitely be possible to use technology to reverse things like psychopathy.
 
I wonder how advanced therapy techniques might become in the future. I have read some interesting stuff about using LSD to break barriers in therapy much more rapidly. I think it could definitely be possible to use technology to reverse things like psychopathy.

It is getting more advanced all the time as we continue to better understand the physiological mechanisms of the brain and move away from the old greek model of the mind being somewhat independent of the body:

EMDR Therapy (Eye Movement Desensitization & Reprocessing)

That right there is pretty much sci-fi brain hacking stuff, its really cool.
 
War - What is it good for?

What if the world is eventually governed by AI? Also is it possible for us to evolve and become wired differently? Is it possible that through the development of DNA technology we will be able to control our own evolution?

Stories & novels of AI controlling the known universe run throughout science fiction. Most of them don't end well - Why would an AI care about humanity? & higher order primates need a lot of resources - energy, temperature, humidity, weather control. Food (correct proportions), water, air, shelter, clothing, entertainment. & of course we'd want our food animals & pets - cattle, sheep, chickens, pigs, dogs, cats, goldfish ...

development of DNA technology, control our own evolution - That would take wisdom, & a very long-range view of the World. I don't think we're up to it, just yet. But yes, that's probably not going to stop people (nations, corporations) from tinkering with the technology. We'll just have to hope that they don't make any fatal mistakes in their experiments.
 
Re: War - What is it good for?

Stories & novels of AI controlling the known universe run throughout science fiction. Most of them don't end well - Why would an AI care about humanity? & higher order primates need a lot of resources - energy, temperature, humidity, weather control. Food (correct proportions), water, air, shelter, clothing, entertainment. & of course we'd want our food animals & pets - cattle, sheep, chickens, pigs, dogs, cats, goldfish ...

development of DNA technology, control our own evolution - That would take wisdom, & a very long-range view of the World. I don't think we're up to it, just yet. But yes, that's probably not going to stop people (nations, corporations) from tinkering with the technology. We'll just have to hope that they don't make any fatal mistakes in their experiments.

People tend to be pretty pessimistic. Maybe it won't turn out that bad.
 
Re: War - What is it good for?

People tend to be pretty pessimistic. Maybe it won't turn out that bad.

All-powerful regimes tend to run amok. & that's just the human ones. An AI would presumably be optimized to not have any emotions nor sentimental attachments, including towards humanity. So how long would it take an all-powerful AI to conclude that humanity doesn't add much to the mix anymore? & once we (humans) don't justify the expense of keeping us around, Why would an AI decide to keep us anyway, & eat the costs?
 
Re: War - What is it good for?

All-powerful regimes tend to run amok. & that's just the human ones. An AI would presumably be optimized to not have any emotions nor sentimental attachments, including towards humanity. So how long would it take an all-powerful AI to conclude that humanity doesn't add much to the mix anymore? & once we (humans) don't justify the expense of keeping us around, Why would an AI decide to keep us anyway, & eat the costs?

AI does or will do everything else better than we can. Maybe it'll do the government better too. If we can create artificial emotions maybe they'll actually care about us. Just a thought.
 
Re: War - What is it good for?

AI does or will do everything else better than we can. Maybe it'll do the government better too. If we can create artificial emotions maybe they'll actually care about us. Just a thought.

AI Maybe it'll do the government - & what kind of government would AI require? My assumption here is that the AI would be managing the non-AIs - How bright does it have to be to do that?

artificial emotions - Why would anyone design artificial emotions into an AI? Wouldn't that be defeating the entire purpose of designing & building an AI in the first place?
 
Re: War - What is it good for?

How bright does it have to be to do that?

Very.

artificial emotions - Why would anyone design artificial emotions into an AI? Wouldn't that be defeating the entire purpose of designing & building an AI in the first place?

Maybe it will only have the good ones, like empathy.
 
What if the world is eventually governed by AI? Also is it possible for us to evolve and become wired differently? Is it possible that through the development of DNA technology we will be able to control our own evolution?

If you don't want the consequences of AI ruling the World, you'd best not put them in charge.

Painting an image of Mickey Mouse on a thermonuclear bomb does not change the bomb's function in any way.

An AI is probably beyond human ken - & therefore wishful thinking about what their actions would be in any given situation, based on human logic, is very likely to be incorrect. It would probably be safer to leave them out of the equation, because their notion of stability may consider the presence of humans to be optional.
 
Last edited:
If you don't want the consequences of AI ruling the World, you'd best not put them in charge.

Painting an image of Mickey Mouse on a thermonuclear bomb does not change the bomb's function in any way.

An AI is probably beyond human ken - & therefore wishful thinking about what their actions would be in an given situation, based on human logic, is very likely to be incorrect.

The vast majority of people seem to believe it'd be some dystopian nightmare. Maybe they're incorrect?
 
Could there be a day when it only exists in history? What would it take to get to that point? I think it's possible if technology is capable of accommodating the needs of all. Is it possible that any species with a tendency towards violence is doomed to destroy itself with its own technology? If we develop the ability to traverse the universe we will surely also have developed terrifying forms of weaponry. Can those things coexist? Maybe our violent nature is why the aliens don't seem too interested in dropping in and sharing what they know with us. Maybe our only hope for long term survival is to outgrow our violence.




We kind of have.

We didn't fight the Russians at all during the Cold War.

Our allies fought their allies in places like Vietnam, Cuba, Afghanistan, and Korea.

Nether America or the Soviet Union wanted to get into a nuke shooting match.
 
We kind of have.

We didn't fight the Russians at all during the Cold War.

Our allies fought their allies in places like Vietnam, Cuba, Afghanistan, and Korea.

Nether America or the Soviet Union wanted to get into a nuke shooting match.

Yep.

Part of me thinks there won't be another war between major nations. It's not profitable.
 
Could there be a day when it only exists in history? What would it take to get to that point? I think it's possible if technology is capable of accommodating the needs of all. Is it possible that any species with a tendency towards violence is doomed to destroy itself with its own technology? If we develop the ability to traverse the universe we will surely also have developed terrifying forms of weaponry. Can those things coexist? Maybe our violent nature is why the aliens don't seem too interested in dropping in and sharing what they know with us. Maybe our only hope for long term survival is to outgrow our violence.

The only possible way it could happen is if some entity took over the entire world, sort of what Hitler aspired to. But even that would be damned near impossible to stop fighting.
 
Back
Top Bottom