• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hunter Biden For Bolton?

Hunter Biden For Bolton?

  • Total voters
    32
Jack Fabulous said:
I'm only telling you why it is relevant. The abuse of power charge rests squarely on motive and Hunter's testimony would be front and center to the President's stated motive of rooting out corruption. You or I believing that motive or not is irrelevant.
Click to expand...


You posted that you thought you knew what the line of questioning would be. What do you think HB would be asked and how would it be relevant?
 
Jack Fabulous said:
I'm only telling you why it is relevant. The abuse of power charge rests squarely on motive and Hunter's testimony would be front and center to the President's stated motive of rooting out corruption. You or I believing that motive or not is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

The corruption in question is that of the president. Hunter was not on the call.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
I'm only telling you why it is relevant. The abuse of power charge rests squarely on motive and Hunter's testimony would be front and center to the President's stated motive of rooting out corruption. You or I believing that motive or not is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
But congress believing it or not is very relevant.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Sure it is... which is why calling Hunter Biden is within the scope of relevance.
Click to expand...

Which is why Rudy needs to brought forward also, bring he was trumpd man on the ground, let's hear his story.
 
Casper said:
Which is why Rudy needs to brought forward also, bring he was trumpd man on the ground, let's hear his story.
Click to expand...

Attorney client privilege will put a damper of that.
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Attorney client privilege will put a damper of that.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, I doubt that would apply here, since Rudy was not just consulting a client, he is an active player himself. SCJ Roberts can make a clean decision on that if questioned.
 
MSgt said:
That doesn't answer the question. You merely showed the mechanism in which Trump's defense uses to avoid calling Mulvaney and Pomeo.
Click to expand...

Actually the mechanism has not been called into play since the house neglected to bother challenging.
 
I chose other because it doesn't matter now as this BS partisan witch hunt is pretty much over anyway
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom