• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:184]How do you like this “new normal”?

How do you like this “new normal”?

  • Total voters
    69
it's just me said:
Yes, and I have every right to tell you to get lost. Do you have a problem with that?
Click to expand...

I don't have any problem with it because i know how rude, disrespectful and insignificant you are. You're a small minded person.
 
I have been working from home since March 9. I generally have left home about 1 a week. 3 times to the bank and a few times to drive thru's. The last time I went to the bank during bank hours and it felt strange. People standing outside of the bank waiting to go in. They had a security guard controlling who was going to the ATM, and had to ask me to maintain distance. It feels strange and awkward. I consider my self antisocial in general and this is beyond what even I would like
 
HumblePi said:
I don't have any problem with it because i know how rude, disrespectful and insignificant you are. You're a small minded person.
Click to expand...

I was thinking the same thing about you.
 
X Factor said:
I support your right to rant. Too bad you don’t support others rights to protest or worship in church or work.
Click to expand...

Others may allow you to dishonestly shove words in their mouth; I won't.

I said nothing at all about peaceful protests or worship in church; my entire focus was on those refusing to wear masks in public because "muh freedom." If you don't want to respond to what I've, you know, actually said, then I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't respond at all.
 
Last edited:
it's just me said:
I was thinking the same thing about you.
Click to expand...

Snappy comeback, you think that up all by yourself or did you have someone help you?

Trollers.gif
 
X Factor said:
From face covering requirements to being told, under penalty of law, whether you’re allowed to work or who you’re allowed to be with and where and when. Personally, I ****ing hate it (yeah, that’ll be a poll choice) and I’m not even one who’s suffering financially. I am in no danger of losing my job or not being able to support myself. Sometimes I think I should be more content to live as our ”leaders” tell us and just enjoy not having to go in to work every day, but then some new requirement or restriction gets announced, complete with strong encouragement to report non compliance, and I resent the hell out of it all over again.

Ok, so this is as much a rant as it is a poll but I am legit curious what the general feeling is.

poll incoming
Click to expand...

Not being allowed to work or keep your business open is terrible. Ruining lives over the Covid virus.
 
HumblePi said:
I don't know who said that, but doctors and scientists knew virtually nothing about Covid-19 up to two months ago.
Click to expand...

First of all, Coronavirus has been around since the 60s. Second, there is a large range of opinions from different scientists and medical experts and those opinions are evolving daily. There is no unified opinion.

It was the so called Chinese scientist who said it couldn't be transmitted human to human. This is why I find the morons who always say "i am going to do what the scientist tell me to do" are people who lack the intelligence to think for their selves. Let me give you a little insight. Scientist have people who control their budgets. Scientists will always find what those pulling the purse strings tell them to find.
 
We didn't need to lock down the whole economy. And we should have focused resources on nursing homes and people with compromised health.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Not being allowed to work or keep your business open is terrible. Ruining lives over the Covid virus.
Click to expand...

Dying of CV19 is worse.

Life totally "ruined".




This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Click to expand...
 
it's just me said:
Now that's the best example of projection I have ever seen.

Anecdotal considerations? Are you telling me that you know more about what's going on with my system than I do? I hate to tell you this, but in science you need data to analyze and you have none, at least not where I am concerned. No, it is you who are making assumptions and coming up with the wrong answer.
Click to expand...

The way you describe your system is full of flaws. The one I keep pointing out is the lack of testing. Perhaps if you feel your system works, you can describe it better?
 
Lursa said:
Dying of CV19 is worse.

Life totally "ruined".
Click to expand...

What’s seriously impacting a far greater number of people? The virus or the restrictions?
 
Waddy said:
We didn't need to lock down the whole economy. And we should have focused resources on nursing homes and people with compromised health.
Click to expand...

If there was no lockdown, the death toll would be much higher.
 
X Factor said:
What’s seriously impacting a far greater number of people? The virus or the restrictions?
Click to expand...

Is it impact that matters? Or dying? That is the question each person has to ask themselves. The virus is killing, the restrictions are not.


And it's the perfect question that comes to mind when I think of the pro-life position too.

I keep reading things that show a deep hypocrisy there that I'm hoping to explore...here, in the Abortion sub-forum, wherever, whenever.



This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Click to expand...
 
X Factor said:
Yes, I agree with that. Your health and safety has to lie primarily with you. When the government gets in the business of deciding what’s best for us, there isn’t anything they cannot do and justify for the same reasons they’re giving us now. How much safer would we be if cars were banned? I’d bet the risks of dying in a car crash are much greater that contracting this virus then actually dying from it. Hopefully there exists, in your mind, where you would draw the line and not support behavioral control even if it does save lives.
Click to expand...

You never did respond to this:

X Factor said:
It’s not hyperbole. It’s the government actually flat out telling us who we can be with and who we can’t, whether we can gather in a church parking lot or not, whether we can come together in protest or not. How does the constitution not even come up in your mind?
Click to expand...

If this virus had been as deadly as it is communicable, say 30% death rate...do you think the govt would have been justified in doing all that you just mentioned?​


post 206 for reference


This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Lursa said:
Is it impact that matters? Or dying? That is the question each person has to ask themselves. The virus is killing, the restrictions are not.


And it's the perfect question that comes to mind when I think of the pro-life position too.

