• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who SHOULD Biden pick as his running mate?

Who SHOULD he pick?

  • Abrams

    Votes: 8 13.8%
  • Cortez Masto

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Demings

    Votes: 4 6.9%
  • Duckworth

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • Harris

    Votes: 13 22.4%
  • Klobuchar

    Votes: 17 29.3%
  • Rice

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • Warren

    Votes: 10 17.2%
  • Whitmer aka Big Gretch

    Votes: 2 3.4%

  • Total voters
    58
  • Poll closed .
Your definition of "TDS" is pointing out the reality that your president is a piece of garbage elected by a garbage populace. That's not "TDS" that's reality.

so you are calling people such as me-garbage and you wonder why you all lost? Liberals constantly pretend they are more enlightened and intelligent than those of us who don't feel a need for a nanny state government to take care of us. I understand why you make such claims-for lefties to justify running the lives of others, they have to pretend they know what is better for those "others" than the others themselves. But its all BS. Competent independent and self sufficient people don't need public sector parents. We want to be left alone. Now most of the lefties will pretend they are elite and they want to be deciding what others do: however, the fact is, most of those who want big government are afraid of failing and they want someone or something to insulate them from the cost of their own bad decisions.
 
Great. Don't hire him to be an associate in your law firm then.
Not sure I would hire Joe Biden to do anything. I can't think of any defining strengths or accomplishments. Can you?
 
Biden isn't really on the ballot. Trump and Not Trump is the election.

Trump is running as an arrogant, ignorant, impulsive, dishonest narcissistic man-child who's ineptness and lack of empathy just killed 10's of thousands of Americans plus put the economy into a tailspin that we will not recover from for at least a year. The call for leadership went out and Trump put the call on call forwarding. At least he was smart enough to know he was over his head.

Trump just alienated the senior vote, while swing voters are tired of the dysfunction and acrimony. Few want any more this. With double digit unemployment and the pandemic remaining out of control, Trump has almost no path to victory.

well if you are going to lie, you might as well tell a whopper.
 
Not sure I would hire Joe Biden to do anything. I can't think of any defining strengths or accomplishments. Can you?

Food taster?
 
Abrams and Harris will further divide the country.

Yep, nothing more divisive to some people than a black lady with power

Whitmer is going to cost the democrats Michigan.

Yep, that would be a really bad idea to have a governor with 72% support on the ticket. It will surely cost you the state.

Warren is a liar and lost most of her support because of it. Rice is a liar, remember the cause of the Benghazi attack. Demmings was a pawn on the impeachment committee, how will she help bring the nation together? Duckworth too liberal and that leaves Masto, who is she?

Ah, Benghazi again.... eight times they found nothing, yet you just can't let it go.... meanwhile investigations of the current White House consistently led to firings, indictments and even 1000 former US attorney's telling us the POTUS himself committed federal indictable crimes.... but you are still fixed on Benghazi....

I think you need to get your news from sources that are not trying to (and succeeding at) manipulating you.

Meanwhile, I think you need to get use to your Vice President Harris. It has a nice ring to it, don't ya think?
 
The right? Not most decent people? Alrighty then.

By the way, you've incorrectly used the quote marks. They can be used to indicate a reversal of meaning, but in the case of Willie Brown, he was legally married, not "married."

Good to know that disapproving of extramarital relationships is now "sexist."

I hope so! Thank you!


Most decent people don't judge when they don't know the particulars. I've noticed that rarely stops the right wing smear campaign.


Thank you so much for your instruction on the use of quote marks. It is my personal opinion that a man that has been separated from his wife for 12 years and has had several relationships is "married."

Did I call you sexist? I think judgmental would be the correct word. Your disapproval of "extramarital" (yup, the quotes again) leads you to label a woman a whore. Without knowing a thing about it. Really sad.
 
Biden isn't really on the ballot. Trump and Not Trump is the election.

Trump is running as an arrogant, ignorant, impulsive, dishonest narcissistic man-child who's ineptness and lack of empathy just killed 10's of thousands of Americans plus put the economy into a tailspin that we will not recover from for at least a year. The call for leadership went out and Trump put the call on call forwarding. At least he was smart enough to know he was over his head.

