• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?[W:245]

Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

"... the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated — including some associated with the Trump Campaign — deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts."

Mueller Investigation Report: Read NPR's Analysis And Annotated Highlights : NPR

So members of the Trump campaign and Russians were in constant contact with each other and meet almost two dozen times and they destroyed information that could shed light on those contacts and meetings.

Care to speculate on why they would contact one another and meet and then destroy or hide information that could shed light on those contacts and meeting?

Thank you for publicly surrendering.....anytime a mindless demorat starts posting "Russia" "Putin" it the equivalent
of running up the white flag. Yep, it is those Racist Russians again!

Everyone I Don't Like Is A Russian Asset: A Child's Guide to Political Discourse

When the Durham report comes out, put those blinders on again. You will need them to remain willfully ignorant.
 
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

Abso****inglutely he did. You don't need to commit 20+ instances of Obstruction of Justice if you're innocent.

The Mueller scam was about trying to get Trump on obstruction charges.

They tried desperately... for years... but failed.

Now we see the depths of the Obama, the Deep State and their criminal behavior.

Their scam is unraveling, and the criminals were Obama and his thugs at the DoJ, FBI and CIA.

Russiagate... a massive hoax...and Obama at the center of it.

Threads like this are wonderful... as they expose the brain-****ed-to-a-goo Left.
 
Last edited:
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

I guess those who despise Trump will always portray him in the worst possible light having learned that from the entertainers on TV who laughingly call themselves reporters. To suggest it is logical that Russian could actually somehow find 30,000 destroyed emails that out FBI couldn't borders on insanity, quite frankly. It s TDS to the tenth degree.



Yet the Russians did try to hack the server and could have found other than whatever emails as that would not be necessary to find something they could misrepresent by bot to the public. That's what you don't understand. You portray a logic that if the Russians don't find the 30,000 emails that aren't there, they will ignore whatever else they find. You portray a logic that if invited to look into what's not there, the Russians won't look. The fact is, the Russians were invited to look.
 
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

Yet the Russians did try to hack the server and could have found other than whatever emails as that would not be necessary to find something they could misrepresent by bot to the public. That's what you don't understand. You portray a logic that if the Russians don't find the 30,000 emails that aren't there, they will ignore whatever else they find. You portray a logic that if invited to look into what's not there, the Russians won't look. The fact is, the Russians were invited to look.
May I see the evidence that you alone possess that proves the Russians hacked the DNC. Crowd strike testified that they had no such evidence. But you obviously have some other details to share with us? Thank in advance.
 
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

I can only go off what Comey, Brennan, Rice, etc say.

They all testified under oath that there was no evidence Trump or anyone in his campaign colluded with Russia.
 
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

They had CNN, MSNBS, ABC, PBS, the NY Times, WaPo and many others saying daily that Trump colluded. Not a one has apologized for their indoctrination tactics.

Don't hold your breath 'cause it'll never happen.

I'm not all the concerned about any sort of apology from them, but I would expect that it would cause them self reflection and self awareness as to the bitter division in the electorate that this action of theirs, continued on for months and months, even after it was already suspected as being 100% factually false, to change their behavior. Sad to say that it has not, and the lamestream DNC Pravda 'news' media (political propaganda) continues on exactly the same course as before, as they continue to piss away whatever little credibility they have left.
 
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

I can only go off what Comey, Brennan, Rice, etc say.

They all testified under oath that there was no evidence Trump or anyone in his campaign colluded with Russia.

True, the did, in closed door congressional hearings, while at the same time they continued to spew Trump / Russia nonsense to the public ever chance they could get on the TV.

Some would applaud this as moral and just. Other would call it lying your ass off with intent and purpose.
 
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

May I see the evidence that you alone possess that proves the Russians hacked the DNC. Crowd strike testified that they had no such evidence. But you obviously have some other details to share with us? Thank in advance.



You’re being disingenuous and have no credibility. You simply do not give honest, forthright debate. You go in circles to avoid the fact that you can’t refute anything I’ve said and keep spitting on the sidewalk and dare me to step over it.

I already gave you all the pertinent evidence in post #224.

You’re a waste of time. See you on another thread.
 
Re: Who Still Believes Trump Colluded With Russia to Win in 2016?

You’re being disingenuous and have no credibility. You simply do not give honest, forthright debate. You go in circles to avoid the fact that you can’t refute anything I’ve said and keep spitting on the sidewalk and dare me to step over it.

I already gave you all the pertinent evidence in post #224.

You’re a waste of time. See you on another thread.
LMAO. You are beaten yet again because when pressed for facts, you come up empty. Opinions are a dime a dozen.
 
Back
Top Bottom