I keep reading things that show a deep hypocrisy there that I'm hoping to explore...here, in the Abortion sub-forum, wherever, whenever.
Click to expand...

Except that the restrictions are killing. Suicides are up. People will die because they are not getting physicals and other so called not essential medical treatments. Old people isolated from their families in care facilities are being highly stressed. Domestic abuse is way up. Divorce rates are going up. Families are being destroyed. There are plenty of casualties.

The ignorant want to believe it is lock down or die. They refuse to recognize that precautions can be taken. It is all political and you trying to throw abortion into the mix proves it. You are right on one thing the hypocrisy is deep.
 
BahamaBob said:
Except that the restrictions are killing. Suicides are up. People will die because they are not getting physicals and other so called not essential medical treatments. Old people isolated from their families in care facilities are being highly stressed. Domestic abuse is way up. Divorce rates are going up. Families are being destroyed. There are plenty of casualties.

The ignorant want to believe it is lock down or die. They refuse to recognize that precautions can be taken. It is all political and you trying to throw abortion into the mix proves it. You are right on one thing the hypocrisy is deep.
Click to expand...

Suicides? Exccept for the medical staff that have been suiciding...which IMO is the virus killing them in a different way, that's rough but....suicide is a choice.

And Drs offices are already opening up, they are phase 1 here. As for other people, one reason for social distancing was to reserve medical resources so that ALL could be treated if they needed hospitalization. Not just CV patients.

Those are very indirect and if we have social ills, we should resolve them, not use their exacerbation in a crisis as an excuse for something else.




This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Click to expand...
 
Lursa said:
Suicides? Exccept for the medical staff that have been suiciding...which IMO is the virus killing them in a different way, that's rough but....suicide is a choice.

And Drs offices are already opening up, they are phase 1 here. As for other people, one reason for social distancing was to reserve medical resources so that ALL could be treated if they needed hospitalization. Not just CV patients.

Those are very indirect and if we have social ills, we should resolve them, not use their exacerbation in a crisis as an excuse for something else.
Click to expand...


Gee even you understand we need to open back up. Save your spew on social ills. Social ills ease when stress is removed. That will happen when people can get back to their routines.

Suicide is a choice, a bad choice. However, trying to pretend that the lock down is not a major cause for people making those choices is below you.
 
BahamaBob said:
Gee even you understand we need to open back up. Save your spew on social ills. Social ills ease when stress is removed. That will happen when people can get back to their routines.

Suicide is a choice, a bad choice. However, trying to pretend that the lock down is not a major cause for people making those choices is below you.
Click to expand...

Catching the virus, dying from the virus, are not choices.

You still havent demonstrated any justification for choosing $$ over lives. OTOH, you may not need to justify it, it may be your prioritization. It's a free country, you can think that of course.



This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Click to expand...
 
Lursa said:
Catching the virus, dying from the virus, are not choices.

You still havent demonstrated any justification for choosing $$ over lives. OTOH, you may not need to justify it, it may be your prioritization. It's a free country, you can think that of course.
Click to expand...

Show me how shutting down the country is saving lives. Sweden did not shut down their country and the results are the same. But I do wonder how someone who has no problem with millions of babies being murdered is so worried about a few people dying from the virus.

The solution is simple. If you are afraid, self isolate. The facts show that all but the unhealthy and elderly have little to fear from this virus. Destroying the economy by isolating people who are not in danger is a stupid policy.
 
BahamaBob said:
Show me how shutting down the country is saving lives. Sweden did not shut down their country and the results are the same. But I do wonder how someone who has no problem with millions of babies being murdered is so worried about a few people dying from the virus.

The solution is simple. If you are afraid, self isolate. The facts show that all but the unhealthy and elderly have little to fear from this virus. Destroying the economy by isolating people who are not in danger is a stupid policy.
Click to expand...

Do you believe that we have significantly fewer deaths because we did social distancing and shelter in place? It really doesnt matter if you do or not, it's a fact that we do. Sweden is a failure, with a death rate similar to ours AND a much different social structure and density.

And it's not hard...those that die of CV are still contributing to society, have loved ones, are aware and suffer, have a right to life and their lives dont endanger anyone else's. None of those things applies to the unborn.



This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Click to expand...
 
X Factor said:
That’s funny, when it was protests in the NFL, that was the most and best American thing ever. When it’s people protesting against huge government control, it’s so wrong and “ridiculous”. What other restrictions would you support to “minimize deaths”? I mean, there are a ton of other things that kill us that the government could take action on. When is it too much control even for you?
Click to expand...

Here in Ma....
golf courses open, liquor stores open.
campsites closed, boat ramps closed. Cruisers parked there to ensure you don't to go into the ocean where all the crowds are.
This is the most absurd govt draconian control I have seen in my lifetime and needs to stop!
 
tacomancer said:
The way you describe your system is full of flaws. The one I keep pointing out is the lack of testing. Perhaps if you feel your system works, you can describe it better?
Click to expand...

"My system"" is my biology, which you know nothing about, and you have no testing to prove your claims. This is not hard.
 
Next door to Sweden, Denmark which is not open has fewer deaths because of social distancing. Similar economy, similar life styles, different results. How did Sweden ever become the poster child the memes claim it is?

Clearly there needs to be some middle ground between "my rights, open everything now" and common sense about isolating the disease vectors as much as possible for the good of others.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom