• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

of the top 3 who won New Hampshire, who would you choose?

of the top 3 who won New Hampshire, who would you choose?

  • sanders

    Votes: 5 17.9%

  • buttigieg

    Votes: 6 21.4%

  • klobuchar

    Votes: 11 39.3%

  • I'm voting for Trump but if one of those just has to win it would be..

    Votes: 6 21.4%
  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .
TurtleDude said:
smart people realize that was done without coercion, without threats of government etc.
Click to expand...

Doesn't change the FACT you were a parasite using 'someone else's wealth' for YOUR personal gain. Something you clearly would deprive other's benefiting from, per your post above. Hypocrisy on display, no doubt.
 
TurtleDude said:
That is just but one of the reasons. I tire of the parasite mentality and the attitude that your existence is a just claim on someone else's wealth.
Click to expand...

My attitude is rich people have no reason to complain about paying higher taxes to help poor people because they can afford to pay them. Jesus said, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven." He was speaking out against what people do to make themselves rich: keep all their money and give nothing to the poor. So when I talk about rich people being greedy and uncaring, I am sending the same message Jesus did in my own words.
 
narrowroad said:
on what?

he is for late term abortion. Are u?

of course probably all of them are.. which is why I would NEVER vote for a D much less a socialist much less a commie like Bernie
Click to expand...

There is a big difference between being a democratic socialist and a communist. Norway, perhaps the world's most successful society, is a democratic socialist country. Cuba is a communist country.
 
Logician Man said:
Doesn't change the FACT you were a parasite using 'someone else's wealth' for YOUR personal gain. Something you clearly would deprive other's benefiting from, per your post above. Hypocrisy on display, no doubt.
Click to expand...

This is another example of you jumping on a thread-to take issue at my post with inane idiotic moronic contrarian BS. You are unable to remotely understand the difference of families supporting their members with government coercion. In reality, I doubt you even believe the nonsense you are posting-you have a track record of taking issue of whatever I post=even when you constantly contradict your posts in other threads.
 
Blue Donkey said:
My attitude is rich people have no reason to complain about paying higher taxes to help poor people because they can afford to pay them. Jesus said, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven." He was speaking out against what people do to make themselves rich: keep all their money and give nothing to the poor. So when I talk about rich people being greedy and uncaring, I am sending the same message Jesus did in my own words.
Click to expand...

Well I am agnostic so I don't buy your appeal to authority. I also think you haven't a clue how the rich operate in terms of what they do for the poor and charity. You just seem to wallow in envy of those who are better off than you but then again, modern american leftwing thought is a continual quest to conceal envy of the wealth of others with facades of "social justice" or "equality"
 
TurtleDude said:
This is another example of you jumping on a thread-to take issue at my post with inane idiotic moronic contrarian BS. You are unable to remotely understand the difference of families supporting their members with government coercion. In reality, I doubt you even believe the nonsense you are posting-you have a track record of taking issue of whatever I post=even when you constantly contradict your posts in other threads.
Click to expand...

Diversion attempt duly noted. That aside, by your own admission, the very thing you profess to despise, you engaged in your self. That being you willfully chose to be a parasite, and use 'other's personal wealth' for YOUR personal gain. The apex of hypocrisy.
 
Logician Man said:
Diversion attempt duly noted. That aside, by your own admission, the very thing you profess to despise, you engaged in your self. That being you willfully chose yo be a parasite, and use 'other's personal wealth' for YOUR personal gain. The apex of hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

It is moronic to claim a gift is the same as money coerced from individuals by the government. And your stupid stalking of my posts is getting tiresome. You have no interest in legitimate debate since your only appearance on this thread-as is the case in many others-is to bother me
 
:lamo:2rofll:
 
TurtleDude said:
It is moronic to claim a gift is the same as money coerced from individuals by the government. And your stupid stalking of my posts is getting tiresome. You have no interest in legitimate debate since your only appearance on this thread-as is the case in many others-is to bother me
Click to expand...

Always with the childish whining. Grow up! You stated up thread 'you tire of people who use other's wealth for personal gain. (paraphrasing ) FACT is, you've done the very same thing by your own words. The apex of hypocrisy.
 
Logician Man said:
Always with the childish whining. Grow up! You stated up thread 'you tire of people who use other's wealth for personal gain. (paraphrasing ) FACT is, you've done the very same thing by your own words. The apex of hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

you are lying and you clearly are unable to understand the concept of government coercion. You aren't engaged in anything approaching honest debate, you are merely trying to bait me
 
TurtleDude said:
you are lying and you clearly are unable to understand the concept of government coercion. You aren't engaged in anything approaching honest debate, you are merely trying to bait me
Click to expand...

No. I'm calling you out for your hypocrisy. If you don't like your own truth being addressed, you best not put your truth forth in a debate forum where your hypocritical truth is open to being exposed and addressed. In debating terms, some call that being one's own worst enemy.
 
Going for Buttigieg at present. Like everything about him except his lack of experience. but Amy has a chance to change my mind. I honestly have not give her a fair hearing because I liked Warren's views more and she was so specific in her progressive stances,and she was higher in the polls all along. Klobuchar never caught my attention.
 
Last edited:
Logician Man said:
No. I'm calling you out for your hypocrisy. If you don't like your own truth being addressed, you best not put your truth forth in a debate forum where your hypocritical truth is open to being exposed and addressed. In debating terms, some call that being one's own worst enemy.
Click to expand...

you haven't a clue what you are talking about. You seem unable to even comprehend the difference between familial support (next you will claim that a new born baby is a parasite upon its parents if you think that will pester me) and government coercion. You seem befuddled with the concept that intelligent people believe that part of having children is providing for their education, and as my parents provided for me, I provide for my son. That doesn't impose any costs on others nor requires government coercion. Your posting-other than demonstrating your desire to bait me-suggests that you are envious of those whose family helped them achieve an education.
 
TurtleDude said:
you haven't a clue what you are talking about. You seem unable to even comprehend the difference between familial support (next you will claim that a new born baby is a parasite upon its parents if you think that will pester me) and government coercion. You seem befuddled with the concept that intelligent people believe that part of having children is providing for their education, and as my parents provided for me, I provide for my son. That doesn't impose any costs on others nor requires government coercion. Your posting-other than demonstrating your desire to bait me-suggests that you are envious of those whose family helped them achieve an education.
Click to expand...

You can strawman and toss red herrings until you are blue in the face if you so choose. That doesn't change the FACT you were a 'parasite' using 'someone else's' wealth for YOUR own personal gain. Deal with your own reality which YOU, unsolicited, put forth in this this very thread.
 
Logician Man said:
You can strawman and toss red herrings until you are blue in the face if you so choose. That doesn't change the FACT you were a 'parasite' using 'someone else's' wealth for YOUR own personal gain. Deal with your own reality which YOU, unsolicited, put forth in this this very thread.
Click to expand...

troll someone else, I am not going to engage in this stupidity anymore.
 
Blue Donkey said:
My attitude is rich people have no reason to complain about paying higher taxes to help poor people because they can afford to pay them. Jesus said, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven." He was speaking out against what people do to make themselves rich: keep all their money and give nothing to the poor. So when I talk about rich people being greedy and uncaring, I am sending the same message Jesus did in my own words.
Click to expand...

Let’s keep the separation of Church and State.
 
HumblePi said:
With Amy Klobuchar, I've found that the more I know about her, the more I like her. She has actually accomplished some great things as a Senator.

I'll share a link, it's a government tracking site and this link that shows what bills were passed and whose bills they are attributed to. You'll see Amy Klobuchar a few times and Bernie Sanders no times. It's a quick read

Legislation introduced by the 2020 candidates this year: Health and Criminal Justice
Click to expand...

I like Amy a lot. More so now, than 2 months ago. I told my wife she at least gets a VP spot, or should. Super Tuesday should be a doozie.
 
btthegreat said:
Going for Buttigieg at present. Like everything about him except his lack of experience. but Amy has a chance to change my mind. I honestly have not give her a fair hearing because I liked Warren's views more and she was so specific in her progressive stances,and she was higher in the polls all along. Klobuchar never caught my attention.
Click to expand...


With Amy Klobuchar, I've found that the more I know about her, the more I like her. She has actually accomplished some great things as a Senator.

I'll share a link, it's a government tracking site and this link that shows what bills were passed and whose bills they are attributed to. You'll see Amy Klobuchar a few times and Bernie Sanders no times. It's a quick read

Legislation introduced by the 2020 candidates this year: Health and Criminal Justice

err...d-d-did I post this twice?

Anyway, I have been an Amy fan for the past two years. I was delighted she decided to run but was disappointed in the sluggishness of her earlier debates. Now she has momentum.
 
Last edited:
HumblePi said:
With Amy Klobuchar, I've found that the more I know about her, the more I like her. She has actually accomplished some great things as a Senator.

I'll share a link, it's a government tracking site and this link that shows what bills were passed and whose bills they are attributed to. You'll see Amy Klobuchar a few times and Bernie Sanders no times. It's a quick read

Legislation introduced by the 2020 candidates this year: Health and Criminal Justice

err...d-d-did I post this twice?

Anyway, I have been an Amy fan for the past two years. I was delighted she decided to run but was disappointed in the sluggishness of her earlier debates. Now she has momentum.
Click to expand...

If Amy Klobuchar is the best that we can do then we are so ****ed.

I mean we are actually, but I really dont need to see any more evidence in that direction currently!
 
Hawkeye10 said:
If Amy Klobuchar is the best that we can do then we are so ****ed.

I mean we are actually, but I really dont need to see any more evidence in that direction currently!
Click to expand...

We can't possibly be any more ****ed than the ****er in the white house ****ing us all.
 
HumblePi said:
We can't possibly be any more ****ed than the ****er in the white house ****ing us all.
Click to expand...

"I'll pick the least worse since I am being given no good options by the FAILED INTELLIGENTSIA" defines my life.

We have to do better!
 
narrowroad said:
on what?

he is for late term abortion. Are u?

of course probably all of them are.. which is why I would NEVER vote for a D much less a socialist much less a commie like Bernie
Click to expand...

have you ever read any of Diana West's books? American Betrayal is an excellent explanation of the Socialist/Communist thread that runs through the power centers of Washington, DC. You'd be surprised who has a Socialist/Communist background, and who still feel that way.
 
Aberration said:
Let’s keep the separation of Church and State.
Click to expand...

Tell that to the ‘oh so faithful’ pr?sident bringing the church into ‘government’ schools; and your Pastor Pence; and to the right-wing engineers in your gop invading everyone’s bedroom;

Tell it to the Bible Belt, Evangelicals, and family values frauds who are the guts of the gop; to the trump/mcconnell Federal Judiciary; to the gop state legislatures merging the state and church;

You sure set yourself up for this one; going for a most shallow cheap **** just to get a like from a guy you follow around liking every one of his posts;
 
HumblePi said:
With Amy Klobuchar, I've found that the more I know about her, the more I like her. She has actually accomplished some great things as a Senator.

I'll share a link, it's a government tracking site and this link that shows what bills were passed and whose bills they are attributed to. You'll see Amy Klobuchar a few times and Bernie Sanders no times. It's a quick read

Legislation introduced by the 2020 candidates this year: Health and Criminal Justice

err...d-d-did I post this twice?

Anyway, I have been an Amy fan for the past two years. I was delighted she decided to run but was disappointed in the sluggishness of her earlier debates. Now she has momentum.
Click to expand...
This is a good start no doubt. Clearly she intends to accomplish things in the Senate. She's also got that experience as a prosecutor. Its a lot to turn away for a South Bend Mayor, but that guy is a very smart, very articulate, very well educated man who is very careful about what he is doing in those interviews and debates. He is definitely going places. What you have done here, is make me do some homework! I thought this vote of mine was a sealed deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom