- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 36,913
- Reaction score
- 11,283
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
It's cuz of the chinese. :roll:
That's what I thought. :mrgreen:
It's cuz of the chinese. :roll:
I dunno, maybe because you went all jfuh on me and started misrepresenting everything I was saying and then calling me a dumbass and other names. Just a guess though.
That was only my reaction to your hissy fit.
And I didn't misrepresent your words either. Do you not remember me suggesting that you could have worded things better? The way you were wording it, sounded like a scared school girl, who thought every transsexual was mentally ill and ready to pounce.
And no, it was a carefully chosen rhetoric meant to be sobering in response to all the namby pamby "let's just all feel good about a mental defect".
She doesn't show signs of mental defect (beyond pretending that her mutilated genitalia makes her a woman).
What's wrong with feeling good about a mental defect?
That's kinda like saying that Catherine Zeta-Jones (who admittedly underwent rhinoplasty early in her career) shows no signs of mental defect beyond pretending that her mutilated nose makes her attractive.
Like saying that former Playmate of the Year Carmen Electra (whose breast implants were paid for by her then-boyfriend B-Real, of the band Cypress Hill) shows no obvious derangement besides the belief that her mutilated body makes her somehow sexually appealing to men.
:roll:
I think those are pretty accurate comparisons.
So, in other words, it's society that's deranged, not these individuals who undergo surgery?
Do you think most people believe Zeta-Jones to be unattractive, or Electra to be sexually unappealing?
Do you think most people's opinion of these women's appeal is despite their so-called "mutilations", or because of them?
You don't get to rephrase or even demand a rephrasing of my posts. What about that doesn't compute?
And no, it was a carefully chosen rhetoric meant to be sobering in response to all the namby pamby "let's just all feel good about a mental defect".
Okay, fine. Then you're wrong. It isn't "pretend." I've already shown you why it isn't "pretend." You're co-worker isn't pretending.
You're just impossible Jallman. Simply unbelievable.
What if I told you that you're just pretending to like men? You're a man, you should like women. Are you going to let me tell you what you think. Do you have a say in who you are?
A preference or attraction is not the same as looking down at your genitalia and claiming that your are the opposite of what you see.
Because it's a mental defect??
It should be addressed and treated, not indulged and encouraged.
A preference or attraction is not the same as looking down at your genitalia and claiming that your are the opposite of what you see.
No, it isn't preference or attraction. It's identity.
I'm not sure I agree, but I think using your situation "against you" in an effort to make a point on a forum isn't right.
The hostility in this thread is weird to me.
I mean, I feel mildly affronted, on an intellectual level, on behalf of transgendered individuals because of some of the sentiments expressed here, but it's not, like, personal.
Why is this issue personal enough to so many here to induce what appears to be genuine anger? Especially to those who claim never to have even met a transgendered individual?
I'm not sure I agree, but I think using your situation "against you" in an effort to make a point on a forum isn't right.
I think those are pretty accurate comparisons.
Yeah that "WAAAAAAA, jallman's a big ole meanie". Whatever Dezaad...when your or other's opinions of ME become the topic of debate, why don't you send around a memo that I can promptly toss in the circular file.
As far as I know, the topic of debate here is TRANSGENDERED. INSANE OR MISUNDERSTOOD.
Maybe you'd like to stick to that topic? kthanx
Don't worry about jallman. If he can dish it, he can take it.
Reframe your post?! Are you kidding me??
You equated a transsexual to a pathological liar. You did that on your own, buddy. I didn't do any reframing.
Your apparent fear of them is obvious, as it is irrational.
Again, my assertion still stands: You've offered nothing to this topic other than your own personal dogma repeated over and over. Stay on topic, indeed. There is really nothing to discuss with you, except you, because you make it an issue by being YOU! By being the way you are being in this thread. But, you're right, it is off topic. So I am done with you. Carry on with your self.
Then you misunderstand sexuality in general because my identity is far from defined by my sexuality.
And there is nothing pretend about:
Penis looks at itself in the mirror and sees penis and happens to like other penis.
As opposed to:
Penis looks into the mirror and sees vagina...
Doesn't matter what penis's preference is at that point...it's already pretending to be vagina. There's the pathology.
What's wrong with feeling good about a mental defect?