• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The 2nd amendment

Your thoughts?

  • Repeal it and take outlaw guns.

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Amend it and outlaw some guns.

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Leave it alone.

    Votes: 15 65.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 6 26.1%

  • Total voters
    23
I’m guessing Blue Donkey has never held a gun in their life.

BTW, you have any opinion on guns chambered in 300BLK?

Yeah-if you want to put a can on a AR 15, that is a good choice for caliber. If not, why bother?
 
Does this apply to black/brown gun owners as well?
 
Yeah-if you want to put a can on a AR 15, that is a good choice for caliber. If not, why bother?

Yeah, kin of leaning that direction. Saw an interview with the guy who started AAC and developed the round. Pretty interesting.
 
I think Trix meant they couldn’t be manufactured for civilian use after 1986.

Trix needs to understand that the 2nd Amendment doesn't give anyone the right to keep and bear arms.
 
Trix needs to understand that the 2nd Amendment doesn't give anyone the right to keep and bear arms.

It prevents the federal government-and with the 14th amendment, from interfering with a right the fathers of this nation knew you already had
 
Trix didn’t say that it did.
Trix presented the following infringement:

"US federal law mandates that fully automatic weapons made before 1986 to be registered with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. No fully automatic firearms made after 1986 can be registered, and, therefore, they are illegal to buy except under certain circumstances.


You're welcome."

I'm not claiming that infringement doesn't exist.

I'm just saying that it's an infringement. ;)

All "gun control" policies are infringements.
 
Trix presented the following infringement:

"US federal law mandates that fully automatic weapons made before 1986 to be registered with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. No fully automatic firearms made after 1986 can be registered, and, therefore, they are illegal to buy except under certain circumstances.


You're welcome."

I'm not claiming that infringement doesn't exist.

I'm just saying that it's an infringement. ;)

All "gun control" policies are infringements.

Yes, I agree with that.
 
No weapons that have any automatic firing capabilities should be allowed. When someone pulls the trigger, no more than one bullet can come out of it.

You realize semi automatic weapons only fire one bullet with a trigger squeeze but you just said those should be illegal.
 
Meanwhile... guns are flying off the shelf by the pallet. Hell, my “oh so liberal guns scare me” grand daughter called me and asked me for a gun. (Hell no). I told her to scream and spray him in the face with the de icer I bought her and get the hell out.

My brother who is a card carrying liberal bought 2 S&W and obtained a carry permit. We are witnessing real time just one of the reasons the 2A exist

-VySky
 
The Republican (7-2) Supreme Court erred with its very recent 5-4 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) stating for the first time that the right to bear arms is individual. The court needs to reverse itself to accept the understanding until then that the right is collective, meaning that it has to do with state militias (Home Guard).


That will come to pass within five years.
 
Back
Top Bottom