- Joined
- Dec 12, 2019
- Messages
- 30,488
- Reaction score
- 8,841
- Location
- Flaw-i-duh
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
You have Trump confused with Clinton.
No I don't. If you are educated about Trump, you know what I am talking about.
You have Trump confused with Clinton.
So that's the new criticism? Never mind the indiscretions of past presidents while in office, Trump is to be condemned as though he would have done the same thing if he was not so old by the time he was elected to office?
Unlike some past Democrat presidents at least Trump has kept his lust in his pants while in the WH.
So what? Do you deny the reports about Trump sexually assaulting women by grabbing their private parts and bragging he can do that? Yes or no.
Yes, I tend to believe reports about unsaved men committing sexual crimes, especially in their youth. Maybe the reason Trump has not committed sexual crimes while in office like so many past presidents have done is that he was older when elected.
Donald Trump was already an old man. So was Bill Clinton. Age is irrelevant because fertility does not expire in males.
So, knowing Trump sexually assaulted at least 20 women, paid them to not tell police, and bragged about it, why do you think he is a better man than Clinton, whose crime was adultery with one woman?
If you do what? Try to bully Trump? Throw mud for no good reason? That's just Wednesday, and Thursday, and Monday, and no rest on the weekend... So, all the time.
Did you like Trump when he ran for the Republican nomination?
That and destroying the administrative state.
Vietnam seems to be doing pretty well also the kurds that twump abandoned were not ISIS fighters. They were fighting ISIS.
"Keeping most of his promises" - uh, what promises did he keep that benefit all Americans? Did he just do it, or do it in a way that is detrimental to society? Were those promises made for completely selfless reasons and in compassionate ways that unite the nation? People who are educated about Trump know better than to make such assumptions. They know how he kept his promises and that some of those promises had sinister intents.
The fact is I didn't like or dislike Trump because until he got the nomination (shock) he was kind of irrelevant and in the shadows.
Actually I wanted a president who would shake up the establishment on the belt way and Trump wanted that also...I voted Trump hands down and I will vote for him again because he did something no other presidential candidate would do...keep his promises.
Donald Trump was never charged of rape because he paid women to remain silent.
Name the promises that has sinister intent?
You are the one posting baloney. Everyone who is educated about Trump knows exactly why the Democrats impeached him.
Donald Trump was already an old man. So was Bill Clinton. Age is irrelevant because fertility does not expire in males.
So, knowing Trump sexually assaulted at least 20 women, paid them to not tell police, and bragged about it, why do you think he is a better man than Clinton, whose crime was adultery with one woman?
Trump is a bully. If you know anything about him, you know that perfectly well. So I am against the bully.
Who has promised to cover our legal fees if we do?
So did Bill Clinton and Democrats still voted for him. What is your double standard point?
Are you serious?If you are educated about Donald Trump, you know why it was an extremely intelligent decision to impeach him.
Trump committed no crimes nor impeachable offenses. Where were you earlier this year when this was proven in the Senate trial?So tell me why you think - based only on unbiased, proven, objective facts - the Democrats were stupid to charge Trump of crimes he obviously committed, knowing exactly what he did that was criminal.
rSo what? Do you deny the reports about Trump sexually assaulting women by grabbing their private parts and bragging he can do that? Yes or no.
Even some democrats in the house disagreed with the impeachment process..And the world knows he wasn't convicted and he is obviously still your worst nightmare and monster in the closet.
r
Reports by whom...your favorite talking head on CNN? How about Chris Matthews...wait a minute, forget him... he got fired, for you got it, sexual assault and a Nazi comment about Sanders.
Yes, I would have still voted for Trump.If you had to choose between Donald Trump and another Republican with the exact same tax policies, would you have voted for Trump anyway?
Are you serious?
There was no intelligence involved in Trump's impeachment by the House. The fact that no GOP House member voted for it tells us that.
I am educated about Donald Trump as I live ~50 miles south of Manhattan in New Jersey, so "Trump News" has always been local news to us over the past few decades.
Trump committed no crimes nor impeachable offenses. Where were you earlier this year when this was proven in the Senate trial?
Like normal criminal indictments in which you "can indict a ham sandwich", the House can impeach the President on just about anything they want to. All it takes is a simple majority vote.
I don't know what the hell Adam Schiff was doing, nor that nasty little man Jerry Nadler. Both should be recalled by voters. I do hope that both are voted out in November. That is the least that they deserve for diverting the USA's attention away from the opening days of KOVID-19 with their asinine impeachment trial, which they knew that they would lose before it even started.
Their ~23 hour opening statement in the impeachment trial was boring, irrelevant and down right stupid. I'm sure that the GOP Senators wished they had a FF button.