Trump just alienated the senior vote, while swing voters are tired of the dysfunction and acrimony. Few want any more this. With double digit unemployment and the pandemic remaining out of control, Trump has almost no path to victory.

Your post is drivel.
 
He did. Anyone who doesn't see it has TDS.

And I'm saying...even if he did (and he didn't)...it wouldn't matter anyway because Trump is so many times worse that literally anything Biden does pales by comparison.
 
And I'm saying...even if he did (and he didn't)...it wouldn't matter anyway because Trump is so many times worse that literally anything Biden does pales by comparison.

Your savior is not president Better luck in 2024
 
well if you are going to lie, you might as well tell a whopper.

Not a lie. Do you know what a lie is? Hint: its not an opinion you don't agree with. A lie is to bear false witness or have a reckless disregard for the truth. Surely understand that from law school. I am one person on this board that can back up just about anything I post, so, thanks for asking.

There have been two studies already have assigned a death count to his inaction / inept response to the pandemic. There will be more.

U.S. Could Have Saved 36,000 Lives If Social Distancing Started 1 Week Earlier: Study : Coronavirus Live Updates : NPR (actual study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.15.20103655v1.full.pdf)
One Decision on Social Distancing Could Have Prevented 90% of US Coronavirus Deaths

You can disagree with their conclusions, but they will keep coming and the numbers will get bigger. It is conventional wisdom among experts throughout the world that Trump handled this poorly. What other explanation do you have for the US to have the most cases, most deaths and most areas of the country that still showing increases, even though we are "re-opening". Can you come to any other conclusion than mismanagement?

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31140-5/fulltext
Influential Medical Journal Castigates Trump, Says 'Public Health Should Not Be Guided By Partisan Politics'
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/28/trump-coronavirus-politics-us-health-disaster
https://www.businessinsider.com/cor...mp-abysmal-grades-on-pandemic-response-2020-3
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...e-house-bungled-coronavirus-response-n1158746
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/cu...they-say-led-to-bungled-response-to-outbreak/

The idea of needless deaths from a poor response to a pandemic is a reasonable conclusion. So, feel free to argue over how many, but its pretty difficult to argue that Trump's actions delivered the minimal number of deaths possible.

Having a ledger of deaths and economic wreckage in an election year is not something that is going to win you re-election. Combine that with a guy that is not very liked... and, we should start of thread on how Trump is going to be as a former President.
 
Not sure I would hire Joe Biden to do anything. I can't think of any defining strengths or accomplishments. Can you?

Yes. He help rid the country of Trump in 2020, thus saving America. He will likely win the Nobel Prize for that feat alone.
 
Not a lie. Do you know what a lie is? Hint: its not an opinion you don't agree with. A lie is to bear false witness or have a reckless disregard for the truth. Surely understand that from law school. I am one person on this board that can back up just about anything I post, so, thanks for asking.

There have been two studies already have assigned a death count to his inaction / inept response to the pandemic. There will be more.

U.S. Could Have Saved 36,000 Lives If Social Distancing Started 1 Week Earlier: Study : Coronavirus Live Updates : NPR (actual study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.15.20103655v1.full.pdf)
One Decision on Social Distancing Could Have Prevented 90% of US Coronavirus Deaths

You can disagree with their conclusions, but they will keep coming and the numbers will get bigger. It is conventional wisdom among experts throughout the world that Trump handled this poorly. What other explanation do you have for the US to have the most cases, most deaths and most areas of the country that still showing increases, even though we are "re-opening". Can you come to any other conclusion than mismanagement?

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31140-5/fulltext
Influential Medical Journal Castigates Trump, Says 'Public Health Should Not Be Guided By Partisan Politics'
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/28/trump-coronavirus-politics-us-health-disaster
https://www.businessinsider.com/cor...mp-abysmal-grades-on-pandemic-response-2020-3
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...e-house-bungled-coronavirus-response-n1158746
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/cu...they-say-led-to-bungled-response-to-outbreak/

The idea of needless deaths from a poor response to a pandemic is a reasonable conclusion. So, feel free to argue over how many, but its pretty difficult to argue that Trump's actions delivered the minimal number of deaths possible.

Having a ledger of deaths and economic wreckage in an election year is not something that is going to win you re-election. Combine that with a guy that is not very liked... and, we should start of thread on how Trump is going to be as a former President.

you are lying. The virus and or underlying medical complications killed those people. Not Trump. And people such as you are gleeful that there are economic problems that you can try to pin on Trump.
 
Yes. He help rid the country of Trump in 2020, thus saving America.
Right... nothing jumps out from the first 78 years, but you have your fingers crossed for the future. :lol:
 
Yes. He help rid the country of Trump in 2020, thus saving America. He will likely win the Nobel Prize for that feat alone.

Did you know that TDS is running rampant among progressives?
 
Did you know that TDS is running rampant among progressives?

They still cannot handle the fact that the MSM told them that their Goddess Mother was going to win. Having that ripped away from them accentuated their feelings of despair
 
so you are calling people such as me-garbage and you wonder why you all lost? Liberals constantly pretend they are more enlightened and intelligent than those of us who don't feel a need for a nanny state government to take care of us. I understand why you make such claims-for lefties to justify running the lives of others, they have to pretend they know what is better for those "others" than the others themselves. But its all BS. Competent independent and self sufficient people don't need public sector parents. We want to be left alone. Now most of the lefties will pretend they are elite and they want to be deciding what others do: however, the fact is, most of those who want big government are afraid of failing and they want someone or something to insulate them from the cost of their own bad decisions.

You complain about me calling Trump supporters garbage, then proceed to attack "lefties" with talking points. Seems to me you're no better than what you claim I am.
 
you are lying. The virus and or underlying medical complications killed those people. Not Trump. And people such as you are gleeful that there are economic problems that you can try to pin on Trump.

The buck stops at the president. Or so Trump said when Obama was in office...;)
 
He didn't know which KC the chiefs play out of. Honestly no one else who's not a chief's fan probably did either BFD.

I took a knee for the NFL long ago.

Ah yes, the "he meant this, not what he actually said" standard defense Trump supporters always have for dear leader. He never means what he says, it's always something nobody understands but his brilliant supporters.
 
so you are calling people such as me-garbage and you wonder why you all lost? Liberals constantly pretend they are more enlightened and intelligent than those of us who don't feel a need for a nanny state government to take care of us. I understand why you make such claims-for lefties to justify running the lives of others, they have to pretend they know what is better for those "others" than the others themselves. But its all BS. Competent independent and self sufficient people don't need public sector parents. We want to be left alone. Now most of the lefties will pretend they are elite and they want to be deciding what others do: however, the fact is, most of those who want big government are afraid of failing and they want someone or something to insulate them from the cost of their own bad decisions.

Also, you talk about liberals being elitist? Dude, you're the one arguing that someone's "education" proves intelligence. Plenty of college educated people who are dumb as a box of rocks. Your constant obsession with IQ when it comes to Democratic politicians speaks volumes to who the real "elitist" really is.
 
They still cannot handle the fact that the MSM told them that their Goddess Mother was going to win. Having that ripped away from them accentuated their feelings of despair

This is the truth. It really started with Obama and Comey being morose that the likes of Trump could beat Hillary, the one who was to carry on the Obama legacy of division, progressivism, low growth and malaise typical of the Carter years. Comey
's wife and daughters were crying and bigly upset. They campaigned for Hillary....carried around signs and stuff. Comey guaranteed the she would win.

Then, the impossible happened and the TDS started. Obama ordered everyone to his office. "Get Trump" was the order. I"I don't care what it takes. Use Flynn and Carter Page to do it." He dismissed all but Comey to hatch the plot in secret.

We all know the rest. Those with TDS dismiss this as a conspiracy theory but we all know it isn't.
 
Also, you talk about liberals being elitist? Dude, you're the one arguing that someone's "education" proves intelligence. Plenty of college educated people who are dumb as a box of rocks. Your constant obsession with IQ when it comes to Democratic politicians speaks volumes to who the real "elitist" really is.

nice evasion-you called those who voted for Trump as "garbage"
 
nice evasion-you called those who voted for Trump as "garbage"

You insult liberals all the time dude. you guys literally elected a president who trolls liberals all the time, just cause. And you buy into bogus conspiracy theories (see the post you liked above) because it makes you feel better about how bad Trump is, and how broken your ideology is.
 
Back
Top Bottom